HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Suburbs


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2023, 11:55 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,397
Downtown Stoney Creek doesn't have much parkland. It's nice that this is a bit off the main street, but close enough to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2024, 3:53 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,859
Contentious plan for eight-story condo in Upper Stoney Creek heads straight to appeal tribunal
Builder reneges on vow to seek ‘made-in-Hamilton solution’

https://www.thespec.com/news/content...amilton-region

"A contentious plan for an eight-storey condominium building on a former church lot between Billy Green and St. Paul schools in upper Stoney Creek is being appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal, despite the builder’s promise to not do so.

John Ariens, planning consultant for proponent Mikmada Homes, said his client decided to file the Jan. 2 appeal after it became clear city planners wouldn’t support the 304-unit development, even with changes that tried to address residents’ objections.

City staff had been scheduled to present a report recommending denial of the related rezoning applications at the Jan. 16 planning committee, which was also to include a required public meeting."


"“From the beginning, an eight-storey tower was just something that was inflaming the community; they were so upset,” Clark said, noting more than 4,000 people have signed petitions against the plan, the most he’s ever seen for a development in his ward.

“The residents were not objecting to townhouses or stacked townhouses, they were objecting to the height of the (condo) building; that was their objection and I think it was a reasonable objection.”"

8 storeys is obviously crazy town. Here's yet another example of the city opposing and delaying housing that is desperately needed. Brad Clark isn't a stupid guy obviously but he's only opposing it because he has 4000 nutbar constituents that deserve naming and shaming. The city will get slammed at the OLT and rightly so.

Last edited by drpgq; Jan 30, 2024 at 3:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2024, 10:04 AM
ohhimark ohhimark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 77
Over 4000 people signed the petition.. that seems suspicious. It looks like only a handful of houses even face that property. Curious what, if any, proposals the city hasn't opposed lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2025, 9:30 PM
King&James's Avatar
King&James King&James is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,321
Oh my goodness, outrageous ������
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2025, 9:29 AM
ohhimark ohhimark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 77
The horror!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2025, 5:14 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,397
I'm not sure if the last comments were sarcasm over the local opinions or the render.

I have to wonder how much "local opposition" there was to the power centres that sprung up along Stone Church near the Upper RHVP; many of the same criticisms about traffic and not fitting the existing neighbourhood form could be leveled at the retail plazas. Some of those neighbourhoods have been around a while.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2025, 5:19 PM
Berklon's Avatar
Berklon Berklon is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamingViking View Post
I have to wonder how much "local opposition" there was to the power centres that sprung up along Stone Church near the Upper RHVP; many of the same criticisms about traffic and not fitting the existing neighbourhood form could be leveled at the retail plazas. Some of those neighbourhoods have been around a while.
They see the power centres as something that benefits them. "I can drive a shorter distance to shop! So convenient!". Basically, it's about "me, me, me!" as usual.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2025, 12:25 AM
ohhimark ohhimark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 77
My horror was directed towards the locals opposition. Think of the poor kids that may now find a home! lol. The render does have an Imperial Palace casino vibe to it.

Berklon hit the nail on the head. Surely rows of stores create traffic, with people coming and going all day, vs how busy do apartment/condo parking lots get?

Maybe they should offer incentives for things to not go to the OLT, like if the development ends up approved, they can build 20% larger/taller, tax credit, idk. Some kind of deterrent at least.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2025, 12:42 AM
King&James's Avatar
King&James King&James is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,321
Similar, this type of infill should have been rubber stamped in the same motion that we all signed on not to expand our urban boundaries. In fact it should have been mandatory to increase density everywhere we have main roads and transit corridors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Suburbs
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:59 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.