HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted May 22, 2010, 11:34 AM
Avanine-Commuter Avanine-Commuter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 52
The arguments here are way out of hand. People aren't even talking about the right things anymore. Muppet has the right idea IMO, and everyone else is making petty arguments and dismissing responses as "inaccuracies" and "incredulities" as Muppet pointed out.

Get back on track: NYC is NOT the first multicultural city in the world. FACT. It may have been the first to reach a certain # etc., but multiculturalism has always existed in ancient cities. Get back to the roots of the argument. Multicultural means:"of, relating to, or constituting several cultural or ethnic groups within a society". As long as those ethnic groups have a community that practices their cultural ideas and heritage, it is a cultural phenomenon and it constitutes multiculturalism. The amount of diversity in many of the ancient cities mentioned are astounding, and by claiming the NYC is the first multicultural city is an insult to the history of those ethnic groups.

Now, those arguing otherwise will comeback saying "that's not what I meant!" and bring more BS to the table about irrelevant sh!t.

BTW, eye color is controlled by more than just 1 gene per parent. Estimated to be around 4. I don't know how that complicates the lineage if a dominant dark eye color gene came into the mix, but I'm sure it's NOT the same.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted May 22, 2010, 4:31 PM
Jasonhouse Jasonhouse is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 23,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by fflint View Post
You mean just like how we suddenly stopped talking about New York in 2010, the actual topic of the original post, and started talking about anyplace but New York? Bummer...
This is what I'm wondering... If you people want to talk about other places, then make a thread to discuss those other places, instead of hijacking this one.

I'm almost inclined to delete the last few pages of this thread and start it over. (not going to though)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted May 22, 2010, 9:00 PM
StethJeff's Avatar
StethJeff StethJeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,066
New York is definitely not the "first" or "original" multicultural city. Not by a long shot. However, I will accept the notion that New York was the first city to represent all corners of the globe. Due to technological advances in transportation, New York was the first one that exploited this advantage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted May 23, 2010, 10:08 AM
muppet's Avatar
muppet muppet is offline
if I sang out of tune
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London
Posts: 6,524
^thankyou

Before it gets pointed out I'd add ...in such large numbers (as many other New World cities were also receiving their call for 'new populations' at that time, but were nowhere as large as NYC then, eg Rio, BA, CH, SP, SF)

Last edited by muppet; May 23, 2010 at 12:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted May 23, 2010, 10:59 PM
IIan's Avatar
IIan IIan is offline
Ian
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 169
Not as large and not as diverse, BUT Buenos Aires still has the record of foreign born population... 75% in 1914!!!!



The only lack for BA at those times compared to NY were probably africans...
__________________
Argentina... no se explica ni se entiende, solo se siente
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2010, 3:54 AM
TheCity TheCity is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by StethJeff View Post
New York is definitely not the "first" or "original" multicultural city. Not by a long shot. However, I will accept the notion that New York was the first city to represent all corners of the globe. Due to technological advances in transportation, New York was the first one that exploited this advantage.
America is the most diverse country in the world. This country was built off of immigrants. NY leads the U.S. in diversity. Therefore, this makes NY one of the most diverse cities in the world and has been proven through many studies. Also, Queens County is the most diverse county in the states.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IIan View Post
Not as large and not as diverse, BUT Buenos Aires still has the record of foreign born population... 75% in 1914!!!!



The only lack for BA at those times compared to NY were probably africans...
Cool fact. But this was in 1914, not in present time.

Last edited by TheCity; Jun 3, 2010 at 4:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2010, 4:55 PM
pico44's Avatar
pico44 pico44 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,452
Ahhh, memories. Isn't this is the thread that went to 7 pages because of a single inflammatory comment made by yours truly. Good times.

Anyhow, I think I realized very quickly after I made the comment that it was inaccurate unless I qualified it, which was an uphill struggle. Or should I say an upmountain struggle.

Final point is this. The immigrant story in New York is a unique one. Not just in size and scope, but in the very principles behind it. An open call to the entire world to not only improve their situation, but to be a part of something truly great. A 20th century incubator where we proved that a 21st century global society might actually work.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:46 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.