Quote:
BTW, I almost never side with the too tall/too modern/doesn't address the surrounding area arguments, but the Tupelo just seems like such a clear example of why these things are important.
|
I'm with you. That building, due to its scale, is of central importance to the street and at this point it looks like it is going to be an art-less and very bulky failure. It looks extremely cheap and generic. Compare it to the LEED-Platinum Shaver Green affordable apartments going up on MLK -- well, there is no comparison, actually. Of course, I don't know the fine points of the financial realities and choices faced by each developer (Shaver Green is state subsidized to a significant extent). But the firm that designed Shaver Green obviously did a bang-up job designing a quality building within whatever constraints were handed to them. Sera did not, though who knows what Trammell-Crow demanded of them.
I'll take some pics this weekend. One thing I noticed riding by earlier today was that the backside of the development looks much better -- more townhouse-style, with bioswales, alternating colors, and pitched roofs.