HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #13921  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 7:41 PM
ChelseaFC's Avatar
ChelseaFC ChelseaFC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 990
26-story Alexan tower adjacent to Eastern Columbia Building under review with LA City Planning

https://therealdeal.com/la/2023/04/2...la-apartments/
__________________
Downtown LA Development MapCentral LA Development MapPasadena Development Map

*Send PM for updates/edits/corrections*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13922  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 7:48 PM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,667
Plans Move Forward To Allow 135K New Housing Units In Downtown LA And Hollywood

David Wagner
LAist
Apr 26, 2023

By some estimates, Los Angeles County has an affordable housing shortage of half a million homes. Part of that shortage has to do with local rules limiting where certain kinds of housing can be built. In parts of L.A., these rules haven’t been updated since the Reagan administration.

Los Angeles city councilmembers just took a major step toward refreshing those rules in two of the city’s vital urban cores, raising hopes and fears about the city’s future development.

The council’s powerful Planning and Land Use Management committee voted Monday to advance long-awaited community plan updates for Downtown L.A. and Hollywood. If approved by the full city council in a final vote expected in coming weeks, these plans would allow for 135,000 units of new housing in those neighborhoods.

Why new community plans are such a big deal

L.A. is suffering from a severe housing crisis, with a third of tenants in the city spending more than half of their income on rent. (The government's affordability standard is no more than 30% of your income.) Under state law, the city is required to plan for 455,000 new housing units by 2029.

“The community plans are one of the most important tools to incentivize and produce new housing,” said Scott Epstein, policy and research director for the housing advocacy organization Abundant Housing L.A.

Community plans outline the land use rules and regulations developers must follow if they want to build new housing in a given area, Epstein said.

“That's everything from how tall buildings can be. What uses are permitted in certain areas — commercial, residential, light industrial. What kind of affordability requirements should be included,” he said.

Elected leaders want to channel much of the city’s new housing development into established urban cores such as Downtown L.A. and Hollywood. They see those neighborhoods as the most viable — most of L.A.’s residential land is zoned for single family homes and elected officials are focused on siting new apartment buildings in existing commercial corridors.

Doubling down on DTLA’s residential transformation

Downtown L.A. represents just 1% of the city’s land, but, if approved by the full city council, its new community plan would accommodate 20% of the city’s projected housing growth over the next two decades. Rezonings outlined in the plan would double the areas where housing can be built, allowing 100,000 new apartments and condos to be built downtown.

For years, downtown was plagued with vacant storefronts and apartments. But it has since undergone a sweeping residential transformation. This updated plan would encourage more conversion of old or underused commercial properties into apartments and allow new housing in manufacturing zones.

“I think we're looking at another transformation of downtown,” said Nella McOsker, president of the downtown business group Central City Association. “[There’s] really exciting potential for a key section of the city to help alleviate this housing crisis we see across the region.”

Epstein said he thinks that by eliminating parking requirements for new housing in Downtown L.A., the community plan will encourage more residents to go car-free.

“You're going to see parking lots turn into housing,” he said. “I think you're going to see a lot more small businesses. With housing growth, you're going to actually see new schools pop up in some of these neighborhoods.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13923  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2023, 8:52 PM
DJM19 DJM19 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChelseaFC View Post
26-story Alexan tower adjacent to Eastern Columbia Building under review with LA City Planning

https://therealdeal.com/la/2023/04/2...la-apartments/
Can we get work going on 4th and Hill now too? that corner really needs the development that was proposed there. Its in a pretty sorry state otherwise.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13924  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 7:15 PM
citywatch citywatch is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,518
Quote:
HOK Signals its Investment in Downtown Los Angeles with Studio Relocation to the Arts District

In a move that reflects its bold, creative and forward-thinking culture, HOK’s Los Angeles studio has chosen to relocate its award-winning Southern California studio to ROW DTLA in the Arts District. HOK, a global design, architecture, interiors, engineering and planning firm with 1,600 people across a network of 25 offices on three continents, has leased 20,000 SF within the historic and industrial series of buildings at ROW DTLA.

“While we called Culver City home for almost 20 years, we are thrilled to start a new chapter in the Arts District in Downtown Los Angeles. We have closely watched as a wealth of innovative redevelopment projects have sprung up within the Arts District and knew the location would directly align with our creative values and serve as an opportunity for growth,” said Anne Fletcher, managing principal for HOK’s Los Angeles studio.

The relocation to the Arts District signals HOK’s commitment to revitalizing Downtown Los Angeles and also coincides with the studio’s 40th anniversary in Los Angeles.
Every section of the basin, from thousand oaks to the north to Irvine to the south, is competing with one another. Every section of the nation & world too. If dtla could grab a larger share of that...& not lose what it already has...that would be one way of filling up its vacant spaces, & grabbing more tenants & customers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13925  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 8:00 PM
ChelseaFC's Avatar
ChelseaFC ChelseaFC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 990
Samuel Oschin Air and Space Center


https://twitter.com/casciencecenter
__________________
Downtown LA Development MapCentral LA Development MapPasadena Development Map

*Send PM for updates/edits/corrections*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13926  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 8:03 PM
AskMrNoah AskMrNoah is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 11
MVE + Partners 1200 S. Olive Renderings

MVE has released renderings for 1200 S. Olive/222 W 12th.
The site was slated for a 16-story, 356-unit modular high-rise but instead will now be a 398 unit 8-story.


Last edited by AskMrNoah; Apr 27, 2023 at 8:10 PM. Reason: Attached Renderings
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13927  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 10:20 PM
nmkef nmkef is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 106
Looks like a new rendering for 845 S Olive snuck into that post with reduced now below Stillwell Hotel


Compare to old renders:


https://la.urbanize.city/post/releva...ial-tower-dtla
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13928  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 10:23 PM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,876
Disappointed in the height reductions but these are beefy and seem to be good infill.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13929  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 10:47 PM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,667
Quote:
Originally Posted by LosAngelesSportsFan View Post
Disappointed in the height reductions but these are beefy and seem to be good infill.
Absolutely. Lower-rise infill may bum out some of us skyscraper fans, but it's much easier and more affordable to build (and rent/buy). These are the kinds of projects that will grow the population of downtown, and LA in general.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13930  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 2:31 AM
AskMrNoah AskMrNoah is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmkef View Post
Looks like a new rendering for 845 S Olive snuck into that post with reduced now below Stillwell Hotel


Compare to old renders:


https://la.urbanize.city/post/releva...ial-tower-dtla
I was wondering about this building, but I couldn’t put my finger on the location! I’m going to assume that the building will no longer have 329 apartments because of the decrease in height. I was really looking forward to the previous design. With high quality materials both street facing entrances would’ve have been quite nice. Hopefully we will be provided with update info on the changes.

Last edited by AskMrNoah; Apr 28, 2023 at 2:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13931  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 2:34 AM
AskMrNoah AskMrNoah is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigs View Post
Absolutely. Lower-rise infill may bum out some of us skyscraper fans, but it's much easier and more affordable to build (and rent/buy). These are the kinds of projects that will grow the population of downtown, and LA in general.
I agree, also it will fit right into the surroundings since most newer developments surrounding it are 7 stories. I like how the commercial space will activate the corner too. Many restaurants are looking for spaces with outdoor dining potential so this will be a positive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13932  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 3:13 AM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,421
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigs View Post
Absolutely. Lower-rise infill may bum out some of us skyscraper fans, but it's much easier and more affordable to build (and rent/buy). These are the kinds of projects that will grow the population of downtown, and LA in general.
If you are going to have ground up development in the Historic Core, this scale of building should be the benchmark.
__________________
Washed Out
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13933  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 4:26 AM
ocman ocman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Burlingame
Posts: 2,703
Quote:
Originally Posted by LosAngelesSportsFan View Post
Disappointed in the height reductions but these are beefy and seem to be good infill.
I’m assuming they couldn’t get the funding, which begs the question of why investors are always so hesitant of funding tall buildings in LA. Or is it height laws or parking requirements or other LA building rules nonsense that causes developers to chop the size? I’d really like to know.

But they always get downsized. This is maybe a couple stories higher than the usual though.

The project is beautiful by the way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13934  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 5:22 AM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,667
Highrises always cost more to construct than 8-story buildings do, so they are more rare. That also means that the housing costs more for renters/buyers, too. We are lucky to have both kinds of housing developments going up downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13935  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 3:33 PM
headcheckjj's Avatar
headcheckjj headcheckjj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 221
Where are these new renderings from?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13936  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 8:53 PM
nmkef nmkef is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by headcheckjj View Post
Where are these new renderings from?
https://www.instagram.com/p/CrjI3-Ku...d=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13937  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2023, 7:39 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,548
I’m a sucker for masonry buildings, so if that’s the design we’ll get, I’m all for it. Plenty of room for skyscrapers elsewhere, and a mix of mid-rise and skyscraper is my ideal urban environment anyway.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13938  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2023, 7:51 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,548
1200 Olive is basically what I was referring to when I said that LA is better off with “DC-style” development (you also see more of this masonry-style design in Seattle, Portland, and Denver), a comment that drew criticism.

It’s very hard to do infill right these days. In the absence of pre-war fabric for context, you have two options: draw cues from classical architecture (i.e. no bright colors or gimmicks with the fenestration) — either with brick/stone, metal (i.e. Godfrey Hotel Hollywood), fiber cement, or smooth stucco (M1 in Silver Lake) — or go full-on modern like Portland’s Slate.

The Park Santa Monica (500 Broadway) by Koning Eizenberg and generally anything by LoHA is appreciated as well.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13939  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2023, 8:28 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,548
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChelseaFC View Post
26-story Alexan tower adjacent to Eastern Columbia Building under review with LA City Planning

https://therealdeal.com/la/2023/04/2...la-apartments/
The EC is worthy of a much better-looking, taller neighbor. I’d rather this remain a parking lot until then.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13940  
Old Posted May 1, 2023, 12:35 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,026
What a ridiculous article. This person is complaining that housing and mixed-use development is going to replace some of the 260 acres of parking if the gondola connecting Union Station to Dodger Stadium is built.

A $300-million (minimum) gondola to Dodger Stadium? Why is Frank McCourt really pushing this?

Bill Shaikin
LA Times
Apr. 30, 2023

https://www.latimes.com/sports/story...-frank-mccourt
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:23 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.