The Denver-SLC population comparison on the sub as well as past conversations here have made me curious about whether or not SLC's metro population figures will ever be more accurate? When using the
combined statistical area as opposed to metropolitan area SLC the gap between the two regions is much smaller
It seems misleading or at least silly that when you look up salt lake's metro population it only says 1.2 million but when including ogden/provo/park city/logan it's nearly 3 million. I understand Utah is a bit unique when it comes to the amount of cities but I don't see why this discrepancy between CSA and MSA populations has to be so much larger than other nearby cities