HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1321  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2006, 4:08 PM
bluedogok's Avatar
bluedogok bluedogok is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 804
Quote:
Originally Posted by redirector
In my experience, true apartments are much noisier in build quality -- one can hear plumbing pipes, drainage, people walking above you, noise through the adjacent walls. This is much more sound-proofed than an apartment. Rentals typically are carpeted vs wood floors, the appliances are two grades below... 3 fixture bathrooms are normal... heavy acoustic spray ceilings, etc.
I found this to partly true even for some of those built in the early 80's (pre oil/banking/real estate bust). The apartments that I lived in Dallas were originally developed as condos but when the collapse happened they were still under construction (it was even in a book about one pf the S&L's that failed). Someone bought the project and finished them into apartments. It was the best apartment that I lived in. It had the concrete floors, a large patio/storage area and was much quieter than the rest of them that I lived in. The only time that I really had any neighbor noise was when a band downstairs decided to jam and the bass would be noticable. I never had much in the way of noises other than hearing a door next to mine open/close. Plus my electric bill would only be $25 in winter and $50 in summer and I keep my place cold.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAM
We don't have state tax in Texas. We just get gouged on property tax
They all get their money somehow, they all just use different methods.
     
     
  #1322  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2006, 4:14 PM
crewer crewer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Palm Springs, CA
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAM
We don't have state tax in Texas. We just get gouged on property tax:

Typical breakdown:

Austin ISD 1.623%
Travis County 0.4872%
Austin Comm College 0.0900%
City of Austin 0.4430%
Travis Co Hospital Dist 0.0779%

Total 2.7211% of Market value of property
Yeah, I'm well aware of that. I lived in Austin for 20 years. So as high as those taxes sound, you may still be better off than a lot of us who are nailed with state (or in my case outrageous District) taxes.
__________________
Crewer
     
     
  #1323  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2006, 1:28 AM
LookingUp LookingUp is offline
Living in the sky.
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin - Boston
Posts: 131
Cheap Construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by crewer
I'm living in a highrise condo in DC. Seemed to be a very solid building when I moved in. Floors are all thick concrete with hardwood over them. But, let me tell you, I hear every step the woman above me makes with those heels of hers. I hear when a neighbor sneezes or snores, I hear the alarm clock in the unit across the hall in the morning, TV's in other units, and can even hear when someone's taking a leak in a neighboring unit.

I've had this discussion with friends living in other condo buildings throughout the metro region, and this has been a consistent complaint. Pretty much what we're finding is that building standards between condos and apartments are not that different.

Check out this article from a Minneapolis TV station: "Luxury" Condos Don't Always Turn Out That Way
Some of the newest condos claim to be high-quailty and "luxury," they are not - they're cheap apartments. This is what you can expect at Milago, Spring and Novare-360. They're "apartments," not luxury condos. Buyer beware.
     
     
  #1324  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2006, 3:46 AM
Atlriser's Avatar
Atlriser Atlriser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atlanta - Grant Park
Posts: 1,269
Cool Geez - Jerk alert!

Don't know who you are Lookingup....but growup a little. Yeah, I'm back. I don't work for Novare or any commercial lender period or even in condo/residential/highrise living construction. I DO have friends that live in Metropolis, Spire, Eclipse and waiting on a unit for Realm in Atlanta. All these buildings are nice/fine condo buildings with good amentities. Futhermore, the're all FINISHED! I myself would never live in a condo because I have a single family home and walk to Braves games and the zoo just blocks from my home. But you....let me say you are the most negative pessimistic sucker I've ever ran into in a forum.

Once again study your facts man... actually go to globest.com, the business chronicles for different cities, etc. Don't get on hear spouting ideas as if they were fact. I was looking because the newest highrise in Atlanta on Novare's site is about to break ground. Since I'm on this website because I am a skyscraper enthuasist and work in project management for a construction company (outside of residential), I happened to click on 360 and I've been following the project for over a year now through various construction sites and business journals. I really don't give a damn what you feel as to whether the units will be luxury or apartment. I simply know that Novare does do its homework in other southern cities. Seems to me from the other forum users the price points in Austin are almost identical to the majority of other southern cities. This being from $250 to $350. Now where in the hell you are getting this magical $400 number you keep quoting as if it's fact and from God, I remain baffled. Also, if you do know so much about highrise financing as you seem to think you do, YES, as a building rises, each floor becomes progressively more expensive. Hmm, could this be views? Could this be just common sense prevailing. I DO know here in Atlanta, once you go above the 10th to 15th floor of condo buildings, the prices typically increase between $2,000 to $5,000 per floor. This said, if a unit on the 10th floor was to cost $200,000. On the 20th, the same unit would be between $220,000 to $250,000 if not more. Hmmm, let me see, could this be because yet again in real estate, people pay for LOCATION. Last time I checked here in Atlanta and I'm sure Austin is the same, a 20th floor view is slightly more beautiful then a 10th floor view.

Futhermore, who has claimed any of these buildings being discussed here are LUXURY? Seems like they are all very standard grade in finishes and in construction materials used. Also, if you'd take 5 minutes to leave this site long enough to not gripe and attack, the websites that people list on here all pretty much say that the buildings under development and under construction all contain the same price points, finishes and amentities.

The question I was responding to was one raised by you as to whether Novare had financing. The answer actually appears to be unanswered, but also let me state, construction has definitely begun on 360. It's in many construction journals this month. Futhermore, I do know that Andrews teamed with Novare on this project. You yourself stated, that the land was provided by Andrews.....also let's see, you claim to be in finance....right? Well, hmm, usually land is the 1st prerequisite for obtaining financing. Go figure....yet again?! Furthermore, construction documents are required by lending institutes to perform appraisals, land values, expected sales, expected construction costs and so on. Furthermore, building permits definitely require completed construction documents....not to leave myself open for yet another one of your off the wall attacks and for those not in construction. Construction docs completed does not mean on a per unit 100% detail completion basis. However, it does mean complete land/site development, storm water (in big cities), structural, fire safety, MEP's and so forth.

I wish all the projects in Austin well. Luckily Atlanta has been spared cyclical real estate for most of its 140 year history, so I really can't comment on unbuilt facilities and high rises.... I only know of 1 in Atlanta that was started and sat vacant for about a year before another company came in and completed the condo midrise (12 floors) as apartments.

Now whether Novare has financing, Lookingup, I CAN'T tell you yes. All I was doing was giving my opinion of what Novare has done in Atlanta and that construction has begun without a doubt. As to Novare's internal workings and whether they finance initial construction costs I can't even begin to answer those questions. However, I believe they are a public company and would have to disclose such information in their quarterly statements, so being in finance, do a little research if you are capable and report back to the forum since it bothers you so much. If they aren't a public company, then I guess you'll just be unsure for a while.

As I stated, Austin will be happy to have this building on its skyline. One last note, in Atlanta, Novare never begins selling units until construction is well underway and the building is clearly out of the ground with cranes high in the air listing a website address down the spine of the crane. My opinion as to why, is because they use the rising building as it's own advertisement to generate buzz thus controlling their initial advertising dollar. Hmm, word of mouth, could that be it? Excitement about a new high rise, is that it?? I don't know, but I for one would feel better about placing a deposit on a condo (if I were going to) that was 10 stories high before sales began then on putting my money down because someone had a sales office and a picture of a building 'coming soon' with a bochure of how great the place was going to be.

My interest in Novare is because they have 6 building under development now in Atlanta. They are changing my city's skyline and I hope they continue to succeed so none of these projects are jeopardized because I love Atlanta and all the new highrises here. Their Centennial Hill development with twin 39 story towers and a 16 story hotel in the middle is in the smack middle of downtown coming into town on the connector and will be a huge addition right as you take the curve after 10th street. I want to see it finished and see what it adds to the city not to mention their many other buildings reshaping midtown. Given this is a skyscraper website, I would think that would be everyone's motive for discussions on here, but I guess being naive, other's MUST have hidden agenda's as you claim. Sorry to burst your bubble, but I'm just an enthusiast and was trying to be nice. My first trip to NY was tear filled last summer with 4 straight days of WALKING all of lower manhattan just looking up at all the tall buildings, that's why I'm here. THAT'S MY INTEREST AND MOTIVE LOOKINGUP! Thanks but I think you've pretty much proven your worth and leanings without typing anything further. In the future I'll try and remember not everyone is here because of a love of highrises and development.
     
     
  #1325  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2006, 4:33 AM
redirector redirector is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 12
Dept of Redundancy Dept Head -- LookingUp

Quote:
Originally Posted by LookingUp
Some of the newest condos claim to be high-quailty and "luxury," they are not - they're cheap apartments. This is what you can expect at Milago, Spring and Novare-360. They're "apartments," not luxury condos. Buyer beware.

AGAIN WITH THE "CHEAP"! Just when I think we're getting somewhere you revert to form.

As stated before, in reply to your earlier posts of this exact same nature, Milago never used the word "LUXURY" in any of their on-site literature. They are quality, contemporary, modern, urban condos on Town Lake. You are the one who continually applies the L-word to them, then knocks them down for something they have NEVER claimed. This is classic fake-strawman argumentation. Why you persist in this lying, rude manner is beyond me.

And to think you actually feel the need to warn potential buyers -- on a site like this -- about this? I think you must be trying to fulfill some superior need to be something you are not. We don't need you to save us buyers from any of your fake strawman arguments. Quit looking up, we're just getting shat upon constantly by this insufferable repetitive boorish bostonian.

Redirector

PS -- by the way, it was GREAT to see, and hear, the Austin Fourth of July Celebration fireworks over Zilker park, live, -- from my LIVING ROOM and terrace at Milago CONDOS tonight. God added his own thunder and lightning, so it was quite the show this year. Can't wait to see it from the rooftop next year.
     
     
  #1326  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2006, 4:52 PM
greenbelt's Avatar
greenbelt greenbelt is offline
hike and bike
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 344
Quote:
Originally Posted by crewer
I'm living in a highrise condo in DC. Seemed to be a very solid building when I moved in. Floors are all thick concrete with hardwood over them. But, let me tell you, I hear every step the woman above me makes with those heels of hers. I hear when a neighbor sneezes or snores, I hear the alarm clock in the unit across the hall in the morning, TV's in other units, and can even hear when someone's taking a leak in a neighboring unit.

I've had this discussion with friends living in other condo buildings throughout the metro region, and this has been a consistent complaint. Pretty much what we're finding is that building standards between condos and apartments are not that different.

Check out this article from a Minneapolis TV station: "Luxury" Condos Don't Always Turn Out That Way
Great article, and I can totally relate. My wife and I lived in a 900 sq foot loft in Deep Ellum, Dallas. It was an old GM parts plant back in the day. It was a 4 story brick building with thick concrete floors and 20ft ceils, and the lady's heels walking above us drove me nuts. I could hear everywhere she walked. I even confronted her about it in the elevator one day and about started a war. I mentioned casually, if when at home she wouldn't mind taking off her hard soled heels, especially late at night, and well, she stormed out and got even louder.

I'm ALL FOR THE HIGHRISES going up in Austin, it's going to look great, but unless I could trust a builder (test drive someone elses space) I'd probably never get myself back into one.

Last edited by greenbelt; Jul 5, 2006 at 7:56 PM.
     
     
  #1327  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2006, 8:49 PM
crewer crewer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Palm Springs, CA
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbelt
Great article, and I can totally relate. My wife and I lived in a 900 sq foot loft in Deep Ellum, Dallas. It was an old GM parts plant back in the day. It was a 4 story brick building with thick concrete floors and 20ft ceils, and the lady's heels walking above us drove me nuts. I could hear everywhere she walked. I even confronted her about it in the elevator one day and about started a war. I mentioned casually, if when at home she wouldn't mind taking off her hard soled heels, especially late at night, and well, she stormed out and got even louder.

I'm ALL FOR THE HIGHRISES going up in Austin, it's going to look great, but unless I could trust a builder (test drive someone elses space) I'd probably never get myself back into one.
The condo association here has rules in place for all residents with hardwood floors. 80% of your floors must be covered with rugs! I have them all over the place and make a point to take my shoes off when walking around my unit so as not to disturb the people below me. Wish the woman above would do the same.

Sorry to hear of that bad situation with your neighbor. It's a shame that people can be so amazingly insensitive and self-centered.
__________________
Crewer
     
     
  #1328  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2006, 11:41 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,320
Ugg, my situation has gotten bad.. both units next to me (above and one to the side) went rental in the last 5 months. TV noise is killing me. They rent so they dont mind shaking my walls, because what do they care they will be gone in 6 months? Guy upstairs builds bird houses and sells them on the internet, so I get to hear his powertools (WHICH HE KEEPS IN HIS KITCHEN!) until 11 at night.

Until 6 months ago we were 90% Owner Occupied and it was quite, we've dropped to 60% owner occupied with the concentration of renters near me. Now people steal my parking spot, have no problem standing in front of my door having a conversation..

Im even more worried because a couple of frat daddies are renting a unit near me. They havent moved in yet, but they do in a few weeks, and Im worried its going to get loud/parties. Ive never been the type of person to call the HOA manager on someone, but it could happen pretty quickly if this doenst improve.

I love the condo lifestyle and being so close to downtown.. but renters will KILL a condo.
     
     
  #1329  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2006, 12:09 AM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoOgE
Ugg, my situation has gotten bad.. both units next to me (above and one to the side) went rental in the last 5 months. TV noise is killing me. They rent so they dont mind shaking my walls, because what do they care they will be gone in 6 months? Guy upstairs builds bird houses and sells them on the internet, so I get to hear his powertools (WHICH HE KEEPS IN HIS KITCHEN!) until 11 at night.

Until 6 months ago we were 90% Owner Occupied and it was quite, we've dropped to 60% owner occupied with the concentration of renters near me. Now people steal my parking spot, have no problem standing in front of my door having a conversation..

Im even more worried because a couple of frat daddies are renting a unit near me. They havent moved in yet, but they do in a few weeks, and Im worried its going to get loud/parties. Ive never been the type of person to call the HOA manager on someone, but it could happen pretty quickly if this doenst improve.

I love the condo lifestyle and being so close to downtown.. but renters will KILL a condo.

What city are you in? You might consider pushing for some of your condo by-laws to be amended to include conditions concerning rental of units. You might even check your current ones. You might be surprised what you find.
     
     
  #1330  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2006, 12:47 AM
MichaelB MichaelB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North edge of Downtown
Posts: 3,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoOgE
Ugg, my situation has gotten bad.. both units next to me (above and one to the side) went rental in the last 5 months. TV noise is killing me. They rent so they dont mind shaking my walls, because what do they care they will be gone in 6 months? Guy upstairs builds bird houses and sells them on the internet, so I get to hear his powertools (WHICH HE KEEPS IN HIS KITCHEN!) until 11 at night.

Until 6 months ago we were 90% Owner Occupied and it was quite, we've dropped to 60% owner occupied with the concentration of renters near me. Now people steal my parking spot, have no problem standing in front of my door having a conversation..

Im even more worried because a couple of frat daddies are renting a unit near me. They havent moved in yet, but they do in a few weeks, and Im worried its going to get loud/parties. Ive never been the type of person to call the HOA manager on someone, but it could happen pretty quickly if this doenst improve.

I love the condo lifestyle and being so close to downtown.. but renters will KILL a condo.
I wouldn't think twice about having a manager keep rental residents within reasonable limits of association rules ...especiallyif it is changing the value of the property. Everybody gets to have a loud moment once in a while. But they need to be exceptions. Most buildings have rules about noise that comes from construction. 11pm is WAY too late. Actually, for many condos, runnings a business that resulting in the site becoming a manufacturing location is against the rules. Check it out. Chances are the owners who are renting the units need to notified that it is THEIR resopnsibility to educate their tennats about the association rules.

Good luck.....
     
     
  #1331  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2006, 1:01 AM
bluedogok's Avatar
bluedogok bluedogok is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 804
Quote:
Originally Posted by crewer
The condo association here has rules in place for all residents with hardwood floors. 80% of your floors must be covered with rugs! I have them all over the place and make a point to take my shoes off when walking around my unit so as not to disturb the people below me. Wish the woman above would do the same.

Sorry to hear of that bad situation with your neighbor. It's a shame that people can be so amazingly insensitive and self-centered.
If a built is built how it should be, this would not be a problem. There are many building techniques which can resolve a loud floor. Unfortunately in most cases the people doing the building (not the workers themselves, the people paying for the development) are not going to live in the building to have to put up with it. Most of them wouldn't put up with all of the problems that it seems y'all have to. That was one thing that always upsets me whenever I have to do inspections, I ask the contractor if he would put up with the same crappy construction that you are wanting me to approve in your own home? Most of the time they just back pedal. I hold my work up to that standard and I wish those making a (sometimes obscene) profit of others would hold themselves up to that standard.

That is one thing I like about a single family home, I will someday have my own land so I can do my woodworking or working on cars so as not to bother any neighbors around me. If we do move to Boston, that will be one thing that I will have to get used to.
     
     
  #1332  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2006, 1:18 AM
crewer crewer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Palm Springs, CA
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedogok
If a built is built how it should be, this would not be a problem. There are many building techniques which can resolve a loud floor. Unfortunately in most cases the people doing the building (not the workers themselves, the people paying for the development) are not going to live in the building to have to put up with it. Most of them wouldn't put up with all of the problems that it seems y'all have to. That was one thing that always upsets me whenever I have to do inspections, I ask the contractor if he would put up with the same crappy construction that you are wanting me to approve in your own home? Most of the time they just back pedal. I hold my work up to that standard and I wish those making a (sometimes obscene) profit of others would hold themselves up to that standard.
Yep, integrity is not a common word among a lot of developers. It's funny to hear you say that, though. Years ago I bought a condo in Austin and was having all that popcorn crap scraped off the ceiling so that it could be floated out before installing crown molding. The man redoing the ceilings told me he was one of the original builders who worked on my complex back in the 1970's. He told me that the common phrase among his crew was that they were building the slums of tomorrow. In other words, they were expected to do such shoddy work that unless homeowners worked to keep the place up, it would all fall apart.

Judging from all the problems I had with that condo, I think he hit the nail on the head.
__________________
Crewer
     
     
  #1333  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2006, 1:33 AM
crewer crewer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Palm Springs, CA
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedogok
If a built is built how it should be, this would not be a problem. There are many building techniques which can resolve a loud floor. Unfortunately in most cases the people doing the building (not the workers themselves, the people paying for the development) are not going to live in the building to have to put up with it. Most of them wouldn't put up with all of the problems that it seems y'all have to. That was one thing that always upsets me whenever I have to do inspections, I ask the contractor if he would put up with the same crappy construction that you are wanting me to approve in your own home? Most of the time they just back pedal. I hold my work up to that standard and I wish those making a (sometimes obscene) profit of others would hold themselves up to that standard.
Yep, integrity is not a common word among a lot of developers. It's funny to hear you say that, though. Years ago I bought a condo in Austin and was having all that popcorn crap scraped off the ceiling so that it could be floated out before installing crown molding. The man redoing the ceilings told me he was one of the original builders who worked on my complex back in the 1970's. He told me that the common phrase among his crew was that they were building the slums of tomorrow. In other words, they were expected to do such shoddy work that unless homeowners worked to keep the place up, it would all fall apart.

Judging from all the problems I had with that condo, I think he hit the nail on the head.
__________________
Crewer
     
     
  #1334  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2006, 1:40 AM
bluedogok's Avatar
bluedogok bluedogok is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 804
That is the sad things about the big houses built nowadays, they are built by the same crews doing the "cheap" homes with about the same quality. There used to be a difference between a "custom" home and a tract home, since the coditization of home building there is virtually no difference.
     
     
  #1335  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2006, 2:35 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin<--->Birmingham<--->Atlanta
Posts: 55,831
Here is a sort of timeline of these buildings to see their phases.

One Commodore, (also known as 800 Brazos). They added a wing onto it in 1984 to the northern end of it. The pic below is what it originally looked like prior to 1984.


This is what it looks like today. I took this shot from the 26th floor of the One American Center last year. It's the short brown building with the vertical windows.


Here is what it will look like after the planned renovation.


And, this is the Capitol Tower from the same location.


And what it will look like after the new crown.
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
     
     
  #1336  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2006, 2:50 AM
crewer crewer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Palm Springs, CA
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas
Here is a sort of timeline of these buildings to see their phases...

And what it will look like after the new crown.
I'm not getting this new top. Is it possible that it has a practical purpose? It almost looks like a huge solar panel.
__________________
Crewer
     
     
  #1337  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2006, 3:52 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin<--->Birmingham<--->Atlanta
Posts: 55,831
^ I've wondered about that myself. The architecture firm that they've chosen to design the new top, is based in Austin, and has done "green buildings" before. So who knows, it may have solar panels. Austin already has a few such buildings, the convention center does also. And I believe the city hall has some as well. rjlevins, do you know about this? Goldenboot? One of the companies listed at the city's website that worked on city hall was a firm that installs solar panels.
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
     
     
  #1338  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2006, 4:09 AM
bluedogok's Avatar
bluedogok bluedogok is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 804
It may also be for some "cool roof" LEED points. Johns-Mansville has some "Cool Roof" products/system that is suppose to help lower the roof temp and cooling requirements. Not sure as I haven't had the chance to get into that much.
     
     
  #1339  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2006, 4:12 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin<--->Birmingham<--->Atlanta
Posts: 55,831
The article also mentioned something about mechanical systems being updated. That would include air conditioning wouldn't it?
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
     
     
  #1340  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2006, 3:05 PM
MichaelB MichaelB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North edge of Downtown
Posts: 3,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas
The article also mentioned something about mechanical systems being updated. That would include air conditioning wouldn't it?
And now from the artsy crowd..... I think it has potential... it turns a plain building into a base for something that is suclptural. It could also create a great pavillion on top of the building with a killer capitol view!
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:10 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.