HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #13281  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2011, 4:16 PM
george's Avatar
george george is offline
dream fast
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: east village, chicago
Posts: 3,291
I like the 1958 curtain wall. It's a classic retro 50's touch to the Avenue similar to Borg Warner. Lose that and it's gone. Or bring back the original design, what would most likely never happen, cost factors & all glass facades rule.

Topshop Sept 2011, coming soon.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13282  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2011, 5:27 PM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,608
Article on what may happen to the old Jones Prep site:
http://chicagojournal.com/News/08-10...s_College_Prep
__________________
flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13283  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2011, 5:36 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,388
^Infuriates me. All the community organizations begged the city to straighten out Harrison when they were selling the parking lot to University Center. Couldn't be done, they said. Though an 18-story building was fine, parents would never allow their kids to live in a 20-story building.

Now they want to tear down a perfectly good school and build yet another pointless little dog poop park in a terrible location. Why? So they can straighten out Harrison. Something about this smells funny.

Last edited by Mr Downtown; Aug 12, 2011 at 5:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13284  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2011, 8:01 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,413
What's fishy? Haithcock obviously didn't care about straightening Harrison, but didn't want to ruffle any feathers by making demands of the University Center developer. Fioretti sees the straightening as more of a priority, and he feels more comfortable exercising leverage over CPS.

The design of the new segment of Harrison could be problematic. What's to become of the little triangles of land to the north and south of the new alignment? I can only hope the city doesn't try to cram parking spaces there. In New York or Tokyo, those would become developable parcels, but that's way too much to hope for in Chicago...

I'm also disappointed in the park usage. The site isn't big enough for a soccer field or football field. These greenspaces usually fail utterly. The only successful one I can think of is in Battery Park City, where careful attention was paid to the edge condition, which maintained the urban feeling of the street while allowing the sports field to become secure (and protect against fly balls).
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13285  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2011, 10:17 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,388
^Neither Haithcock nor Fioretti have been part of any of these discussions. Fioretti is opposed to demolishing the current Jones HS.

The corner of State and Harrison is no place for a park, especially a stupid little leftover parcel type of park. There should be buildings holding those corners and signaling to motorists that they're in downtown, dammit.

Last edited by Mr Downtown; Aug 13, 2011 at 3:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13286  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2011, 5:40 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,413
I don't like the park any more than you do. But if it's a done deal, we might as well push for design that doesn't completely ruin the coherent urban streetscape of Printers' Row.6
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13287  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2011, 12:03 PM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
Huh? Mr Downtown aren't you the one (or was it Viva) who told us a year or two ago that some memorial or some similar small specifically themed use like that was supposed to go on the post-rerouted NW corner of Harrison & State - which is why there is already an oddly large unbuilt space on that NW corner today.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13288  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2011, 1:58 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,388
The city wanted the Burger King gone, so they came up with the idea of a veterans memorial at the SWC Congress & State. Some of us thought that was a terrible idea, because Congress should have buildings squeezing in on it to cue motorists that they're not on the expressway any more. Eventually someone at DPD engineered a land swap so Library Tower could be on the corner at Congress and the little park moved south to the NWC Harrison & State. The condo treated it as a private dog run for a few months, but now it's locked open. The idea that it's a memorial seems to have disappeared along the way.

PIMSY (Park in My Side Yard) campaigns are just as injurious to the city as NIMBY campaigns. No one will ever speak out against a park, of course (except Edgewater condo owners). But parks should be large enough to be more than dog toilets, should have good mid-day sun exposure, and should be properly fronted by buildings and streets. Things like Pritzker Park or even Printers Row Park make me mad. Where a city's parks go should not be determined by who previously rented the building on that lot. Instead, resell those sites as development parcels and purchase the land that would actually make a good park (such as the parking lot at SEC Harrison & Dearborn).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13289  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2011, 7:54 PM
pilsenarch pilsenarch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 888
Hey Mr. D.

I gotta say this is one of the few times I agree with you. Having said that, I don't think the SW corner of Harrison and State is a good location of a park either. Yes, it would function better then the 'dog poop' park (hehe) at Harrison and State but Printer's Row deserves a dense mid-rise residential project at that site to match the historic neighbors, IMO
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13290  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2011, 3:17 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,388
If you'd been in control in 1977 where would you have put a park to serve Printers Row?

The reason I like the ParkOne lot is that it's properly lined by streets and fronted by buildings, has sun nearly all day, and is big enough to function as a real town plaza. I would elevate it four feet from street level and put two levels of parking underneath.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13291  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2011, 7:38 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
The corner of State and Harrison is no place for a park, especially a stupid little leftover parcel type of park. There should be buildings holding those corners and signaling to motorists that they're in downtown, dammit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown
PIMSY (Park in My Side Yard) campaigns are just as injurious to the city as NIMBY campaigns.
+1. Couldn't possibly agree more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13292  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2011, 12:02 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Museum of Broadcast Communications











__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13293  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2011, 4:19 AM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryc View Post
I assume these are for ivy or some other covering? Because otherwise they will get grimy pretty soon and power washing them (if aerial power washing even exists) will not get at the numerous nooks and crannies - to say nothing of all the excellent pigeon perches.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13294  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2011, 5:02 AM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,492
How is a pigeon going to perch on that? They like ledges, not vertical metal mesh walls. I don't think the fat pigeons downtown could even land on that if they wanted to. The only birds you'll see on that (if you ever even see it) are sparrows and chick-a-dees or maybe a nuthatch if one even gets lost and makes it downtown without death ramming a window... I'm more worried about the inevitable dents and bent wires that will occur in the mesh, especially considering the stuff is already deforming at the top left of the lower section pictured above.

Anyhow, we've certainly been getting our fair share of buildings with metal mesh facade treatments lately haven't we?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13295  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2011, 5:39 AM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,289
I was going to comment on the wire panels a week or two ago after walking by them a few times.

I don't like them. They look ok from far away. But up close they look awful. They are going to stain and get bent.....just like the other wire and extruded metal panel walls in the city. I'll be sure to snap some photos of these places. This is why I am very concerned about the poetry foundation building, which lacks a protective base. Glazing, wood, stone, brick and concrete are far more forgiving to stuff being rammed or scraped against them. In this case, it's up high so all we really have to be concerned about is staining and sagging.

The rest of the building looks very nice though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13296  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2011, 7:18 AM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
How is a pigeon going to perch on that?
I was referring to the ledge parts. I can't tell what kind of bird could fit on them, but there is a little more room on the ends if the critter stands sideways. Also presumably on the topmost ledge where there is no mesh in the way.

^ Hayward, are you talking about rust or some other kind of staining? Is it the case that you can avoid rusting by using stainless steel for most components, but that with bolts and nuts (or other significant load-bearing tiny parts) you're stuck with something that will rust?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13297  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2011, 1:08 PM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by denizen467 View Post
I was referring to the ledge parts. I can't tell what kind of bird could fit on them, but there is a little more room on the ends if the critter stands sideways. Also presumably on the topmost ledge where there is no mesh in the way.

^ Hayward, are you talking about rust or some other kind of staining? Is it the case that you can avoid rusting by using stainless steel for most components, but that with bolts and nuts (or other significant load-bearing tiny parts) you're stuck with something that will rust?
It won't rust, rather I was referring to grime staining up the surface. Think of it like fingerprints on a stainless steel fridge. The grease and dust collect and give a brown stain.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13298  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2011, 3:34 AM
EarlyBuyer's Avatar
EarlyBuyer EarlyBuyer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 885
Thanks for the detailed update shots of the Broadcast Museum harry. What a (long overdue) improvement to what sat there for years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13299  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2011, 7:21 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,949
http://www.archpaper.com/news/articles.asp?id=5573

ROOM TO OPERATE
McCaffery & Antunovich reimagine Children's Hospital site in Lincoln Park.
Tom Stoelker 08.16.2011


...The architect said that the hospital’s 800 parking spaces would likely remain, though neighbors can hope for a spruced up version of the garage with street level retail. The modern white brick buildings will probably be torn down to make way for residential properties, more retail, and “special gathering places.” The heights of the new buildings are not expected to exceed those there now.

...Meanwhile, the architects have been pouring over historic photos of lost detailing on the older red-brick buildings on the site. Antunovich said restoring those elements was a way to reach out to the community almost immediately.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13300  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2011, 10:01 PM
george's Avatar
george george is offline
dream fast
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: east village, chicago
Posts: 3,291
Love that last water tower/ robot shot, harry.^
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:10 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.