HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1301  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2022, 2:54 AM
Loco101's Avatar
Loco101 Loco101 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Timmins, Northern Ontario
Posts: 7,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
It’s no longer in the map in my signature but thankfully I have taken a screenshot of it before:
Now that is interesting! But wouldn't happen unless we had 3 or 4 times our current population.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1302  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2022, 2:57 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loco101 View Post
Now that is interesting! But wouldn't happen unless we had 3 or 4 times our current population.
Considering that for the last 40 years the population has been slowly shrinking, unless some major boom happens to draw ~100,000 people, sadly that won't happen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1303  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2022, 3:12 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
Considering that for the last 40 years the population has been slowly shrinking, unless some major boom happens to draw ~100,000 people, sadly that won't happen.
Not necessarily. Kenora Bypass is pretty “outlandish” given its only 15.1K population.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1304  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2022, 3:14 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Not necessarily. Kenora Bypass is pretty “outlandish” given its only 15.1K population.
The thing is, Timmins is more of a destination than a point on the map you must go through.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1305  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2022, 3:21 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
The thing is, Timmins is more of a destination than a point on the map you must go through.
Our fellow SSPers from Winnipeg may disagree.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1306  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2022, 3:36 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Our fellow SSPers from Winnipeg may disagree.
What I mean is that Timmins is not on a major highway. It is off of the nearest major highway (11). Where as Kenora was directly on A major highway (17).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1307  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2022, 4:06 PM
thewave46 thewave46 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,530
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
What I mean is that Timmins is not on a major highway. It is off of the nearest major highway (11). Where as Kenora was directly on A major highway (17).
This.

Looking at Timmins, there are 4 routes in and out:

101 East
101 West
144 South
655 North

Unless one is coming from the north or east and headed to Sudbury via 144 (or vice-versa) transiting through Timmins is not usually a requirement. Highway 11 serves as the major axis of transportation in the region.

I can’t imagine there is lots of through traffic to other places because they are mostly small towns.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1308  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2022, 4:22 PM
thewave46 thewave46 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,530
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Not necessarily. Kenora Bypass is pretty “outlandish” given its only 15.1K population.
There are tons of small towns that were bypassed by the 401. Bypasses aren’t just a function of town size, but the ratio of local to through traffic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1309  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2022, 5:09 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by thewave46 View Post
This.

Looking at Timmins, there are 4 routes in and out:

101 East
101 West
144 South
655 North

Unless one is coming from the north or east and headed to Sudbury via 144 (or vice-versa) transiting through Timmins is not usually a requirement. Highway 11 serves as the major axis of transportation in the region.

Although the first 3 are Kings Highways, they are not major in th sense of cross Canada traffic. That is why Timmins is a destination.

I can’t imagine there is lots of through traffic to other places because they are mostly small towns.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thewave46 View Post
There are tons of small towns that were bypassed by the 401. Bypasses aren’t just a function of town size, but the ratio of local to through traffic.
This is the more important reason bypasses are made. This also goes back to the 407 should be made mandatory for all commercial traffic that does not end within the area south of it.
You would see 2 things come from that:
1) Much more congestion on the 407
2) A push for lower, if not no tolls on the 407.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1310  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2022, 5:17 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
And, to the dismay of some of you, the 413…
By the way, on my way to the outlet mall at Halton Hills last night, I saw a sign saying “future site of Highway 413” around Highway 401 WB Exit 330.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1311  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2022, 5:21 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
And, to the dismay of some of you, the 413…
By the way, on my way to the outlet mall at Halton Hills last night, I saw a sign saying “future site of Highway 413” around Highway 401 WB Exit 330.
They wouldn't need 413 if they removed tolls from the 407.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1312  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2022, 6:01 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,730
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
This is the more important reason bypasses are made. This also goes back to the 407 should be made mandatory for all commercial traffic that does not end within the area south of it.
How would this be enforced? I don't think it could be done.

The only way a bypass could work this way is if it had very limited interchanges.

If the government really wants the 413 to be such a route, then that's how it should be designed. But I doubt it will be any different than other major highways with respect to having interchanges at arterials which cross it; there will be too much outcry from "folks" living along the route and especially "friends" with business interests that depend on the access.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1313  
Old Posted May 1, 2022, 12:38 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamingViking View Post
How would this be enforced? I don't think it could be done.

The only way a bypass could work this way is if it had very limited interchanges.

If the government really wants the 413 to be such a route, then that's how it should be designed. But I doubt it will be any different than other major highways with respect to having interchanges at arterials which cross it; there will be too much outcry from "folks" living along the route and especially "friends" with business interests that depend on the access.
Easy way, have inspection stations just past the exit for the 407on the 400 series highways.If their manifest is a place out of the 407 area, fine them for not using the designated route. Don't need it to be much more than that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1314  
Old Posted May 3, 2022, 3:50 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,730
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
Easy way, have inspection stations just past the exit for the 407on the 400 series highways.If their manifest is a place out of the 407 area, fine them for not using the designated route. Don't need it to be much more than that.
The expense of setting up and operating more inspection stations would be big, never mind being able to find the space for them along sections of the 400-series network that have denser land uses (or sites that won't cause traffic/safety issues).

Many trucks have GPS units now, but to use them for billing and fines would probably create a whole mess of legal issues.

I think it would be better to incentivize the through-trucks to use the 407, rather than try to penalize them for not using it.

Last edited by ScreamingViking; May 3, 2022 at 4:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1315  
Old Posted May 3, 2022, 3:55 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamingViking View Post
But we would want to inspect trucks that are going through the GTA and not using the 407... isn't that your idea? To make the through-trucks use the 407, as a bypass?

So you'd have to inspect the ones that aren't using it, travelling the other 400-series highways and arterials to get from one side of the GTA to another.

The expense of setting up and operating more inspection stations (never mind finding the space for them along sections of the 400-series network that have denser land uses) would be big.

Many trucks have GPS units now, but to use them for billing and fines would probably create a whole mess of legal issues.

I think it would be better to incentivize the through-trucks to use the 407, rather than penalize them for not using it.
I am guessing you have never heard of a fine. It is a monetary amount of sufficient value that deters undesirable actions from happening.

There is the space at 401 E, 401 W, and QEW T. 404 S and 400 S would be a challenge. The other 400 series seem to be easy enough.

Think of these not just checking your destination, but also checking the usual things. They wouldn't even need to be open 24/7.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1316  
Old Posted May 3, 2022, 11:08 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
I am guessing you have never heard of a fine. It is a monetary amount of sufficient value that deters undesirable actions from happening.

There is the space at 401 E, 401 W, and QEW T. 404 S and 400 S would be a challenge. The other 400 series seem to be easy enough.

Think of these not just checking your destination, but also checking the usual things. They wouldn't even need to be open 24/7.
Next thing you know, all the GTA municipalities will complain about truck convoys roaming on their roads. Those subscribed to Vision Zero will lose their sh*t.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1317  
Old Posted May 3, 2022, 2:22 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Next thing you know, all the GTA municipalities will complain about truck convoys roaming on their roads. Those subscribed to Vision Zero will lose their sh*t.
I am guessing you also have never heard of a fine. Please see above.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1318  
Old Posted May 3, 2022, 2:59 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
I am guessing you also have never heard of a fine. Please see above.
Let’s just say, MTO, OPP and GTA municipal police don’t have that much time to burn, so asking them to patrol all 400-series expressway and neighbouring EDRs is impractical. This is not the Territorial District of Sudbury…
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1319  
Old Posted May 3, 2022, 5:08 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Let’s just say, MTO, OPP and GTA municipal police don’t have that much time to burn, so asking them to patrol all 400-series expressway and neighbouring EDRs is impractical. This is not the Territorial District of Sudbury…
Hire more officers with the money from the fines.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1320  
Old Posted May 3, 2022, 5:35 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Another option is a commercial vehicle congestion charge within the 407 that is higher than the cost of end to end use of the 407. Easier to set up. Easier to enforce.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:51 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.