We have nothing to prove on whether he is a rioter or not. We also have little proof on what angle the camera is shooting from. Was he walking to the police or simply walking across an empty space in the crowd?
He seemed pretty innocent too. The fence falling down beside him startled him, which made him turn with an honest look of surprise for a moment; he may have not actually noticed he was walking into a crowd of police. Such confusion on where things are in such a riot/crowding in downtown would've been common. I've heard from people who have tried to escape the riot; you would get squashed, punched, strangled, and if lucky, pulled out by a nice man or a group of policemen. I wasn't there, but from what I heard, it was definitely not easy to get around or know what you were walking into.
The only thing I'm pointing out is that people can retaliate as such on police actions. I wouldn't be surprised to see at least one lawsuit come up concerning the actions of the police; it happened in 94. If we knew he was a rioter & an offender, I would have no sympathy for the man who took it in the groin, but that was not the main point I was trying to make.
Quote:
|
The police issued plenty of warnings throughout the night that if people didn't leave they would be gassed or banged. Every block they went they announced "move it or lose it"(paraphrased) before taking action. There were times when people would taunt the police and it actually makes me sad that they weren't shot with rubber bullets or bean bags or bitten by the dogs.
|
There was a lot of confusion about transit into and/or out of Vancouver, with many people convinced that outbound transit wasn't operating, despite efforts to let people know about it. For a couple of people I knew, me contacing them about the issue through text/social networking was the only way that they were able to know how/where to go in that big mess. Being at home and having a couple of monitors devoted to news videos & images does help out sometimes I guess. And with the noise and the crowdedness, you honestly can't expect to always be able to hear the police either when they say "move it or lose it".
Quote:
|
the on the street reporter said he had a group of guys come up to them and whine about how the police treated them and so the reporter said back to them "what do you expect" you were involved in a riot - or something to that affect - and the guys had no response and just walked away - they were desperately wanting sympathy
|
Do we have any proof that these people were among the rioters? There were many innocent people in the mix of rioters, desperately trying to claw their way out of the city and into safety. With the mess that downtown was, it was likely hard to tell who was actually innocent and who wasn't. Many people may have been very much mistreated by
both parties (rioters and police).
--------
It also seems social networking is playing a big part in identifying rioters this time around. I've heard of Jason Li already through the Post-riot clean-up page. People were being reported everywhere. We definitely didn't have that back in 94. Might make people more scared to initiate in riot as such, now that they can be easily identified.