HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1281  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2014, 6:39 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cowtropolis
Posts: 20,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Urbanist View Post
I ran into one of major stakeholders of the Stampede grounds and he confirmed that the new arena+stadium will be located near the grounds. He wouldn't tell me where exactly, but I almost jumped up and hugged him.
That would be great. My first own first choice would be somewhere near the Stampede grounds.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1282  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2014, 6:42 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Mine as well. That block along the tracks would be PERFECT. A great way to connect Inglewood and Ramsay into the inner city. Hopefully this is the case, as it may push forward the development of the Orchard Towers, and possibly the Club Sport and Stampede Hotel. Another effect of this may lead to having the future SE LRT burried under 12th and the Elbow River, with a station near the stadium, and coming above ground on 9th Ave in Inglewood.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1283  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2014, 7:29 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by bt04ku View Post
I've always attributed the secrecy and delays because the Flames owners want to upstage the Oilers for the arena; see what they come up with, then build a better one. Given that the arena will be the 'jewel' and drive the success of the business, any talk of a McMahon replacement would get put on the backburner.
With all due respect to our Edmontonian friends on SSP and elsewhere... I really don't think the Flames are worried about competing with what they're doing up there. And there just isn't the same competition between the 2 cities in recent years, for a variety of reasons.


Quote:
And just because I always love Olympic speculation even though I just don't believe it, that would definitely change the whole dynamic of funding and long term planning significantly. 2026 would be the time to go for it, even if it is only 16 years after Vancouver. Asia and Europe get the next two (or Asia-Asia I guess if Almaty can pull it off, but I think it's Oslo's to lose) which opens the door for another North American bid. Quebec City seems dead in the water given the problems with a ski hill so it really depends on what the US plans on doing, whether it be to make a bid for the Winter games or make a push for the 2024/2028 Summer games.
My bet's on the US going for the summer games next. They're far more prestigious for an alpha country. So presuming Americas winter games.. I think Calgary has one hell of a good chance. It's been talked about quietly for a while now, and a few new facilities is all we really need. 1988 still rings strongly in the memories of a lot of people around the sports world.
__________________
Suburbs are the friends with benefits of the housing world.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1284  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2014, 10:52 PM
VIce VIce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
With all due respect to our Edmontonian friends on SSP and elsewhere... I really don't think the Flames are worried about competing with what they're doing up there. And there just isn't the same competition between the 2 cities in recent years, for a variety of reasons.




My bet's on the US going for the summer games next. They're far more prestigious for an alpha country. So presuming Americas winter games.. I think Calgary has one hell of a good chance. It's been talked about quietly for a while now, and a few new facilities is all we really need. 1988 still rings strongly in the memories of a lot of people around the sports world.
So what's really needed? Major upgrades to ski jumping and long-track facilities, possibly a new bobsled run. But other than that? A new stadium/arena complex gives you an opening/closing ceremonies venue and a primary ice surface; the Saddledome gives one of the most fully-featured secondary ice surfaces at an Olympics. Then its just temporary facilities for media and fans everywhere else. COP could certainly accommodate freestyle and snowboarding, even though neither were in the '88 program.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1285  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2014, 10:55 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
We would also need a new Olympic Village constructed.

It would be my hope that the village would be constructed on the remaining surface lots along the tracks, including an extremely long park decking over the tracks. Perhaps combined with a High Speed Rail/C-train Transit hub station.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1286  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2014, 10:59 PM
Full Mountain's Avatar
Full Mountain Full Mountain is offline
YIMBY
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by VIce View Post
So what's really needed? Major upgrades to ski jumping and long-track facilities, possibly a new bobsled run. But other than that? A new stadium/arena complex gives you an opening/closing ceremonies venue and a primary ice surface; the Saddledome gives one of the most fully-featured secondary ice surfaces at an Olympics. Then its just temporary facilities for media and fans everywhere else. COP could certainly accommodate freestyle and snowboarding, even though neither were in the '88 program.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
We would also need a new Olympic Village constructed.

It would be my hope that the village would be constructed on the remaining surface lots along the tracks, including an extremely long park decking over the tracks. Perhaps combined with a High Speed Rail/C-train Transit hub station.
You would need a ($$$$) train from Calgary to the mountain venues, just about guaranteed that any bid without it would fail.
__________________
Incremental Photo - @PhotogX_1

Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are my own not those of any affiliated organizations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1287  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2014, 11:10 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Totally We could do an HSR from Edmonton to Calgary (with stops at both airports and Red Deer) and Calgary to Banff (with a stop in Canmore) or even to Lake Louise... as one complete contiguous line.


It would be nice to connect the capital to the mountains like that.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1288  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2014, 12:44 AM
McMurph McMurph is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Mountain View Post
You would need a ($$$$) train from Calgary to the mountain venues, just about guaranteed that any bid without it would fail.
While I'd love to have a proper passenger train to the mountains, I find it hard to believe that it would be a requirement for a successful bid. Vancouver didn't have a particularly effective rail connection and their road to Whistler is far worse than our road to the Rockies. Buses might not be sexy but they can move a hell of a lot of people, especially on our roads. And HSR westwards ain't going happen. Ever.

As for the arena / stadium, I like the idea of victoria park over the west end. I was down that way today and was trying to imagine how it would work. Could both fit in the railtown lands between 4th street and the river, or would the stadium have to go by the tracks and the arena sit on an adjoining parcel to the south? Can anyone sketch up the potential footprints?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1289  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2014, 6:38 AM
bt04ku's Avatar
bt04ku bt04ku is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 291
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
With all due respect to our Edmontonian friends on SSP and elsewhere... I really don't think the Flames are worried about competing with what they're doing up there. And there just isn't the same competition between the 2 cities in recent years, for a variety of reasons.
Maybe not the cities, but these are pro sports organizations competing against each other who want to be as best off the ice as on the ice. I have to think it's played a part. Some big egos with a lot of money.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1290  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2014, 6:41 AM
bt04ku's Avatar
bt04ku bt04ku is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 291
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Totally We could do an HSR from Edmonton to Calgary (with stops at both airports and Red Deer) and Calgary to Banff (with a stop in Canmore) or even to Lake Louise... as one complete contiguous line.


It would be nice to connect the capital to the mountains like that.
The Calgary-Edmonton connection could be part of their Commonwealth Games bid, Calgary-Lake Louise would be our Olympic Bid.

Combine all that with a 2026 FIFA World Cup bid and we've got ourselves a federal spending spree like you've never seen before.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1291  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2014, 1:09 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Count me in as another vote for putting the new arena on a portion of the Remington Railtown lands in East Beltline. Remington seems to take his sweet time building anything on his property (see Meredith block and its glacial progress) so this would be a great way to take a chunk of that land off his hands and get things built on it. At the same time East Village is building up, East Beltline keeps chugging along and Stampede can get a piece of the action with their 4th street project (Stampede Trail) finally moving ahead just south of the site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1292  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2014, 1:35 PM
Riise's Avatar
Riise Riise is offline
City Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary | London
Posts: 3,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by bt04ku View Post
Oh this is fantastic news. Everything about a Vic Park arena is better than the West Village. Better for transit users...
Wouldn't an arena in the West Village basically be on the doorsteps of Sunalata Station?


Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
I'm personally putting even odds on us doing an Olympics bid in the very near future. For a games possibly sooner than most people think. And I bet we'd win. There's a lot of pro-Canada in the Olympic realm right now, it's the perfect time to strike.
Does this include the politics/corruption that unfortunately clouds international sports? Canada deffo has great momentum with regards to the Olympics but these bodies are so self-serving/hireable.


Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
With all due respect to our Edmontonian friends on SSP and elsewhere... I really don't think the Flames are worried about competing with what they're doing up there.
While they probably wouldn't mind one-upping them, I think the focus will be on winning over customers.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
We would also need a new Olympic Village constructed.

It would be my hope that the village would be constructed on the remaining surface lots along the tracks, including an extremely long park decking over the tracks. Perhaps combined with a High Speed Rail/C-train Transit hub station.
What about Westbrook? It could really generate some action on a site that is both well-connected and easy to secure.
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”
- Roberta Brandes Gratz
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1293  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2014, 1:37 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,596
What about the block for the mall, what is it First? Would provide a nice flow of people even if the engineering would push the cost up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1294  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2014, 2:55 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riise View Post
What about Westbrook? It could really generate some action on a site that is both well-connected and easy to secure.
I don't understand... why would we put the village kilometers away from any of the sport venues with only one transit connection to the major areas of the city, when we have several kilometers worth of developable land on both sides of the tracks, in the centre of downtown, right next to either of the proposed stadium sites.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1295  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2014, 3:45 PM
Riise's Avatar
Riise Riise is offline
City Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary | London
Posts: 3,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
I don't understand... why would we put the village kilometers away from any of the sport venues with only one transit connection to the major areas of the city, when we have several kilometers worth of developable land on both sides of the tracks, in the centre of downtown, right next to either of the proposed stadium sites.
In terms of proximity to venues, Westbrook will not be directly next to a venue but there would be numerous venues spread across the region so I don't see not being next to one venue as that big of a disadvantage. Additionally, the area surrounding Westbrook does not suffer from nearly as much congestion as the area around Railtown. It would most likely be much easier to move coach loads of athletes in and out of a village in Westbrook than Railtown during peak-periods.

While some athletes will take transit, I think the future residents are the ones that will most benefit from the site being a TOD. Consequently, only being served by the Blue Line isn't much of an issue.

In terms of development, we're starting to fill out Central Calgary at a decent pace. While I personally see the benefits of concentrating development in one area, an Athletes' Village does provide an excellent opportunity to ignite development in area that is struggling to attract regeneration. A good portion of Westbrook could be developed in one go and benefit from being a comprehensive state led and built development; it could be a great project to solicit additional buy-in into the TOD concept.
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”
- Roberta Brandes Gratz
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1296  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2014, 3:54 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,596
Depending on the number of hotels that are finished likely have to do a media village as well. Not sure if BMO is big enough to act as the media centre. I would think so but who knows.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1297  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2014, 3:58 PM
Spring2008 Spring2008 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lower Mount Royal, Calgary
Posts: 5,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riise View Post

In terms of development, we're starting to fill out Central Calgary at a decent pace. While I personally see the benefits of concentrating development in one area, an Athletes' Village does provide an excellent opportunity to ignite development in area that is struggling to attract regeneration. A good portion of Westbrook could be developed in one go and benefit from being a comprehensive state led and built development; it could be a great project to solicit additional buy-in into the TOD concept.
Same could be said about the West Village (Sunalta)area which is closer to the core.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1298  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2014, 4:40 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by VIce View Post
So what's really needed? Major upgrades to ski jumping and long-track facilities, possibly a new bobsled run. But other than that? A new stadium/arena complex gives you an opening/closing ceremonies venue and a primary ice surface; the Saddledome gives one of the most fully-featured secondary ice surfaces at an Olympics. Then its just temporary facilities for media and fans everywhere else. COP could certainly accommodate freestyle and snowboarding, even though neither were in the '88 program.
Basically you've covered it. New stadium/arena are the big ticket items, and both are months if not weeks away from announcements. 5-8 years before completion, depending on a whole host of factors. Lines up pretty nicely with an aggressive Oly bid.

Louise and Nakiska give us plenty of space for any and all alpine events, regardless of what new things get added to the dance card. Especially because half of this is pioneered/competed at Louise already.
__________________
Suburbs are the friends with benefits of the housing world.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1299  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2014, 4:40 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Mountain View Post
You would need a ($$$$) train from Calgary to the mountain venues, just about guaranteed that any bid without it would fail.
Vancouver has a train between the city and Whistler?
__________________
Suburbs are the friends with benefits of the housing world.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1300  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2014, 5:06 PM
Full Mountain's Avatar
Full Mountain Full Mountain is offline
YIMBY
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by McMurph View Post
While I'd love to have a proper passenger train to the mountains, I find it hard to believe that it would be a requirement for a successful bid. Vancouver didn't have a particularly effective rail connection and their road to Whistler is far worse than our road to the Rockies. Buses might not be sexy but they can move a hell of a lot of people, especially on our roads. And HSR westwards ain't going happen. Ever.

As for the arena / stadium, I like the idea of victoria park over the west end. I was down that way today and was trying to imagine how it would work. Could both fit in the railtown lands between 4th street and the river, or would the stadium have to go by the tracks and the arena sit on an adjoining parcel to the south? Can anyone sketch up the potential footprints?
You have to remember the Olympics are a game of one-up-manship, Sochi had a train all future bids will now need trains that are faster and better. People aren't going to sit on a bus for 1-2hrs to get to the mountains (sure it was great in '88, attention spans are far shorter now). People aren't going to want to commit to a full day in the mountains, get it down to a 30 min train trip people can go see a alpine event in the morning and a speed skating or hockey event in the afternoon and 1.5hr bus ride doesn't allow that in the same way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
Vancouver has a train between the city and Whistler?
No but Sochi did, see above re: one-up-manship
__________________
Incremental Photo - @PhotogX_1

Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are my own not those of any affiliated organizations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:54 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.