Quote:
Originally Posted by poodledoodledude
hhhmmm....i don't live in this area, and never really use this road much..but seems to me, that the widening of the road didn't do much.
don't mean to be pessimistic, but....think about it...they only widened it along a small stretch. then, it goes to 2 lanes again. but, the way they widened the road, a whole city block in some parts are used for grass, rocks, and landscaping.
in other words: they took out houses and planted trees and grass. nice look, but was it REALLY necessary? that road was busy, but two lanes seemed to be fine. it wasn't THAT busy. univ pkwy is A LOT busier than 800 north in orem.
i'd like to see the traffic studies on it. i don't know...seems like a waste of money to me. i think they should have done it ALL THE WAY to the canyon! instead, it tapers down to the canyon and no one knows the wiser. the trees in the middle of the road are nice, but i don't see the NEED for it. it was a busy road, but did it warrant 63 million dollars to plant trees and grass?
yes, 63 MILLION DOLLARS!!
i don't know...i'd rather see the money spent on more important projects at the time: like widening university parkway from provo to orem state street! talk about a BOTTLENECK!! going from provo to orem up univ. pkwy and down again is a JOKE!! ....now there's a start!
poodledoodledude
|
Poodledude, what are you thinking, LOL, "and I mean this ribbing in totally good naturedness." From Provo Canyon/Univ. Ave., all the way west to the other side of State Street and 400 West is hardly a small patch. That's a very big project to be sure.
There are any one of a dozen good reasons for this to have been widened and left turning lanes added. Just one of those reasons is that 800 North serves as the most widely used alternative approach to BYU. If you think that the Parkway is crowded now, imagine what it would be like without the 800 North access. But yes, the Univ. Parkway needs to be widened, with an attractive BRT type arrangement added as soon as possible.