Quote:
Originally Posted by Arrdeeharharharbour
Wanna buy a t-shirt?... lol. It is a catchy phrase but I don't really have a firm vision of how utilization of the cut would look or be accomplished. For instance, one vision/option in my head is to go into the railcut wall sideways (grind it out) in from the existing rail bed elevation to create more width for new rail lines separate from CN's rail bed. It'd be like having a subway tunnel with one half underground and one half sticking out of the wall.
|
LOL It would make a great T-shirt!

Seriously, you should create slogans for advertisers.
I do think there would be great challenges in trying to pull it off, though. Even once you got past the engineering issues and cost, there would be the political struggles of how it should best be used. If it were done literally, you would be faced with a number of at-grade crossings, and even grade changes gentle enough for rail (the reason for the original “cut”) could be an issue.
The original cut was done somewhat forcefully by the feds as it was determined that the need for new Ocean Terminals was far more important for the wellbeing of the nation than the protestations of some well-off locally-important residents. In 2026 this could be possible due to our struggles with the US, but I suspect that if used for transit, it would more likely be in the form of a financial assist than a political one. On the other hand, we have the Province intervening in the ferry situation, so maybe?
However “cap the cut” still has power as a slogan (at least in my mind, being conditioned to respond to catchy slogans from childhood…

)!