HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1201  
Old Posted May 23, 2007, 10:38 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvel 33 View Post
City Council to approve a stretch of Milwaukee Avenue as a Historic District: Section of Milwaukee Avenue may become landmark district
Aside from the great brick loft structures, there's some real craptacular junk on that stretch too. Is everything being landmarked?
     
     
  #1202  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 12:24 AM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,312
page 1 updates:

- added the new arquitectonica LSE rendering

- added 200 west lake and its rendering

- added the rokas tower and its rendering

- added evanston's 2nd fountain square tower proposal and its rendering (still needs an emporis entry)
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a marvelous middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; May 24, 2007 at 1:10 AM.
     
     
  #1203  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 12:26 AM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,312
also, would someone from emporis please add this 22 story proposal from JDL for franklin & illinois to the database?

__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a marvelous middle ground for many middle class families.
     
     
  #1204  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 2:56 AM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvel 33 View Post
Three updates:

Here is an article regarding the proposed tower at Lake and Wells (Includes rendering): Mixed-use tower approved for 200-218 West Lake Street

]
Mandarin's little brother and cousin of the Fairbanks.

Last edited by bnk; May 24, 2007 at 3:06 AM.
     
     
  #1205  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 3:08 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
200-218 West Lake Street

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvel 33 View Post


Here is an article regarding the proposed tower at Lake and Wells (Includes rendering): Mixed-use tower approved for 200-218 West Lake Street
Thanks Marvel 33!




^ Here's how the site looks today.
     
     
  #1206  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 3:27 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
May 23, 2007

Parkview West


     
     
  #1207  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 3:39 AM
BorisMolotov's Avatar
BorisMolotov BorisMolotov is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 548


Another one bites the dust!

Now this is in the loop, correct? How many more surface parking lots are there strictly WITHIN the loop? I can't imagine many more, am I correct in this assumption. Wouldn't that be great if there wasn't a single parking lot dowtown?
     
     
  #1208  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 3:48 AM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,393
Quote:
How many more surface parking lots are there strictly WITHIN the loop?
Northwest corner Van Buren/Wabash. Unless you also count the Northern Trust's accessory parking at Monroe/Wells.
     
     
  #1209  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 3:56 AM
Rocket1 Rocket1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 470
Quote:
Originally Posted by BorisMolotov View Post

Now this is in the loop, correct?
Is it?

My impression was that the site is just north of the Loop (on the NW corner of Wells and Lake)
     
     
  #1210  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 4:08 AM
TowerGuy37 TowerGuy37 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 176
bizarre development question>?

Can Anybody Please Tell Me What The Significance Of The '"elgin Street Sweepers" Provide ?must Be 1 Anoying Vehicles On Every Sreet Downtown Where Any Development Is Going On. Im Assuming They Are Suppose To Be Keeping The Dust From The Sites To A Minimum, But Everytime I Pass One They Are Stirring Up The Dust And Holding Up All The Traffic Behind Them! Totally Annoying And Im Sure One Of Those Weird Idiotic Ordinances The City Requires All Developers.
     
     
  #1211  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 4:21 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
Does anyone know what is planned for the area east of 188 West Randolph? Is this part of the residential conversion?

May 23, 2007

     
     
  #1212  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 5:10 AM
Tom Servo's Avatar
Tom Servo Tom Servo is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by BorisMolotov View Post


Another one bites the dust!

Now this is in the loop, correct? How many more surface parking lots are there strictly WITHIN the loop? I can't imagine many more, am I correct in this assumption. Wouldn't that be great if there wasn't a single parking lot dowtown?
i think that'd be awesome. and btw, there are a lot of parking lots in the loop. EDIT* i need to READ better. SURFACE lots, oops. well there are those down next to the CNA and the Library and that BIG open lot of grass... anyway...
     
     
  #1213  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 6:05 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
May 23, 2007

MoMo
     
     
  #1214  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 12:20 PM
itsnotrequired itsnotrequired is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket1 View Post
Is it?

My impression was that the site is just north of the Loop (on the NW corner of Wells and Lake)
Correct so it is technically not within the loop of the Wells-Van Buren-Wabash-Lake L tracks.
     
     
  #1215  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 1:06 PM
museumparktom museumparktom is offline
Chicagotom SSC
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsnotrequired View Post
Correct so it is technically not within the loop of the Wells-Van Buren-Wabash-Lake L tracks.
Technically, the 200 - 218 lot is outside the Loop, it's not inside the elevated tracks it on the border of the loop. I'm out of town today or I would walk it and look at lunch. I don't think there are any purely surface lots within the Loop. There are still quite a few with in the Wacker, Congress Michigan boundaries though. In fact most of them are on Wabash and Wells
     
     
  #1216  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 1:06 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
^ It's also actually not a surface lot - it's a small, ugly garage which is just as bad...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #1217  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 1:08 PM
museumparktom museumparktom is offline
Chicagotom SSC
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 438
Right there are a few of these god awful 2 and 3 level dumps
     
     
  #1218  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 1:09 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by bnk View Post
Mandarin's little brother and cousin of the Fairbanks.

I like it - kind of what I thought it would be: nothing spectacular but quite serviceable for its site...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #1219  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 3:06 PM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
^ Yep.

I know we've touched on this before, but I've got to bring it up again: SCB is starting to really get on my nerves. Who's responsible for all of these designs looking so damn similar? Is Wolf so convinced that he's a superstar, and that he has exactly the right solution, that he wants to pollute the whole city with the same kind of design? Is Buenz preventing others from becoming designers? Or, is it simply that the developers are saying "you have three weeks to give us a preliminary design," and SCB takes the bait?

I know for a fact that they have the talent and the strength to produce something a wee bit different. Even somone like Al Shaw would at least change the colors and materials when he "rehashed" designs.

The catch here, of course, is that the design quality is usually a lot better than standard fare in Chicago. Hence, little complaining about this issue from any of the critics or public. But really, Mies could get away with this because he was the genius. SCB? Not so much.
     
     
  #1220  
Old Posted May 24, 2007, 5:25 PM
tm30's Avatar
tm30 tm30 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 93
* Moderator Edit *

all trump tower chicago discussion should go in the trump tower chicago thread

- steely

Last edited by Steely Dan; May 24, 2007 at 5:40 PM.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:06 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.