Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu
I went walking last night and there were people two blocks east of Metroplace handing out flyers to save the old buildings along Beresford Street from more high-rises. Needless to say that I didn't take a flyer and instead continued walking happy knowing that more high-rises are on the way also east of Metrotown station! Can't wait to start seeing more density on that side as well.
I do understand why those residents might be angry, but they have been living a prerogative life for decades, living next to a major Skytrain station and paying way under market price rents. I am sorry, but such entitlement is just not possible anymore at such location.
|
I am disappointed that low-income residents of the area will be displaced. There should be more affordable housing solutions for these residents if they are displaced by development, close to where they have established their roots. In our society we treat people from the margins of society like dirt, which is not acceptable. Sucks that the federal government cancelled their housing program in the early 1990s and, to my knowledge, the provincial government never has had one. What this means is that there is a significant failure regarding policy at the provincial and federal levele. As we all know market mechanisms would be unable to fill this void given the need to make a profit when developing a site.
The developers are doing what is in their right to do, which is to purchase land that needs to be developed and shows massive money-making potential. The possibility of future densification in the Metro area is absolutely massive and unprecedented. The number of high-rises that could be built along Kinsgway is enormous and the number of mid-rises south of Central Boulevard that could be built is also very significant. It needs to happen.
The walk-ups currently in the area look decrepit and are past their best before date. If properly maintained I believe these buildings could last for upwards of 100 years, but I doubt landlords would be willing to allocate that much money for repairs as a building gets older, and have not yet maintained a proper maintenance schedule, hence why they are so willing to sell their plot of land to developers. The finances do not work for the continued maintenance of these buildings.
Places change and do need to change. To keep a place ossified in time, such as Grandview-Woodlands area, is not acceptable or desirable. To me, it indicates death and the romanticization of one specific historical understanding of a region. Seeing all the buildings being constructed in Brentwood and Metro indicates vitality and expectancy, a city constantly reborn into something new and different. It is through this process of rebirth that a city is allowed to thrive and prosper. There is always Detroit for people who want to see the end of development.