HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 28, 2019, 3:49 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonoboZill4 View Post
The backside looks to be entirely blank elevator core... this one will be ugly as sin

The back (western) side of this tower won't be what you think it will, though a portion of it will be for the core. The view of it will be mostly blocked by the taller Tower Fifth, so we are at least lucky the best side of the tower will face the east.



__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2019, 10:43 PM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
That’s a Foster trademark. The elevator banks are back there. If this were proposed for Chicago, there’d be a front-page story in the Trib. As with 2 WTC, every US city would love to have this.
Chicagoans would hate it. It would be front page, sure, but it wouldn't be something they'd want. It'd be there out of disgust lol
__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2019, 10:59 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonoboZill4 View Post
Chicagoans would hate it. It would be front page, sure, but it wouldn't be something they'd want. It'd be there out of disgust lol
Disingenuous per se.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2019, 1:39 AM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
Disingenuous per se.
You must be quite unfamiliar with Blair Kamin and his social sway in Chicago then.
__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2019, 9:02 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 12,690
A little similar?
__________________
Everything new is old again

Sic semper tyrannis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2019, 2:38 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,284
I see what he's saying. Somewhat shares similar design styles. Kinda"ish".

Even if subject to change (if that even occurs), I'd be curious to see an up close rendering of that crown (Penn East).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2019, 4:21 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,199
Yes, they are similar in form, but design-wise, also very different.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2019, 3:44 PM
Zerton's Avatar
Zerton Zerton is offline
Ω
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,595
I don't mind architects recycling basic design ideas if they're good ideas. Reminds me of the Solow Building and the Grace Building, both in NYC by the architect Gordon Bunshaft. He was all about that tapering massing.

I think it's kind of neat having two similar buildings in the same city. Sort of like the twin-spire/antenna trend in Chicago.

Now if the new Chase Building is also a wedge design, that will be a little crazy.
__________________
If all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed, if all records told the same tale, then the lie passed into history and became truth. -Orwell
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2019, 4:12 PM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,161
fortunately, from the massings, we already know 270 Park will differ.
__________________
click here too see hunser's list of the many supertall skyscrapers of New York City!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2019, 10:27 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,199
I don't think the shape here dictates that they are the same, just as I don't think two bix designs are the same because they are boxes. I think what most caught me off guard is the fact that you don't have it in New York. So naturally it's what you think of.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2019, 11:24 PM
BXFrank BXFrank is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 168
I’m lost with all these new proposals, can someone make a rendering of all these 1,400+ footers going up?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2019, 4:40 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by BXFrank View Post
I’m lost with all these new proposals, can someone make a rendering of all these 1,400+ footers going up?
Credit goes to Thomas Koloski

Click spoiler to see rendering or projection of the super tall capital being born.


Last edited by chris08876; Oct 16, 2019 at 12:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2019, 11:48 AM
BXFrank BXFrank is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
Credit goes to Thomas Koloski

Click spoiler to see rendering or projection of the super tall capital being born.

Thanks that’s amazing, is only a matter of time for a megatall to emerge
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2019, 12:23 PM
pianowizard pianowizard is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SE Michigan, US
Posts: 1,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by BXFrank View Post
only a matter of time for a megatall to emerge
Agreed. The reason why many of us are "lost with all these new proposals" is that they are all roughly in the same height range, so none of them really stands out. Eventually someone will want to stand out, and the best way to do that is to have a roof height of at least ~1700 ft. Of course 1700 ft is still not megatall, but it's easy enough to add a spire to reach 1968.5 ft (600 m).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2019, 6:35 PM
Skyy's Avatar
Skyy Skyy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by pianowizard View Post
Agreed. The reason why many of us are "lost with all these new proposals" is that they are all roughly in the same height range, so none of them really stands out. Eventually someone will want to stand out, and the best way to do that is to have a roof height of at least ~1700 ft. Of course 1700 ft is still not megatall, but it's easy enough to add a spire to reach 1968.5 ft (600 m).
Yes, while it is amazing New York is getting a new ~1400ft plateau, it would be nice to have a focal point amongst it all
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2019, 4:43 PM
patriotizzy's Avatar
patriotizzy patriotizzy is offline
Metal Up Your !
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 1,624
Lol a "spoiler." Good grief.
__________________
Making America Great Again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2019, 6:20 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,199
From that angle, 15 Penn doesn't look bad.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2020, 11:33 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,284
Vornado’s Supertall 350 Park Avenue Gets Tentative 2027 Opening Date



Quote:
Plans for 350 Park Avenue were revealed last year but we won’t see the supertall complete until 2027 at the earliest. In a 2019 fourth quarter earnings call last week for Vornado Realty Trust, the company confirmed that ongoing leases would conclude by end of 2023, which is the earliest it could begin to take down the current building and build the almost 1,500-foot-tall office skyscraper.

In order to build the supertall, construction would require the demolition of Vornado’s existing building on Park Avenue as well as the neighboring 23-story tower owned by Rudin Management. The site for 350 Park Avenue sits between 51st and 52nd Streets, near the 6 train at 51st Street subway station and the E and M trains at Lexington Avenue-53 Street station.

Given the location and market conditions, Vornado foresees 350 Park Avenue commanding top rents for the proposed Class A office building. However, the scale of the development will depend on the timing and joint venture agreements with Rudin.

“We can build on our own. We don’t need Rudin to build there,” said Michael J. Franco, president of Vornado during the earnings call. “We can build a 1-million-square-foot boutique building on that site on our own, or we can combine with Rudin who is behind this and build close to a 2-million-square-foot building.”

No announcements were made in regard to the architect or the design previously revealed in a brochure created by both Vornado and Rudin.
====================
NYY
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2019, 8:12 PM
BXFrank BXFrank is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 168
It’s hard to believe prior to 2012 the tallest building in NYC was the Empire State Building. It stood out in every skyline pic. 6 years later is soon to be the 6th tallest. While I do miss NYC iconic signature skyline of the ESB, Twins/WTC, Brooklyn bridge and Lady liberty, we’re now in an exiting time where our skyline will probably never be complete, just surprising us as it evolves.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2019, 11:23 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,284
^^^^

All built on demand too. Where other places build on massive speculation and ego, we build on demand. This city is making records, and its all demand based!

Makes it even more impressive as we aim for the top crown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:12 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.