HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2017, 8:18 PM
excel excel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,484
Looking good.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2017, 9:56 PM
rofina rofina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,149
Wow.

That's impressive.

Those are going to be some lasting views from the top floors. Phenomenal too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2017, 12:10 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,614
Hopefully the mullions will show up more than in that new rendering.

Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Couple of other pics from Hive:


Artistic rendering of the two towers proposed for 660 Quayside Drive in New Westminster. (Amanat Architect / Bosa Development)
http://dailyhive.com/vancouver/660-quayside-drive-new-westminster-bosa
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2017, 4:06 AM
Nites Nites is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,558
Those look fantastic! The render makes them look taller then what they are listed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2017, 5:22 AM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickvug View Post
New render posted at http://www.pierwestbybosa.com. I noticed ads in the local paper as well.

"THE FLAGSHIP OF A VIBRANT WATERFRONT COMMUNITY, COMING EARLY 2018".

Looking decent I suppose, who else sees the spandrel crowns?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2017, 5:43 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,401
Yeah, the crown spandrel looks horrible. I hope they will change it, as it is such a low-cost thing ruining the appearance of these landmark towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2017, 8:07 AM
Nites Nites is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Yeah, the crown spandrel looks horrible. I hope they will change it, as it is such a low-cost thing ruining the appearance of these landmark towers.
They completely throw the flow of the building off. Other then that I love the renders. I wonder how far down they could even excavate being so close to the shoreline. They could potentially hit wet soil at 30-40 feet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2017, 2:22 AM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
David
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Posts: 1,453
Wow, what a stunning project for New West. I am getting major Portland waterfront vibes from the ground level of those renderings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2017, 5:45 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,946
I am pretty much saying the same thing as everyone else here.

Spandral at the top is unfortunate but overall great looking towers.

I still find it bizarre (in a good way) that towers of such scale will be built in New West.

Also it is interesting that despite rivers running through our entire region New West is the only location with an urban river front.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2017, 11:39 AM
Nites Nites is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
I am pretty much saying the same thing as everyone else here.

Spandral at the top is unfortunate but overall great looking towers.

I still find it bizarre (in a good way) that towers of such scale will be built in New West.

Also it is interesting that despite rivers running through our entire region New West is the only location with an urban river front.
Does Steveston count?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2017, 11:51 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,946
Secret shame of mine... I have never actually been to Steveston.

I feel that is in between a true urban riverfront and just a few wharves loosely strung together. With this development New West will definitely achieve a true urban riverfront
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2017, 4:26 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Steveston barely counts as riverfront (basically ocean) and definitely isn't urban. Although I like the vibe there more than New West - best part of Richmond IMO. You should visit, Metro.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2017, 9:07 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,714
Quote:
Originally Posted by skymaster View Post
They completely throw the flow of the building off. Other then that I love the renders. I wonder how far down they could even excavate being so close to the shoreline. They could potentially hit wet soil at 30-40 feet.
They're planning on building a "bathtub" that extends below the waterline. It's going to be a pretty exciting project to see them build.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2017, 10:03 PM
LowerLonsdaleMike LowerLonsdaleMike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 182
Love it! This is going to up the ante for New West. I wish North Van would be this bold with tower heights. These would look amazing in Lower Lonsdale.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2017, 3:10 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by LowerLonsdaleMike View Post
Love it! This is going to up the ante for New West. I wish North Van would be this bold with tower heights. These would look amazing in Lower Lonsdale.
I remember around 10 years ago when I first joined this forum there was a beautiful landmark tower proposed for North Van. Was it called site 8 or something like that? The design was based on the hull of a ship and I believe it would have been around 130 meters? Sadly the opposition was massive and it was cancelled. It has always been beyond me how people can be so bothered by a tower in an urban area...
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 12:53 AM
Cypherus's Avatar
Cypherus Cypherus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
I remember around 10 years ago when I first joined this forum there was a beautiful landmark tower proposed for North Van. Was it called site 8 or something like that? The design was based on the hull of a ship and I believe it would have been around 130 meters? Sadly the opposition was massive and it was cancelled. It has always been beyond me how people can be so bothered by a tower in an urban area...
Probably people were worried that proposal would open the flood gates for more towers in North Van and take away from its otherwise small town feel of the area. Admittedly, we saw that happen with Metrotown and Brentwood once the initial proposals for towers became approved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 1:35 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
if only .....

It's a shame that those buildings have spendrelly crowns that are chonky and nor tightly or elegantly designed, still in harmony with the buildings.
If such were the case, and if that "suburban" feel induced by all the spandrel was largely reduced and/or replaced, these buildings would IMO be fine along Robson or even Georgia, perhaps.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 3:29 AM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
I still find it bizarre (in a good way) that towers of such scale will be built in New West.
Hardly find this bizarre. Metro Van is becoming a very poly-centric region. New West is the most central of these nodes and already quite urban, especially with the bridges. Combined with Surrey City Centre, this area will become an eastern counterpoint to downtown Vancouver.

Towers should fit into the skyline nicely from this view point. The combined New West / Burnaby skyline seen from here will probably look larger than downtown Vancouver eventually (of course it's an illusion, and not comparable at all at ground level, but still looks impressive from a distance).

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 4:15 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,401
Nice panorama, Shift.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 8:21 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shift View Post
Hardly find this bizarre. Metro Van is becoming a very poly-centric region. New West is the most central of these nodes and already quite urban, especially with the bridges. Combined with Surrey City Centre, this area will become an eastern counterpoint to downtown Vancouver.

Towers should fit into the skyline nicely from this view point. The combined New West / Burnaby skyline seen from here will probably look larger than downtown Vancouver eventually (of course it's an illusion, and not comparable at all at ground level, but still looks impressive from a distance).

Great photo of tall buildings all over Burnaby and New West!

This phenomenon is only happening because of the tight restrictions when it comes to building tall towers in Vancouver. If developers had a choice, they would put many of the current towers they are building in the suburbs along West Broadway and Cambie corridor, in Kitsilano, Olympic Village, Commercial/Broadway, Strathcona, Chinatown, etc. Alas, Vancouver's policies and Vancouverites drive them away to greener pastures. Well, Vancouver's loss is the suburb's gain.

However, if the policies in Vancouver do change, I'm afraid the suburbs will not see such growths, unless they make use of the current lull and create/establish their own independent urban centres, complete with good retail, housing, offices and other commercial/social facilities and amenities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:08 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.