HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Arts, Culture, Dining, Recreation & Entertainment


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2009, 3:20 AM
Okstate's Avatar
Okstate Okstate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE PDX
Posts: 1,367
Who has a larger soccer interest: Nike or Adidas?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2009, 5:08 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,532
MLS, Adidas
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2009, 4:03 PM
twofiftyfive twofiftyfive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDaMan View Post
MLS, Adidas
Yeah, adidas has been the exclusive uniform supplier for MLS for a few years. Also, apparently Nike won't buy stadium naming rights or jersey sponsorships (though they make them, of course). I don't know about adidas.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2009, 5:53 PM
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,116
Adidas is currently the world leader for equipping soccer teams, etc. and, locally, is a sponsor of the Timbers. I wouldn't be surprised is Mark is right on the name change.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2009, 8:08 PM
65MAX's Avatar
65MAX 65MAX is offline
Karma Police
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: People's Republic of Portland
Posts: 2,138
I like the sound of Adidas Field, or Park, or Stadium.... whatever. But I'd be surprised if they DO buy the naming rights. Adidas sponsors many teams, and putting their name on Portland's stadium would make them seem partial to Portland's team. Especially if both teams playing against each other are sponsored by Adidas. It's probably why Nike won't put their name on a sports arena, they have to stay impartial when so many teams are wearing their products.

That said, I'd love to have the MLS Timbers playing in Adidas Stadium and the MLB Portland A's playing in Nike Field.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2009, 10:28 PM
JordanL JordanL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by 65MAX View Post
I like the sound of Adidas Field, or Park, or Stadium.... whatever. But I'd be surprised if they DO buy the naming rights. Adidas sponsors many teams, and putting their name on Portland's stadium would make them seem partial to Portland's team. Especially if both teams playing against each other are sponsored by Adidas. It's probably why Nike won't put their name on a sports arena, they have to stay impartial when so many teams are wearing their products.

That said, I'd love to have the MLS Timbers playing in Adidas Stadium and the MLB Portland A's playing in Nike Field.
Yeah, unlike more naming deals, that would reflect a lot on the city and state. Portland is the North American headquarters for Adidas and the Corporate headquarters for Nike. (The only Fortune 500 company located in Portland BTW... which is sad...)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2009, 11:43 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,532
^Is Precision Castparts no longer a Fortune 500?
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2009, 12:46 AM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,480
oooh!

Precision Castparts Park


its got a nice ring to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2009, 2:26 AM
65MAX's Avatar
65MAX 65MAX is offline
Karma Police
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: People's Republic of Portland
Posts: 2,138
PC Park
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2009, 6:18 AM
RoseCtyRoks's Avatar
RoseCtyRoks RoseCtyRoks is offline
shozbot!
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: City Of Roses
Posts: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDaMan View Post
^Is Precision Castparts no longer a Fortune 500?
In 2008, P.C. was ranked 444, and Nike was 153..... Hey,we're getting there!

http://www.bizjournals.com/portland/...l?ana=from_rss
__________________
One can never know for sure what a deserted area looks like.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2009, 7:30 AM
Okstate's Avatar
Okstate Okstate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE PDX
Posts: 1,367
I guess we can change the thread title to MLS in Portland(!)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2009, 7:49 AM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,599
Soccer decisions coming up fast
City council must approve stadium development agreements by April 15

By Jim Redden

The Portland Tribune, Mar 26, 2009

The City Council must sign its first agreement on the Major League Soccer deal in less than three weeks, according to new franchise owner Merritt Paulson.

The council must by April 15 approve the pre-development agreement to renovate PGE Park for the incoming MLS team and build a new Triple-A baseball stadium in the Rose Quarter, Paulson said.

After that, Paulson said, the council must approve the designs for the facilities and sign leases and operating agreements for them with his company by Aug. 1.

At that time, the council must also agree on all public sources of funding for the projects, including $15 million for the PGE Park renovations and $18.5 million for the new ballpark.

The City Council agreed to support Paulson’s bid for an MLS team on March 11 by approving the broad outlines of an estimated $129 million plan to renovated PGE Park for professional soccer and build a new Triple-A baseball stadium in the Rose Quarter. The deal calls for the city to commit about $70 million to the project, provided that no existing or future agency budgets be cut.

As part of the deal, Paulson agreed to spend $35 million of his own money to buy an MLS expansion franchise and raise most of the rest of the money from private sources. He owns the minor league Portland Timber soccer team and the Triple-A Portland Beavers baseball team, which plays in PGE Park and would need a new home.

The March 11 resolution said the financing plan must be finalized by Sept. 1. But the actual date is Aug. 1 because of the legally required 30-day review for any plan involving the sale of public bonds.

“It’s an aggressive schedule but I’m confident the City Council can do it,” said Paulson, who celebrated the franchise award March 20 at a raucous downtown press conference.

City Commissioner Randy Leonard, the most outspoken supporter on the City Council of bringing major league soccer to Portland, agrees the schedule is tight but is confident the deadlines will be met.

“We’re going to do it,” said Leonard.
Needing a big idea

The deadlines, however, would seem to preclude some of the public discussions promised by the council on potential funding sources. The original resolution called for raising $15 million to help pay for the PGE Park renovations from a yet-to-be-created urban renewal area. But Commissioner Dan Saltzman deleted that provision after Multnomah County Commission Chairman Ted Wheeler and Portland school board member Trudy Sargent complained that the county and school district had not been involved in the discussions over it. City urban renewal areas temporarily divert property tax increases for the county, school districts and the Port of Portland.

The council approved Saltzman’s motion and passed the resolution on a 3-2 vote, with Mayor Sam Adams, Leonard and Saltzman voting yes. Each subsequently said that creating a new urban renewal area was still an option, provided the other governments supported to it. But even though Adams and Wheeler have agreed to begin such discussions, they are likely to take longer than the Aug. 1 deadline to pull together all funding sources.

Leonard understands that problem and is confident other funding can be found. According to Leonard, options include economic development funds administered by the Portland Development Commission, raising the current 6 percent ticket charge on events held at city-owned sports facilities and imposing a tax on alcoholic drinks sold in them.

“No decision has yet been made,” said Leonard. “These are just ideas at this point. But we do have options.”

The deadlines might also seem to preclude lengthy discussions with Rose Quarter area property owners on the best location for the new Triple-A baseball stadium. Although Adams said the stadium could be located anywhere within the Rose Quarter, Paulson believes the site of the aging Memorial Coliseum, just southwest of the Rose Garden, is best. In fact, he believes demolition needs to start on the coliseum by January 2010 for the stadium to be completed by 2011, when PGE Park is scheduled to be reconfigured solely for Major League Soccer.

That would not seem to leave time for the city to negotiate a master redevelopment plan for the Rose Quarter with the Portland Trail Blazers and other area property owners. The Blazers have worked on their own Rose Quarter redevelopment plan that considers preserving the shell of the Memorial Coliseum for an entertainment zone, including space for free concerts.

“It seems like there hasn’t been a huge commitment on the part of the city to involve the public in the siting decisions yet,” said Damien Hall, an attorney who serves as vice chairman of the citizen advisory committee for the Oregon Convention Center Urban Renewal Area, which includes the Rose Quarter. “We hope they move fast to put some kind of process or task force together.”

Paulson is convinced, however, that a baseball stadium would fulfill the Blazers’ dream of energizing the Rose Quarter. In addition to Beavers’ games, Paulson said, the stadium could host outdoor concerts in the summer and other sporting events, including high school and college baseball tournaments.

“The Rose Quarter needs a big idea to turn it around and that’s what the ballpark is – a catalyst to make things happen,” he said.

At the same time, Paulson said, he is thinking about contingency plans in case some of the work is not completed on time, although he declined to detail them.

jimredden@portlandtribune.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2009, 2:28 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,532
Friday, March 27, 2009
MLS: No done deal
Complicated financing plan will face intense scrutiny from investors
Portland Business Journal - by Erik Siemers Business Journal staff writer


City officials remain pessimistic about finding buyers for $36 million in bonds critical to the effort to bring Major League Soccer to town.

Failure to find a buyer could doom the proposal to renovate PGE Park for the Major League Soccer franchise granted last week to Merritt Paulson, who owns the Portland Timbers, Portland’s minor league soccer team.

The problem? The financing proposal calls for selling a complicated zero-coupon bond to a weak market in which buyers want simple and safe investments.

“I’ve been doing this since ’82 and I’ve never seen a market where we don’t know if there will be buyers,” said Eric Johansen, the city’s debt manager.

Paulson, however, remains confident, saying the biggest hurdle — securing the franchise — has been leapt.

“As it is now, it’s not a concern for me,” he said from his PGE Park office. “We faced a bigger challenge in getting to where we are now.”

The city’s $124 million plan to attract Major League Soccer includes roughly $33.7 million to upgrade PGE Park and make it a soccer-specific stadium.

Another $55.1 million would be spent to build a new ballpark for the Portland Beavers, the city’s minor league baseball team, which Paulson also owns.

The Beavers currently play at PGE Park. The new ballpark, as planned now, would be next to the Rose Garden.

Both stadiums would open in April 2011.

Paulson would personally pay the $35 million franchise fee for the new soccer team along with $12.5 million of stadium construction costs.

Those certainties aside, the bond financing for the deal is tricky.

The city wants to pay about $50.1 million of the cost of the stadiums with taxable bonds from two different revenue sources — $18.5 million backed by an urban renewal district around the Oregon Convention Center and $31.6 million from a city fund generated by ticket taxes and other fees paid at PGE Park, the Rose Garden and other facilities.

Paulson and his City Hall backers can sell $13.6 million in bonds backed by ticket taxes using a commonly used debt structure that should have no difficulty finding buyers, said Ken Rust, the city of Portland’s chief administrative officer.

Using ice cream flavors as an analogy, Rust called the bonds “plain vanilla.”

But that so-called “spectator” fund will have a limited revenue stream until previous debt service is retired on PGE Park and the Rose Garden, forcing the city to employ a more complicated “zero-coupon” debt structure for the remaining $18 million in ticket-tax bonds.

With zero-coupon bonds, investors won’t reap any rewards until the bonds mature in 2035 while still paying taxes each year on the increased value of the bonds.

In Rust’s analogy, such zero-coupon bonds are “pistachio” flavor.

The $18.5 million in bonds related to the Convention Center’s urban renewal area are even more complex.

Similar to the ticket-tax bonds, they’ll be taxable zero-coupon bonds.

But complicating things further, the bonds will have what’s referred to as a “junior lien,” meaning previous debt service will have first priority on incoming revenue, increasing the possibility of receiving a lower credit rating.

“I’m not sure what flavor it is,” Rust said.

With each new layer of complexity comes a new story to explain to investors, whittling down the potential pool of buyers, Rust said.

“The more complicated the story gets, the more buyers you start to lose,” Rust said.

Paulson admits that selling a taxable zero-coupon bond will be a challenge. That’s why he wants to make the bonds tax-exempt.

In coming months Paulson plans to employ what he calls a “unique” set of resources in the financial world, including experts in municipal finance, to explore ways to structure the bonds as tax-free and, therefore, more desirable.

“If we aren’t able to do it, I’ll be able to sleep well knowing there isn’t anything else that could have been done,” said Paulson, son of former U.S. Treasury Secretary and Goldman Sachs CEO Henry Paulson.

There is precedent for making such bonds tax-free. New York City in 2006 financed the $1.6 billion cost of building new ballparks for Major League Baseball’s Yankees and Mets with a similar strategy.

Markets might favor Paulson.

While most buyers in today’s market are so-called “retail” or individual investors unwilling to lock-up their money for long periods, some investors have expressed a willingness to hear complicated pitches, said Mike Stanton, managing director and publisher of Bond Buyer, a daily newspaper covering municipal finance.

“There are a lot of investors who prefer it this way,” Stanton said. “They feel in this current environment, they can earn a decent return.”

Moreover, the municipal bond market remains strong.

The state had record interest in bonds it sold in February. Retail investors placed orders for $130 million in bonds, even though only $103 million was available.

If that continues, the city’s pessimism may recede. The stadium bonds are likely to be issued in August.

Even if Paulson succeeds, the bonds are one of several pieces that need to fit together.

The city’s $124 million proposal also has a $15 million gap after commissioners voted to remove urban renewal money from the financing plan.

While the urban renewal district idea can be revisited, Paulson contends he has another potential source to fill the gap that wouldn’t impact taxpayers or the city’s general fund. He declined to identify the source.

Paulson also needs the state Legislature to pass a bill that would allow the state to tax player salaries and use them to help pay for the stadium.

The bill, which would yield an estimated $5 million a year, isn’t likely to be resolved until mid-summer.

If any of the pieces fall apart, and the stadiums aren’t built, Major League Soccer Commissioner Don Garber said the league could rescind the franchise.

“Without a resolution of the financial package, we wouldn’t have a stadium to play in,” Garber said.

The stakes are high, and the clock is ticking. Paulson and the city need to reach a conclusion to the financing issue by Sept. 1.

“We’re confident we can hit the deadlines,” Paulson said. “There’s a tremendous amount of urgency to make this happen.”
Financial plan

What is a bond?

Essentially a bond is a loan. In the case of municipal bonds, a government entity would receive capital upfront — a loan — and repay both the principal and interest back to the investor — or lender — over time.

What is a zero-coupon bond?

A long-term bond in which the investor receives no payments until the bond matures.

What is tax-increment financing?

A method of public financing in which a municipality can access future tax revenues to fund improvements to a district. In this case, the city will issue bonds backed by TIF funds generated from an urban renewal district around the Oregon Convention Center to fund $18.5 million of the $55.1 million Beavers stadium.
Next steps|

April 15: Deadline for the Portland City Council to act on pre-development agreement with Portland Timbers and Beavers owner Merritt Paulson. Design work on both stadiums would start after the agreement is finalized.

Aug. 1: City Council action on development agreement, including details on the lease and operations of the stadiums.

Sept. 1: Deadline for the council to act on a final financing agreement on the stadiums.

Jan. 2010: Demolition of Memorial Coliseum would begin, an estimated three-month process. Construction of the new Portland Beavers baseball park would begin once the site is prepared.

Sept. 2010: Construction at PGE Park begins.

April 2011: Both stadiums open.

esiemers@bizjournals.com | 503-219-3418

http://portland.bizjournals.com/port...30/story1.html
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2009, 5:03 PM
Okstate's Avatar
Okstate Okstate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE PDX
Posts: 1,367
Have they said if a roof will be in the renovation?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2009, 6:14 PM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Okstate View Post
Have they said if a roof will be in the renovation?
the sketch just looks like they will be adding permanent seating along the east wall, then upgrading the facilities to the building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2009, 5:21 AM
Okstate's Avatar
Okstate Okstate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE PDX
Posts: 1,367
When is construction to start?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2009, 5:36 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Okstate View Post
When is construction to start?
Depends on Beaverton now....

Last I heard, Paulson said if he cant find a new home for the Beavers in the region, then he will pass up the deal to get a MLS team....so who knows, I am sure he is using that as pressure, but does Beaverton care if Portland gets a MLS team??
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2009, 11:28 AM
ProTram ProTram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 99
I am still trying to figure out how they couldn't manage to secure a spot closer to downtown for this new stadium. There are several spots. And why didn't they choose the Memorial Coliseum spot again? Is it preserved? So is the team going to go the Angels route and call themselves 'The Portland Beavers of Beaverton'? Sounds a little

I will just keep beating the drum for them to find a spot closer to downtown, but there isn't much time left, and I am eager for that MLS title.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2009, 8:16 PM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProTram View Post
I am still trying to figure out how they couldn't manage to secure a spot closer to downtown for this new stadium. There are several spots. And why didn't they choose the Memorial Coliseum spot again? Is it preserved? So is the team going to go the Angels route and call themselves 'The Portland Beavers of Beaverton'? Sounds a little

I will just keep beating the drum for them to find a spot closer to downtown, but there isn't much time left, and I am eager for that MLS title.
Another simple answer to your question...$$$

The Memorial Coliseum is now a protected landmark....which means that if city ever wishes to tear it down, it would take a much longer process now....and it looks like the city is more interested in figuring out how to reuse it than to tear it down.

The Memorial Coliseum was a bad location because all that could of been built there was a minor league park, it could of never been upgraded to fit a MLB park. Which if the city is going to spend that kind of money for a new ballpark, then that should be apart of the agenda.

The other reason is money, the reason why the city went after Lents like it did wasnt because they had the perfect location for it there...which they did not because who builds a ballpark in a park located in the middle of an old suburban neighborhood?? The city went after Lents because of the amount of money they had in their Urban Renewal funds. They were planning on using the neighborhood's money to pay for it....same goes for the Memorial Coliseum, that location was picked because it was city owned and they could use the money as apart of a Rose Quarter redevelopment.

The best location is the PPS site, just to the north of the Memorial Coliseum but the problem with that is the city is not the primary owner and that area is not apart of any Urban Renewal districts...thus the city would have to come up with the money from its general funds...which telling police officers they will have to cut back on their services for a new ballpark might of caused an uproar.

In the end, there are great locations for a ballpark close to downtown, but there is not the money for it and you cant have one without the other....thus we look to Beaverton.

Though, Portland would still be in the running to one day get a MLB team if there is ever a chance...what would be interesting is the deal going on in Beaverton which calls for a 25 year contract with the Beavers to keep them in Beaverton. Either way, I am actually hopeful for Beaverton because the fact that the mayor is seeing this as a chance to revitalize their downtown...which I am hoping that once the stadium plans are done, that the city does a comprehensive plan to better structure Beaverton's downtown that will allow proper growth and address the current problems the area has....it would be nice to one day see a real skyline and urban area for Beaverton.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2009, 12:50 AM
Okstate's Avatar
Okstate Okstate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE PDX
Posts: 1,367

Portland is finally at the stage in its maturity where it needs to get some seriuosly well planned nodes to add to its downtown core & overall metropolitan urbanity. People make fun of Beaverton but gripe when it might get something positive heading its direction as "taking" away from Portland but never seem to stop & think perhaps Beaverton & the others are actually "adding" to Portland. People have to have options for amenities. If you are forced to go (even to paradise, be it downtown Portland) for every kind of city entertainment a person can begin to resent that place. Even New Yorkers need their Brooklyn from time to time.

Having said that...I want this ballpark overlooking downtown in South Waterfront

Last edited by Okstate; Oct 17, 2009 at 1:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Arts, Culture, Dining, Recreation & Entertainment
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:21 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.