HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2016, 5:22 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,710
Let us all remind each other of the full potential of this area:

https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?m...VM&usp=sharing

If there were another east/west connection with a real signature bridge here and meaningful connective integration with an expanded East Avenue between there and to (and with) I-35? OMG that'd be amazing. It'll never happen, though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2016, 5:31 AM
lzppjb's Avatar
lzppjb lzppjb is offline
7th Gen Central Texan
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 3,150
Love the idea of a Cummings Street bridge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2016, 6:04 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by lzppjb View Post
Love the idea of a Cummings Street bridge.
Right? That would serve so many transportation interests if tied into a broader I-35 connection framework via East Avenue. It would alleviate Cesar Chavez at Rainey. It would alleviate traffic on Riverside. It would provide more access east/west generally. It would make getting into and out of Rainey significantly easier. There are so many plusses here.

I'd totally have it be two lanes in each direction with some signature arch design with architectural flair with lighting at night and a large pedestrian component and have it directly connected thru to interstate 35 as two lanes in each direction with some ingenious intersection configuration at the interstate itself to account for the elevation of the preexisting configuration (such as a roundabout from northbound I-35 to westbound East Avenue underneath the highway).

Last edited by wwmiv; Feb 13, 2016 at 6:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2016, 6:42 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin,TX<-->Dripping Springs,TX<-->Birmingham, AL<-->Warm Springs,GA
Posts: 57,205
That would be awesome.
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2016, 7:51 AM
AustinGoesVertical AustinGoesVertical is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
Let us all remind each other of the full potential of this area:

https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?m...VM&usp=sharing

If there were another east/west connection with a real signature bridge here and meaningful connective integration with an expanded East Avenue between there and to (and with) I-35? OMG that'd be amazing. It'll never happen, though.
Wow. I'm sold. This would be incredible and for it to be a signature bridge would be an even bigger plus. This area has so much potential. I like the idea of Crystal Lagoons being there, but then again to have it be more of an extended grid would be ideal as well.

What I'd love to see is mixed used density, with as always, some height. I imagine a point tower right near the waterfront that's sort of a balancing focal point with the Austonian. Even if the rest of the towers are 20-40 stories or midrises, I'd like to see a signature tower out of this. Whatever they do, I hope it's interesting. If this land is just divided up into spec office, like 8 or so 5th and Colorado type towers (15-20 stories), I'll be really disappointed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2016, 9:40 AM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
Let us all remind each other of the full potential of this area:

https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?m...VM&usp=sharing

If there were another east/west connection with a real signature bridge here and meaningful connective integration with an expanded East Avenue between there and to (and with) I-35? OMG that'd be amazing. It'll never happen, though.
I agree with everything here - including (sadly) the part that it'll never happen. At least not any time soon. I'm sure MACC would have a field day with that, by the way, haha...boxed in by two bridges (in their eyes). Of course, one of the two, to appease them, could be designed with the Hispanic culture in mind? I think that'd be kinda cool, actually.

That said, I do love the idea of establishing a significant grid there, and if that's done further connectivity (if anything else, a wide bike/pedestrian bridge) would do wonders. I think there would need to be another vehicular bridge, though...at least one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2016, 12:58 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,733
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2016, 3:55 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinGoesVertical View Post
Wow. I'm sold. This would be incredible and for it to be a signature bridge would be an even bigger plus. This area has so much potential. I like the idea of Crystal Lagoons being there, but then again to have it be more of an extended grid would be ideal as well.

What I'd love to see is mixed used density, with as always, some height. I imagine a point tower right near the waterfront that's sort of a balancing focal point with the Austonian. Even if the rest of the towers are 20-40 stories or midrises, I'd like to see a signature tower out of this. Whatever they do, I hope it's interesting. If this land is just divided up into spec office, like 8 or so 5th and Colorado type towers (15-20 stories), I'll be really disappointed.
It'll be VMU. I doubt anything more than 15 stories. There's also that Austin has historically disliked taller structures closer to the waterfront, and although idk if this area is zoned in that way, but I doubt anything tall is gonna get build net to the water.

Personally, I actually like the height requirement stepping back away from the river where they already exist and, if they don't already apply here they should.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2016, 10:24 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,710
Note: I've revamped that google map with a lot more detail. Make sure you click on the overlays, I always include descriptions of what I'd do and usually why.

https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?m...VM&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2016, 11:12 PM
hereinaustin hereinaustin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
Note: I've revamped that google map with a lot more detail. Make sure you click on the overlays, I always include descriptions of what I'd do and usually why.

https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?m...VM&usp=sharing
I've always imagined something closer to the Domain in terms of walkability and ground floor retail throughout, except with 12+ story buildings at every single block. I would also hope for a mix of residential and commercial. I'd also love for there to finally be some proper high density micro-apartments in the 300sqft range with lots of built-in storage + a murphy bed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2016, 12:16 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by hereinaustin View Post
I've always imagined something closer to the Domain in terms of walkability and ground floor retail throughout, except with 12+ story buildings at every single block. I would also hope for a mix of residential and commercial. I'd also love for there to finally be some proper high density micro-apartments in the 300sqft range with lots of built-in storage + a murphy bed.
Well, as much as a bunch of 12 story buildings would be nice, I doubt that that'll ever happen here.

I'd also fuck around with Hancock Center, use eminent domain and build the streetcar right through the middle and then use that as a neighborhood center redevelopment opportunity a la north Austin's answer to Lamar Union with a nice plaza integrated into a rail stop in the middle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2016, 3:32 PM
ivanwolf's Avatar
ivanwolf ivanwolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 469
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
Note: I've revamped that google map with a lot more detail. Make sure you click on the overlays, I always include descriptions of what I'd do and usually why.

https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?m...VM&usp=sharing
That map is restricted, my access was denied.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 6:28 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin,TX<-->Dripping Springs,TX<-->Birmingham, AL<-->Warm Springs,GA
Posts: 57,205
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/busi...emium-referral
Quote:
City vision for lakefront: More parkland, more tall buildings

By Shonda Novak - American-Statesman Staff

Posted: 10:35 a.m. Tuesday, April 5, 2016

Under one scenario of the city of Austin’s latest vision for the south side of Lady Bird Lake, a water-color image depicts a vibrant “green urban” area — but also a hefty cluster of high-rise towers that could be taller than anything currently along that side of the shore.

This morning, the Austin City Council was briefed by city planner Alan Holt, who for more than three years has been laying the groundwork for that vision — called the South Central Waterfront Initiative — to become a reality. At least one neighborhood representative is voicing concern that the plan could usher in ever-taller buildings across Lady Bird Lake from downtown.

If adopted by the City Council, the plan will set expectations on community benefits and give the city a basis for negotiating with the private land owners in any future zoning cases involving their properties, Holt said.

The city wants to work with the land owners to balance the intensity of development on their land with the city’s desire to gain significant public benefits within the district, such as affordable housing; additional open space and parkland; enhanced connections to and along the waterfront and hike-and-bike trail; and a unified street network.
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 7:50 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,710
hmm. I can't figure out why...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 7:53 PM
urbancore urbancore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Zilker
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas View Post
How do they know the neighborhood doesn't want there to be additional height? I believe that the "old" guard homeowners would most likely be opposed (probably to ANY development), but I'd wager that if you took a vote of ALL the stakeholders (renters, businesses, etc) you would have a ton of support. All the people I know that live in '04 live there because of the all the development, not in-spite of it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2016, 11:07 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin,TX<-->Dripping Springs,TX<-->Birmingham, AL<-->Warm Springs,GA
Posts: 57,205
That area now is a disgrace to the waterfront. Stubby state office buildings surrounded by acres of parking lots fronting the water is probably not what Lady Bird Johnson had in mind. And I can think we can do better than the low density businesses that are there that, despite being in a place where people should be enjoying, are not the type of business that attracts visitors there since they aren't anything special that you couldn't find anywhere else in the metro.
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2016, 11:41 AM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,733
This development would enhance everything that is great about the riverfront, the hike and bike trail, the mix-used availability that enables *more* people to enjoy what Austin has to offer. I think Dcbrickley has a point - most folks I know who still live in the Austin area love the growth. They hate the traffic, but they love what is happening in Austin. Some of the older folks are opposed to it, of course, but I can understand that - all the more reason for compromise rather than one side having all the say (i.e., no development at all vs. go crazy and never look back). It doesn't have to be black or white. I'm all for this development, personally. I think it'll be great if they do it right.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2016, 2:37 PM
futures futures is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dcbrickley View Post
How do they know the neighborhood doesn't want there to be additional height? I believe that the "old" guard homeowners would most likely be opposed (probably to ANY development), but I'd wager that if you took a vote of ALL the stakeholders (renters, businesses, etc) you would have a ton of support. All the people I know that live in '04 live there because of the all the development, not in-spite of it.
You hit the nail on the head. I moved from out of town to 78704 a few years ago specifically because of all the new development in the area (and of course the proximity to downtown and town lake).

I would wager that this development will be met with overwhelming support. The area now is an eyesore at best. Hideous government buildings, Statesman, and a failed strip club. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone looking to preserve any of that even if the new development isn't exactly their own vision.

This can't happen soon enough. It's some of the best real estate in Austin, and I'm glad people have the forethought to plan out and create visions for the area. I'd personally love to see a world class museum in the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2016, 3:22 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,710
The new park is the political cleavage issue among NIMBYs which will allow this plan to get broad public support.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2016, 4:36 PM
_Matt _Matt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 400
This would be amazing. Love the park idea.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:59 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.