HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2009, 4:20 AM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,482
Pleasantly surprising that the new Sports Corner building follows similar overall form as the old one. I guess it'll be a three story bar.



Totally seperate random question: There's a very large steel-frame project going up on Milwaukee Ave just north of Belmont. Any ideas what it is? I rode by too fast to look for any details.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2009, 1:35 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,502
Good! I liked the old Bud ad, but I absolutely hate looking at that Casino ad. Now just bring back TORCO and we're set!
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2009, 7:09 AM
Tom Servo's Avatar
Tom Servo Tom Servo is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,647
fenway anyone???

oh well, wrigley couldn't stay billboardless for too much longer, right?

and yeah, last season was one of the stranger seasons at wrigley looking at HORSESHOE and not a big red BUDWEISER roof... perhaps if the new ad is bud, then things will seem more visually normal out in left center...

plus it'll give Z a new target in bp!!

Last edited by Tom Servo; Dec 13, 2009 at 5:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2009, 12:25 AM
ChicagoChicago ChicagoChicago is offline
Chicago carpetbagger
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago, Atlanta, Nashville
Posts: 662
So the owner of the house got greedy and now it's going to cost him his advertising with Horseshoe... I love it!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2009, 4:56 PM
george's Avatar
george george is offline
dream fast
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: east village, chicago
Posts: 3,291
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2009, 6:13 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by george View Post
Good, they are a model of efficancy. Keep enough TP, soap, and running water and I'm set.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2009, 5:12 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,502
Shouldn't this thread be renamed New Ownership and Refurbishment?
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2009, 8:48 PM
The Pimp's Avatar
The Pimp The Pimp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago/Hamilton Lake
Posts: 419
That would be an improvement.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2010, 5:08 PM
BWChicago's Avatar
BWChicago BWChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 486


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2010, 8:49 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,949
What's up the huge new banners all over the exterior? I hope it's temporary. They're very distracting...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2010, 12:47 PM
george's Avatar
george george is offline
dream fast
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: east village, chicago
Posts: 3,291
It's almost approved, but won't look like this.



http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune....r-wrigley.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted May 19, 2010, 3:48 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,404
Hyatt Clark/Addison proposal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Get a spine people. When this project is completed everybody here will be wondering why in the world they bitched and moaned about a handful of nondescript facades coming down. This project is an all around plus for the neighborhood. Nobody is going to miss a couple old brick walls and what they contained inside. And nobody is gonna look at the completed project and think 'gosh what a waste, I wish we could have the old corner back.'
I have little use for what is there now other other then the three story stone on Addison but for reasons that Hayward pointed out well I would just appreciate if the street wall would be broken up a bit (and not in a faux manner as is so often done) to reflect a bit of the diversity, not necessarily the style, of the buildings across on the west side of the street. Hopefully the store/restaurant fronts will be built with retractable windows to allow for open air dining like at Red Ivy given this is one of the most positive attributes of the present streetscape.

Whatever one thinks about the team or the yahoos that frequent the ballpark the fact is that I think its the second most visited destination in the city outside of downtown. It would be real nice to get this done right and have it be quality as opposed to at best adequate design. Whether one laments the fact or not this immediate area is perhaps the most routine neighborhood face that is shown to visitors so some thought about what not only neighborhood but the largest city want it to represent should be in consideration. It doesn't have to critically acclaimed or progressive design by any means but hopefully it would be thoughtfully proportioned, non-banal, and balanced.

I would also think it would be much improved when Wrigleyville Sports submits and I assume that they can buy that out to replace it with a courtyard or restaurant. All in all I think the development is a net win even if flawed especially compared to the original proposal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted May 19, 2010, 7:53 PM
Taft Taft is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 638
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomarandlee View Post
All in all I think the development is a net win even if flawed especially compared to the original proposal.
I think this is possibly the most important statements in this entire discussion.

People forget the fact that this development has changed significantly since the originally proposed design, due largely to opposition from the neighborhood. Then, when the thing is scaled back, dumbed down and PoMo'd for the NIMBYs, people complain about the "malling of Wrigleyville".

So to those hating on the current design: what do you expect when plans are being pulled in 10 different directions due to objections from people who are going to be pissed about any plan that gets proposed?
__________________
We are building a religion, we are making it bigger.
We are widening the corridor and adding more lanes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2010, 12:04 AM
Chicagoguy Chicagoguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 667
So I tried searching online for more information on these projects but I had a hard time finding anything. Is there an estimated timeline for these projects? I love the idea of a hotel right across from Wrigley and honestly that is something that has been needed for a long time. I also really love the retail portion of the project located along Clark St. I think both would really enhance the neighborhood and I personally can't see why people are so opposed to it. Yes it is change, but change isn't always a bad thing. And right now Wrigley and the surrounding area is looking very dated, and not in a good way! I also wasnt able to find the renderings for the hotel portion anywhere online? Does anyone have access to it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2010, 4:16 PM
george's Avatar
george george is offline
dream fast
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: east village, chicago
Posts: 3,291
9-30

Newly rehabbed Wrigley Rooftops facadectomy on Sheffield


Last edited by george; Oct 3, 2010 at 9:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2010, 11:32 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,949
No post on this yet?

http://www.chicagotribune.com/busine...0,509385.story

Cubs to state: Let's play bonds
By Ameet Sachdev


The owner of the Chicago Cubs will ask the state to borrow up to $300 million in a bond offering to make extensive renovations at Wrigley Field that would ensure the team can play at the historic ballpark for another 50 years.

...If the legislation is passed, Ricketts and his family have promised to invest about $200 million in redeveloping the Lakeview neighborhood outside the stadium, such as the long-talked-about "triangle building" just west of Wrigley.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2010, 5:27 AM
alex1's Avatar
alex1 alex1 is offline
~
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: www.priggish.com
Posts: 3,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
http://www.chicagotribune.com/busine...0,509385.story

Cubs to state: Let's play bonds
By Ameet Sachdev


The owner of the Chicago Cubs will ask the state to borrow up to $300 million in a bond offering to make extensive renovations at Wrigley Field that would ensure the team can play at the historic ballpark for another 50 years.

...If the legislation is passed, Ricketts and his family have promised to invest about $200 million in redeveloping the Lakeview neighborhood outside the stadium, such as the long-talked-about "triangle building" just west of Wrigley.

I hope Rickett's head falls off his shoulders. Typical GOPer. Doling out wads of cash to crazy people like Sharon Angle and then turning around, expecting a hand-out.

Horrible, horrible human-being.
__________________
n+y+c = nyc
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2010, 8:26 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,412
To be fair, he's not asking for a handout. He's asking the state to use its ability to issue bonds with low interest rates. Should the state do so, the Cubs would be on the hook for any and all payments to bondholders. Not a single tax dollar would flow to the Cubs.

As a businessman, it's his job to pursue the best means of financing an expansion. I don't know all the details of Ricketts' plan, but I do know that private capital is still pretty difficult to get ahold of for companies looking to expand, so I can theorize about the position that Ricketts is working from.

Your knee-jerk political reaction is disappointing, especially because it ignores the massive economic boost that the Cubs provide to the North Side, from the bars, restaurants, and clubs on Clark Street to the high value that many people place on living near the ballpark and the consequent housing boom in the area.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2010, 8:22 PM
NYC4Life's Avatar
NYC4Life NYC4Life is offline
The Time To Build Is Now
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 3,004
WLS-TV ABC Chicago

Ricketts wants taxpayer money for Wrigley

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?sec...rts&id=7791463

Quote:
November 16, 2010 (CHICAGO) (WLS) -- Dozens of business and labor leaders support a Wrigley Field renovation plan they say could generate millions for the local economy and create jobs.

Cubs' owner Tom Ricketts was joined by those leaders Tuesday as they showed their support for the plan. The only catch is the Cubs' owners need the state's help to do it.

"So many people come in from foreign countries, other states. The reason is to see the Cub games. The Cubs are a massive draw. If Wrigley Field ever left the businesses here, half of them would close within a month," said Grant DePorter, CEO, Harry Caray's Restaurant Group.

State legislators could be meeting about the issue in Springfield Tuesday as well and at least starting to discuss it.
"Wrigley Field is the third-largest tourist destination in the state. People are coming there all year round," said Ricketts.

Ricketts said he wants the state to sell $300 million in bonds to fund improvements at the ballpark. The money would also pay for the development of a nearby commercial building. Ricketts said he wants to pay back the bonds with money raised by part of the amusement tax paid on each ticket to a Cubs game.

Chicago Mayor Richard Daley and Illinois Governor Pat Quinn say they are skeptical of the plan.

"I don't want to burden the next mayor," Daley said. "For me to leave and tell Tom and others that I have just taken x-amount of money out of his right pocket, you know, you have to look at that and what effect it would have on the budget because every budget's in a crisis."

Governor Quinn says there is a lot on his plate, and that the priority right now is fixing the state's giant budget shortfall.

Ricketts says the renovations and new building would generate $3 billion the next 35 years and create 500 permanent jobs.

"If it supports the neighborhood and continues bringing money into our neighborhood -- I actually don't like it, but I would support it," said Elyse Koren, Wrigleyville resident.

"I don't think it needs to be done at all. I think Wrigley Field is a historic [land]mark, and unless something absolutely needs to be done, it shouldn't be touched," said Jessica Becknell, Wrigleyville resident.

"You have to look at that, I mean, what effect would it have on the budget?" Daley said.

Wrigley is the second-oldest stadium in the Major Leagues. Its age was apparent in 2004 when concrete chunks from the upper deck began to shower fans in the seats below. Steel mesh now lines the bottom of the decks.

While the owners have made improvements and added seats, Ricketts says he needs the state's help to completely renovate Wrigley.

"It takes so much resources to develop a triangle parcel and to develop the area around that and so many resources to develop and to restore and renovate and improve the park. It is almost impossible to do both," Ricketts said.

Ricketts told the Chicago Tribune that if state lawmakers reject his plan, he does not have a Plan B.


(Copyright ©2010 WLS-TV/DT. All Rights Reserved.)
__________________
"I want to wake up in the city that never sleeps"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2010, 8:33 PM
Baronvonellis Baronvonellis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 880
It sounds like he is having trouble getting financing to make the repairs on Wrigley Field and build the triangle building on their property at the same time. So if he didn't get the state bonds he could only do one or the other.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:10 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.