Quote:
Originally Posted by hruski
It seems like Biz Journals tends to get its numbers wrong about projects this early in the design process. I wouldn't be surprised if they meant to say 600ft and 850 ft instead of 60 floors and 85 floors.
|
Another sign of the demise of journalism? (And by a senior editor no doubt.. Credibility on the line here, if true)
It would need to have a much smaller footprint than the original proposal, as 85 floors/ 1.35 million is about 16,000 sq. ft. Per floor (add maybe 1500 sq. ft. For elevator/ core/ gross unusable space). The last proposals had about a 22,000 sq. ft. Footprint.