Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoNerd
Firstly, stop calling people or neighbourhoods “poor”. It is not the 1950’s anymore. I’m sure many people in that “poor neighbourhood” have income that far exceeds yours or mine.
Secondly, income does not dictate who participates in SP consultation process. Unless you’re implying that the people of Mechanicsville are both “poor” AND “lazy”.
Lastly, I too would have the same opinion if I didn’t understand the SP/CDP/Development process. It’s simply not based on fact.
|
The word has a definition: "lacking sufficient money to live at a standard considered comfortable or normal in a society." if you prefer you can switch it in your head to "low socioeconomic status" but that's kinda hard to type on a phone.
As for the rest:
The median household income in 20011 for that area was ~$54k the city median was around ~$79k (going from the stats canada data on census mapper) and that was just a decade ago, used to be lower then that.
There was a study done one on CA in Vancouver & Toronto and there findings were "We find that members of neighbourhood associations in both cities are not representative of the broader population. They are more likely to be white, older and have higher education than the average voter. In addition, while the ideology of neighbourhood association members differs little from that of the broader public, their policy priorities are different from those of the majority of voters in both cities" Study was called "The representativeness of neighbourhood associations in Toronto and Vancouver"
I clearly stated "Usually because they could not make it to meetings for a variety of reasons", and these reasons are the same as to why they also make up the most unvaccinated portion of the population.
As for secondary plan process, What exactly do you think led to a SP for Scott limiting land next to an LRT station to 3 stories? because you can't be arguing it was what planning thought the infrastructure at that location could support, which is what should determine it. As for my opinion SP rely heavily on community consultations usually with the CA, and those CA don't represent the community at large.