Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack
It annoys a lot of federalists in Quebec too, although even a lot of Quebec federalists tend to say it as well. It's so ingrained it seems.
I guess you can imagine what Franco-Ontarians think of it!
|
It's (to me, at least) surprisingly uncommon here - usually only used in reference to something that predates Confederation. For example, "In his will, Rhodes allotted scholarships to Oxford for Newfoundland, Canada, Australia, etc." I think people here are just less likely to jump into this division language-first. We're pretty comfortable with House of Assembly, etc.
You see the word "Canada" replaced by "union" or "federation" a lot here, especially in political speeches, and then mostly by Progressive Conservatives.
For example:
Quote:
Our experience in confederation with Canada has included some challenges: the stigma of being the poorest province in the union, the bitterness of the Upper Churchill injustice, the resentment of a decimated fishery and the anger of not having our voice heard within the federation. However, today represents a significant shift in our relationship with the federal government. We are now a full partner in the federation of Canada.
- Then Premier Kathy Dunderdale, Dec. 17, 2012
|
I think the most common way people verbally separate them doesn't really imply any sense that the two are actually separated. You'll hear people say, "She's coming down from Canada", "He's working up away", etc. But if you replied, "This is Canada!" to them (as Ayreonaut does,
), they'd be absolutely bewildered that their words implied otherwise. So not really the same thing.