Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff
Not picking a fight or criticizing - just trying to understand. In the past I knew a couple transit drivers and they worked a split shift. 4 hours on - 4 hours off - 4 hours on. Wouldn't a 15 min break in the 4 hour "on" shift be accepted as ok? If the standard person works an 8 hour day they generally get two 15's and an hour unpaid lunch.
Just curious.
|
Some drivers work split shifts, others don't. Once the split is over 2 hours a small premium is paid to them. There are no "breaks". A payment of 40 hours pay is made in December in lieu of rest breaks. A driver doing a straight shift gets no actual breaks. Recovery time is scheduled into each run at its terminals, which some people think of as breaks, but it isn't. The operator still has charge of the bus. Operators will use this time to stretch, check for lost property, use a bathroom if there's one there, or eat a snack or lunch. At properties where operators do get breaks, it is at a terminal with no passengers, and usually a washroom and usually a room to sit down and eat lunch or a snack.
The purpose of recovery time is for the bus to make up any delays encountered on a trip. Sadly, many of the schedules have inadequate recovery time, on top of schedules based on running times from 2 years ago during the pandemic. Industry standard is 8 minutes per hour, WT is generally much less. Part of it is due to the shortage of operators, part of it is due to the Chief scheduler and the director wanting to do away with the "payment in lieu of rest breaks". They've been quoted as saying "if you want more recovery time, give up the rest break pay".
So, if you're wondering why so many buses are late these days, or not showing up at all, the reason is above. Without a schedule that cannot be adhered to due to poor scheduling, and without the recovery time to make up for unforeseen delays, buses run late, and when they are late enough, they are pulled from service to be put in service on time on another part of the route.