HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #11601  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2019, 5:20 AM
Wolkenkratzerliebhab Wolkenkratzerliebhab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 334
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefishingnut View Post
Agree with you about fuel for transportation. But that electric car of the future is made up of a pile of plastic (including the battery containers!), on tires of rubber, running on asphalt, lubricated by oil. Until another material comes along to replace plastic, rubber, etc., there is going to be a need for oil based industry, and I think that is going to be for quite some time.
I agree, you are most likely correct but then you can never really know, but your point is probably good enough that I would bet on it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11602  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2019, 5:24 AM
Wolkenkratzerliebhab Wolkenkratzerliebhab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 334
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark smith View Post
I dont understand why anyone would support the pipeline? Other then the few temporary jobs it will supply ,what other reason would u want it? ONlY IRVING and the other big shots will gain from this. I am puzzled. I am from ontario and nobody would want this going through their city.
Those in Sarnia, I'm sure, would disagree. The pipeline could result in a second 300,000 plus barrel oil refinery, and several plastic manufacturing plants, including various petrochemical plants resulting in billions in investment and thousands of jobs to go with them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11603  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2019, 10:57 PM
Ire Narissis Ire Narissis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark smith View Post
I dont understand why anyone would support the pipeline? Other then the few temporary jobs it will supply ,what other reason would u want it? ONlY IRVING and the other big shots will gain from this. I am puzzled. I am from ontario and nobody would want this going through their city.
People treat it as a zero-sum game where either oil is transported by pipeline or oil is not transported at all.

In reality, it's more that oil is transported either by pipeline or by rail. And one need only look at Lac-Mégantic to understand why rail is problematic. Pipelines aren't 100% safe, but they are the safer alternative to rail.

That is why I support the pipeline. I honestly don't have strong opinions about the economics of it. I do have strong opinions about oil trains rolling through town centres and across at-grade crossings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11604  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2019, 2:17 AM
mark smith mark smith is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolkenkratzerliebhab View Post
Those in Sarnia, I'm sure, would disagree. The pipeline could result in a second 300,000 plus barrel oil refinery, and several plastic manufacturing plants, including various petrochemical plants resulting in billions in investment and thousands of jobs to go with them.
Ya sure Sarnia the arm pit of Ont.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11605  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2019, 3:46 AM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 41,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark smith View Post
Ya sure Sarnia the arm pit of Ont.
I was in Sarnia last summer, and in my brief visit I rather liked the place. In particular, there is a nice park on the St. Clair riverfront underneath the Bluewater Bridge, and the subdivisions along the Lake Huron shore were quite impressive. Sure there was an industrial wasteland a little further south along the St. Clair, but this only encompassed about 2 km or so of riverfront. Beyond that, the river shoreline became very nice.
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11606  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2019, 6:22 PM
Fischbob's Avatar
Fischbob Fischbob is offline
New Brunswick Urbanite
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saint John, NB
Posts: 801
I'm somewhat familiar with Sarnia as I have extended family in that region of Ontario. It really isn't so bad - in fact I've always considered it a bit analogous to Saint John in that it has a similar population size (city proper), has a heavy industrial base and has been experiencing similarly stagnant growth patterns along with a redoubled effort to revitalize the downtown. And like SJ, certainly not deserving of its bad reputation.

As for Energy East, my position is similar to that of Ire Narissis - if they're going to transport product I'd rather see it done by pipeline rather than rail. That being said I think the project remains a political non-starter, and I don't see many permanent economic benefits stemming from its construction. The prospect of refinery upgrades/expansion is purely speculative at this point - all Alberta really wants is an international outlet for their oil. NB would simply become a 'pipe-through province' in addition to its reputation as a drive-through province!

In other news, I was at an event at The Cornerstone last night and Natasha (of Natasha's Weddings and Events) announced that they have acquired another church that they are going to renovate into a dedicated wedding venue. While she didn't specify the location, she did say it will be branded as "The Rockland", which suggests to me that the church in question may be Holy Trinity. Apparently more details and renders are to be released this coming week.
__________________
“The street is the river of life of the city, the place where we come together, the pathway to the center.” –William H. Whyte

“Forget the damned motor car and build the cities for lovers and friends.” –Lewis Mumford
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11607  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2019, 8:59 PM
thefishingnut thefishingnut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Quispamsis, NB
Posts: 286
How many Maritimers work in the oil patch? And have jobs lost or at jeopardy because Alberta can't move all the oil? I know that with my renovation business, that a lot of my clients are able to do their Saint John home renovations because they are commuting to work in Alberta making good coin rather than drawing EI in Saint John and just trying to survive. Add in Royalty contribution to the Feds which gets redistributed to have not Provinces, and I think there is a bigger picture at play than simply what direct jobs in Saint John would be permanent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11608  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2019, 4:45 AM
Franco401 Franco401 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Fredericton
Posts: 1,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefishingnut View Post
How many Maritimers work in the oil patch? And have jobs lost or at jeopardy because Alberta can't move all the oil? I know that with my renovation business, that a lot of my clients are able to do their Saint John home renovations because they are commuting to work in Alberta making good coin rather than drawing EI in Saint John and just trying to survive. Add in Royalty contribution to the Feds which gets redistributed to have not Provinces, and I think there is a bigger picture at play than simply what direct jobs in Saint John would be permanent.
This is entirely contingent on the NB economy being terrible enough to send people west forever, and according to your own logic the ones who stand to gain most from EE are (surprise surprise) Alberta. The only benefit to NB here is pretty well centred around you. In your scenario, the benefactors are people who technically live here but pay Alberta income tax.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11609  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2019, 4:43 PM
Fischbob's Avatar
Fischbob Fischbob is offline
New Brunswick Urbanite
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saint John, NB
Posts: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fischbob View Post
In other news, I was at an event at The Cornerstone last night and Natasha (of Natasha's Weddings and Events) announced that they have acquired another church that they are going to renovate into a dedicated wedding venue. While she didn't specify the location, she did say it will be branded as "The Rockland", which suggests to me that the church in question may be Holy Trinity. Apparently more details and renders are to be released this coming week.
Further to the above, Natasha's Weddings and events have confirmed that the location is indeed Holy Trinity. They have an aggressive renovation timeline, hoping to be up and running by June.

Here is an interior rendering:



The fate of the other two churches closed by the Diocese last year (St. Peter's and St. John the Baptist) remains uncertain.
__________________
“The street is the river of life of the city, the place where we come together, the pathway to the center.” –William H. Whyte

“Forget the damned motor car and build the cities for lovers and friends.” –Lewis Mumford
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11610  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2019, 9:41 PM
Fischbob's Avatar
Fischbob Fischbob is offline
New Brunswick Urbanite
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saint John, NB
Posts: 801
Interesting article interviewing a Calgary-based real estate investor on why he's acquiring property in Saint John:

Quote:
Developer Sees Port City’s Potential, Buys Union Street Apartment Complex
Jan 8, 2019 by Cherise Letson

SAINT JOHN– A real estate investor from Western Canada is the latest to see the potential of Saint John’s Union Street, a long-neglected uptown thoroughfare that has seen a fresh round of development and investment over the last year.

Brock Rogerson has purchased 61-63 Union Street, a recently updated apartment complex which has been renamed “Harbour View Towers.” The acquisition means he now owns 133 units in Saint John.

Like with the other properties he owns throughout the city, Rogerson will have Harbour View Towers’ day-to-day maintenance managed by one of the local property management companies he works with. Though the units themselves have been recently renovated, minor work will be done on the property.

Rogerson, a Calgarian, bought his first investment property in 2009 in Winnipeg. He discovered the possibilities of real estate through his previous career as an investment banker. Saint John came on his radar after meeting Andrew Bruce and Matt Joyce from Joyce Trailer Rentals in Vancouver.

“They convinced me to take a look at Saint John,” says Rogerson. “I came out, they showed me around and I decided that Saint John would be one of the places that I would do business.”

Rogerson bought his first building, a property on Hazen Street, in 2010. He said what made investing in the city appeal to him was the fact that it can provide a stable cash flow, unlike more volatile and hot real estate markets in bigger cities.

“People can invest in Saint John with no expectations of any positive developments and still achieve materially higher returns than the equity market, bond market, especially this point in the cycle,” says Rogerson.

“What I’m getting at is, I don’t care about Energy East, the second oil refinery, the reopening of the shipyard, the elimination of double (property) taxation, or anything else people think might happen. I know I can invest today and get better numbers in Saint John than I can in Calgary, Toronto, Vancouver or any other major markets.”

Despite the opportunity, Rogerson says many outside investors overlook Saint John due to its lack of population growth. Population growth typically signals a stabilized market, but he argues Saint John is achieving this another way: By demolishing unsafe inventory and focusing development in the city’s centre.

“What’s probably the untold story that surprises a lot of people from Alberta when I talk to them about what’s going on in Saint John … is that the city is actually achieving a stabilized market and a healthy economy without the population growth,” he says.

“They are essentially taking the old, condemned, unsafe buildings out of the supply and demolishing them. Then the redevelopment is mainly focused in the uptown… I think a lot of investors miss that when they’re going over the numbers in Saint John.”

But he says turbulent markets in other provinces are causing some investors to look a little more closely at the Port City.

“I would actually say that the strength in Toronto and Vancouver is causing a lot of people to look at New Brunswick because Toronto and Vancouver are overpriced and you can’t cash-flow,” says Rogerson. “While Calgary has the opposite, where we have an increase in vacancies.”

Yet, investing in Saint John and New Brunswick does have some big deterrents. Double property taxation and lack of direct flights to places like Calgary are just some of the things that turn people off.

“Definitely not having direct flights to Calgary to Saint John makes it tough. No one wants to come out,” says Rogerson. “Then they’re afraid to invest somewhere they can’t get to easily. That’s probably the biggest obstacles.”

Then is there is the fact that for many, Saint John has an image problem.

“I don’t necessarily agree with this, but people’s perception in the media and everything comes up. All the positives stories in the media that never turned out like Energy East, the second oil refinery, reopening the shipyard, getting rid of double taxation,” says Rogerson. “The more time we spend talking about that stuff and then it doesn’t happen hurts.”

This mentality is something Rogerson wants to try to combat. He says he plans to continue to invest in real estate in the city and will encourage colleagues to do so too.

“I definitely have plans to make material investments and get people from the west to invest in the east,” he says. “I see it as a long-term play . . . I don’t sell. I just buy.”
https://huddle.today/western-developer-sees-potential-in-port-city/

While we probably shouldn't expect to see any big development projects from this particular investor (he seems to have a 'buy and hold existing assets from afar' sort of strategy), I found his rationale for expanding his portfolio here to be interesting - the prospect of a steady, adequate cash flow instead of the peaks, valleys and overvaluation of the hotter Canadian cities. Reading between the lines, I think this suggests that real estate in certain sub-markets of SJ may be somewhat undervalued.

It's definitely true that a lot of investors - particularly commercial ones but really in all categories - tend to shun places with stagnant/declining population, so it was refreshing to see the point highlighted that a more nuanced look can still reveal opportunities.

While his particular investment strategy doesn't necessarily require great economic growth to succeed, I do wonder whether bigger, riskier development projects (e.g. Fundy Quay) will ultimately be undertaken in the stable/slow-growth conditions we're experiencing.
__________________
“The street is the river of life of the city, the place where we come together, the pathway to the center.” –William H. Whyte

“Forget the damned motor car and build the cities for lovers and friends.” –Lewis Mumford
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11611  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2019, 9:52 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
“The more time we spend talking about that stuff and then it doesn’t happen hurts.”

This mentality is something Rogerson wants to try to combat. He says he plans to continue to invest in real estate in the city and will encourage colleagues to do so too
Music to my ears. Couldn't agree more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fischbob
While his particular investment strategy doesn't necessarily require great economic growth to succeed, I do wonder whether bigger, riskier development projects (e.g. Fundy Quay) will ultimately be undertaken in the stable/slow-growth conditions we're experiencing
Would you include IOLHQ as a project that's bigger and riskier? I'd argue it was undertaken during stable/slow-growth conditions. Otherwise the residential and commercial development in the Uptown has been riding on smaller and smaller projects, which is still great. Other than IOLHQ we haven't had that big sexy development but we have had a ton of other work go on which I think has an equal impact overall. It's something I wish more people understood and appreciated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11612  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2019, 10:17 PM
Fischbob's Avatar
Fischbob Fischbob is offline
New Brunswick Urbanite
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saint John, NB
Posts: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHikka View Post
Would you include IOLHQ as a project that's bigger and riskier? I'd argue it was undertaken during stable/slow-growth conditions. Otherwise the residential and commercial development in the Uptown has been riding on smaller and smaller projects, which is still great. Other than IOLHQ we haven't had that big sexy development but we have had a ton of other work go on which I think has an equal impact overall. It's something I wish more people understood and appreciated.
I view IOLHQ as a bit of an anomaly, as it's an owner-occupied commercial development initiated by an entity with deep pockets who probably didn't care much about the economic climate.

Completely agree that the smaller, more incremental projects, in spite of their size, have provided a tremendous amount of positive change overall for the Uptown. We're definitely moving in the right direction, even without seeing much of the bigger stuff.
__________________
“The street is the river of life of the city, the place where we come together, the pathway to the center.” –William H. Whyte

“Forget the damned motor car and build the cities for lovers and friends.” –Lewis Mumford
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11613  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2019, 11:49 PM
WharfRat WharfRat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fischbob View Post
Interesting article interviewing a Calgary-based real estate investor on why he's acquiring property in Saint John:
To add to interesting articles about SJ, the Huff Post had this write up back in December about the real estate market in the Port City.

https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/cole-harti...cA6GM9OywALl2tdhi_uRiSEn6h3Pex9Aqr2RD7q4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11614  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2019, 7:07 PM
ColSJ's Avatar
ColSJ ColSJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 854


Quote:
SAINT JOHN – The mixed-income apartment complex that will replace the demolished “Jelly Bean” buildings at the corner of Wellington Row and Union Street will set a new environmental and design standard for buildings in the uptown core, says the general manager of Saint John Non Profit Housing.

Singh says they have a mortgage broker looking at the financing options but things won’t be firmed up until they have detailed drawings and construction estimates for the complex, which he says could cost around $7-million to build.

The building will be a 50/50 mix of subsidized- and market-rent units with a commercial business on the ground floor. They are planning for 42 units, but “could go higher to make the numbers work” for the building.

Singh says construction could begin by early fall of this year – the spring of 2020 at the latest – and the apartments ready for occupancy by the fall of next year. He says people will be impressed by the building that Acre ultimately designs.
Curious to know as to whether or not a tower crane will be used during construction. Anyone have any ideas?

https://huddle.today/construction-could-...-complex-replacing-jelly-bean-buildings/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11615  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2019, 12:13 AM
Fischbob's Avatar
Fischbob Fischbob is offline
New Brunswick Urbanite
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saint John, NB
Posts: 801
Lots of details in the linked Huddle article. I'm glad to hear that SJNPH continues to move forward with this development. Hopefully the standard of quality they are aiming for remains high all the way to project completion.

While they are applying for federal and provincial funding to help offset the costs of this project, the GM of SHNPH asserts quite strongly in the article that they would be capable of carrying out the project even if those funding applications fall through. I wish them luck in securing the private capital they'll need in either case - IIRC, Abbey St. Andrew had some trouble finding a willing lender back when it was proposed. Here's hoping that financial institutions have a somewhat more positive outlook on residential construction in the Uptown these days and The Wellington gets its required financing in short order.
__________________
“The street is the river of life of the city, the place where we come together, the pathway to the center.” –William H. Whyte

“Forget the damned motor car and build the cities for lovers and friends.” –Lewis Mumford
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11616  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2019, 2:34 PM
NB_ExistsToo NB_ExistsToo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Fredericton
Posts: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColSJ View Post




Curious to know as to whether or not a tower crane will be used during construction. Anyone have any ideas?

https://huddle.today/construction-could-...-complex-replacing-jelly-bean-buildings/
There's more than enough room on that site for a crawler crane. There's plenty of room on the backside of the lot and Union could even go to 1-way traffic if they needed the room (Don't wanna stop people from easy access to the LC!)

So, they'll have plenty of access from 2 sides. I doubt we would see a tower crane there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11617  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 3:26 AM
mark smith mark smith is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by NB_ExistsToo View Post
There's more than enough room on that site for a crawler crane. There's plenty of room on the backside of the lot and Union could even go to 1-way traffic if they needed the room (Don't wanna stop people from easy access to the LC!)

So, they'll have plenty of access from 2 sides. I doubt we would see a tower crane there.
I doubt we will see anything built there. Saint john likes to advertise their plans for awhile and then it falls through. It is a regular thing that happens.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11618  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 1:45 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark smith View Post
I doubt we will see anything built there. Saint john likes to advertise their plans for awhile and then it falls through. It is a regular thing that happens.
Good, positive attitude.

Something will be built there if SJNPH has the financing. This is general practice. In larger cities it's not uncommon for projects to be in planning stages for years before taking even more years to build. These developments can't happen overnight. The Fieldhouse (currently being built, by the way) is a good example of this.

Also, SJ isn't some amalgam blob that represents all development projects. There are different players and partners in each, so categorizing it as Saint John advertising its plans is unfair.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11619  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2019, 8:23 PM
Ire Narissis Ire Narissis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHikka View Post
The Fieldhouse (currently being built, by the way)
And an impressive build it is; it wasn't until the steel went up that I gained a full appreciation for the scale of the building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11620  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2019, 1:55 AM
ColSJ's Avatar
ColSJ ColSJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 854
Quote:
SAINT JOHN – Saint John Energy will issue a Request for Proposal Friday inviting developers to build a $30-million wind energy project in the Spruce Lake Industrial Park on the city’s west side.
https://huddle.today/saint-john-energy-seeks-developer-to-build-30-million-wind-farm-on-west-side/
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:37 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.