Quote:
Originally Posted by haljackey
|
Victoria Bridge
The current girder bridge with the pier in the middle always collects debris during flooding and the more affordable options seem to increase the number of the piers from 1 to 2. There are two arch schemes. One is closer to the other schemes and seems to be the preferred alternative.
From the AECOM Environmental Study Report:
Concrete Girder - Requiring two piers = 9.6 million.
Steel Box Girder - Requiring two piers = 10.4 million
Concrete Box Girder - Requiring two pier = 10.6 million
Tied Arch - All loading is placed on the abutments = 13.2 million
Through Arch - The two arch foundations would be placed at the river bank = 11.3 million
From the Environmental Impact Study, it's scary how many trees will be removed to the west of the bridge. Almost all of them up to the tennis courts. Doesn't matter what option they pick. Yikes.