HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #11561  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2018, 12:51 AM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,731
Viva shows the same problems that rail transit has, the last mile problem.


I never like considering average wait times. Transit riders always remember the bad experiences when they wait the maximum time or worse when buses are not on schedule.
     
     
  #11562  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2018, 5:03 PM
Reecemartin's Avatar
Reecemartin Reecemartin is offline
YouTube Creator
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 1,776
Made this video about Viva, might be valuable for those who cannot visit the system irl:

https://youtu.be/D08auGeG6LY
     
     
  #11563  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2018, 6:16 PM
FFX-ME's Avatar
FFX-ME FFX-ME is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,053
The problem with Toronto transit is that it is all broken up into useless components. Everything needs to be consolidated and placed under one roof.
     
     
  #11564  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2018, 6:29 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Toronto suburbs are useless for transit. What use is a bus route or LRT Line when a block is 2 miles long?
     
     
  #11565  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2018, 6:41 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
Toronto suburbs are useless for transit. What use is a bus route or LRT Line when a block is 2 miles long?
Or main streets that have walls along them with everything backing away or there are massive parking lots in front. Hard for transit to be effective with that kind of suburban design.
     
     
  #11566  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2018, 7:08 PM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
Toronto suburbs are useless for transit. What use is a bus route or LRT Line when a block is 2 miles long?
There aren't any 3.2 km-long blocks in the suburbs. Arterial corridors are not even spaced 3.2 km apart, so blocks cannot be that large. The distance from Derry Rd to Lakeshore is around 15km, so you are talking about blocks that span 1/5 the length of Mississauga.

And just because there is a barrier to car travel doesn't mean there is a barrier to pedestrian travel. Suburbs in Toronto utilize TOD concepts to minimize people's distance to transit. There are many paths that allow pedestrians travel in a relative straight line to the nearest transit stop and the density is higher along arterial corridors.

Transit ridership of Brampton Transit and MiWay is similar to major cities so if these systems are useless, it's not reflected in their ridership numbers. Last year, Mississauga's system got 39 million riders (56 million boardings). You won't find many systems in Canada or the US with better ridership than that unless they serve a large population.

And of course, Toronto itself is mostly suburban as well. I wouldn't call the TTC service in Etobicoke or North York or Scarborough useless either.
     
     
  #11567  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2018, 5:54 AM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
Or main streets that have walls along them with everything backing away or there are massive parking lots in front. Hard for transit to be effective with that kind of suburban design.
This. Arterial streets in suburban Toronto look like highways. Even in areas where the grid is relatively tight, the fact that development ignores the street really damages the usefulness, and potential, of transit.
     
     
  #11568  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2018, 6:28 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,812
As Doady says though, the suburban 416 has some of the highest transit rates in North America, even despite its suburban form. Even extremely suburban places like Brampton, which arguably has the most "highway like" arterial roads in the GTA, has higher ridership than most North American cities. Canadians seem to have a preference for public transit at a rate higher than most other countries, for some reason.

Of course you have York, Halton, and Durham regions with their generally abysmal transit ridership rates, but even those systems are generally respectable for North American bus networks.

The built form is crap in a lot of the GTA, but for some reason ridership is unusually high.
     
     
  #11569  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2018, 7:18 AM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
As Doady says though, the suburban 416 has some of the highest transit rates in North America, even despite its suburban form. Even extremely suburban places like Brampton, which arguably has the most "highway like" arterial roads in the GTA, has higher ridership than most North American cities. Canadians seem to have a preference for public transit at a rate higher than most other countries, for some reason.

Of course you have York, Halton, and Durham regions with their generally abysmal transit ridership rates, but even those systems are generally respectable for North American bus networks.

The built form is crap in a lot of the GTA, but for some reason ridership is unusually high.
Oh absolutely. This is true across Canada - a lot of land use forms that would seemingly be inconducive to transit having much higher ridership than they would in the US. I have no idea why this is. But I do think that were we to concentrate more on the way the built form interacts with transit (really, with the street), ridership could be even higher.
     
     
  #11570  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2018, 8:02 AM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,166
Toronto suburbs and Canadian suburbs in general are not built 100% for the car. Even if they were 90% for the car, at least transit is not completely ignored. Not everything is black or white.

In 2017, Brampton Transit got 27 million riders, or 43 million boardings. Should they cancel the service? If Brampton Transit is useless, most other transit systems in North America need to be discontinued too.
     
     
  #11571  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2018, 9:21 AM
Aylmer's Avatar
Aylmer Aylmer is offline
Still optimistic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montreal (C-D-N) / Ottawa (Aylmer)
Posts: 5,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
Oh absolutely. This is true across Canada - a lot of land use forms that would seemingly be inconducive to transit having much higher ridership than they would in the US. I have no idea why this is.
I would turn this on its head; What's curious is not that Canadians use transit, but that Americans seem almost culturally transit-averse in the same situations.
__________________
I've always struggled with reality. And I'm pleased to say that I won.
     
     
  #11572  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2018, 3:20 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylmer View Post
I would turn this on its head; What's curious is not that Canadians use transit, but that Americans seem almost culturally transit-averse in the same situations.
"The poor use transit and I am not poor." is what the Americans think. Canadians don't think that, unless you live outside a metro area.
     
     
  #11573  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2018, 5:01 PM
ainvan ainvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto/Vancouver
Posts: 965
Compass Card wristbands could be launched before Christmas

Quote:
Wristbands that have the same functions as Compass Cards for an alternative frequent user method of accessing Metro Vancouver’s public transit system could be made publicly available soon.

During his annual address to the Greater Vancouver Board of Trade today, TransLink CEO Kevin Desmond said the Compass Wristbands could be launched in a few short weeks.

Working just like a Compass Card, the wristband alternative would provide passengers with a less-hassle, card-less method of tapping in and out of the fare gates and card readers.

“Coming soon, wearables. We’ve got this model to help us debut wearables, so that’s going to be coming soon, maybe in time for Christmas. We’ll see,” he said.

Earlier this year, TransLink also rolled out VISA, Mastercard, and mobile wallet capabilities on its Compass system. During the Compass planning phase, officials also mentioned the possibility of a Compass smartphone app in the future.

And in January, it installed special radio-frequency identification (RFID) sensors at all SkyTrain stations and SeaBus terminals to enable a special tap-free RFID Compass Card for people with disabilities who have difficulty with tapping a normal Compass Card on a fare gate card reader.

DailyHive
     
     
  #11574  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2018, 5:02 PM
ainvan ainvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto/Vancouver
Posts: 965
TransLink's Mayors' Council suspends Surrey LRT in favour of SkyTrain

Quote:
Following some extremely heated debates and discussions, TransLink’s Mayors’ Council has voted to formally suspend all planning and further expenditures on planning for the Surrey Newton-Guildford (SNG) light rail transit (LRT) project.

This follows a recommendation forwarded to the Mayors’ Council by TransLink’s staff and its board of directors in response to the new Surrey City Council’s decision to oppose the project earlier this month.

It also recognizes the City of Surrey’s request to change the technology and the timing of the Fraser Highway project from LRT to SkyTrain, but with the stipulation that the project only uses the funding envelope currently allocated for South of Fraser rapid transit projects. This funding totals $3.5 billion when both Phase Two and Phase Three plans are combined. The 10-year plan will be reworked to include a SkyTrain extension in Surrey.

This means SNG LRT is now effectively dead.

SNG LRT was expected to cost $1.65 billion, running a length of 11 kms along the Newton and Guildford corridors. About $77 million or 5% of the SNG LRT budget has already been spent on planning and pre-construction work.

Previous early estimates for the 16-km-long Fraser Highway SkyTrain extension from King George Station to Langley Centre — assuming a 2022 construction start date — peg the project at $2.9 billion, including a 25% contingency.

DailyHive
     
     
  #11575  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2018, 5:02 PM
ainvan ainvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto/Vancouver
Posts: 965
TransLink's new $400 million Green Bond to fund sustainable transit projects

Quote:
TransLink has issued its first-ever Green Bond, with a value of $400 million. This makes it the first public transit authority in Canada to conduct such a capital-raising program.

This is also TransLink’s first bond issuance since it began financing projects through bonds in 2010 and the organization’s largest bond issue yet.

In a previous interview, Rob Malli, the Chief Financial Officer of TransLink, told Daily Hive that Green Bonds could help fund electric-battery buses, new rail rapid transit lines, and perhaps even the Burnaby Mountain gondola to Simon Fraser University.

While TransLink’s conventional bond program already went towards projects that are environmentally friendly, the Green Bond program seeks investors who are dedicated to green and low-carbon projects.

A Green Bond program adds a higher level of accountability towards, and the public transit authority says the interest among investors has been “significant.”

This is further enforced by TransLink’s approval earlier this fall of pursuing a green plan to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 80% and use 100% renewable energy by 2050. Much of these targets rely on transitioning to a bus fleet comprised primarily of electric-battery vehicles.

DailyHive
     
     
  #11576  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2018, 5:17 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
"The poor use transit and I am not poor." is what the Americans think. Canadians don't think that, unless you live outside a metro area.
Well... transit usage rates might be a lot higher in Canada on average, but it's still a low percentage of the population as a whole. We're talking about stuff like a Canadian city having double or triple the transit rates of a similar US city, which could play out like 5% of people using transit compared to 10-15%. In that scenario, the vast majority of each population could very well be in agreement, with only 5-10% of people differing. Not enough to say, "one country think X, and the other thinks Y".
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
     
     
  #11577  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2018, 5:36 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,812
From my experience from taking transit in the states, he isn't wrong. Only the poorest of the poor take it there.

Canada often has higher transit rates than many parts of Europe too, not just the US. For example, calgary has a higher transit modal share than any city in France other than Paris.
     
     
  #11578  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2018, 9:55 PM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,166
Transit usage in Canada is actually 4 or 5 times more than US, same as Europe, if the numbers for UK and France are any indication. I don't see why keep lumping Canada in with the US when talking about transit.
     
     
  #11579  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2018, 1:42 AM
ainvan ainvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto/Vancouver
Posts: 965
TransLink to build 4 new bike parkades at train stations

Quote:
The number of TransLink-operated bike parkades in Metro Vancouver could nearly double with the public transit authority’s plans to build new facilities at four rail stations in the region.

A Request For Proposals (RFP) issued by TransLink seeks contractors to build secure bike parkade facilities at SkyTrain’s Burquitlam Station and Lafarge Lake-Douglas Station and the West Coast Express’ Maple Meadows Station and Port Coquitlam Station.

“Part of TransLink’s mission is to connect the region and enhance its livability by providing a sustainable transportation network. Improving cycling infrastructure supports that. Bike parkades make taking a bike to transit easy and worry-free,” said TransLink in a statement to Daily Hive.

“We believe having a safe and simple place to park a bike before connecting to transit could encourage more people to try it.”

Cyclists can currently access TransLink’s bike parkades using their registered Compass Card, with parking space available on a first-come, first-served basis. It costs only $1 per day to use the parkades, with fees capped at just $8 per month.

DailyHive




     
     
  #11580  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2018, 4:02 AM
nephersir7 nephersir7 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 162
Montreal metro elevator retrofit plan for the next 4 years:

     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:07 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.