HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1121  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2016, 10:38 PM
GreaterMontréal's Avatar
GreaterMontréal GreaterMontréal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,582
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_jeffrey View Post
Actually all rails and electricity cables are being removed. The current line is 25kV AC and the REM will use 1500V DC. So nothing is being kept from the Deux-Montagne line after conversion is complete.
only the Deux-Montagnes Line runs in the Mont-Royal tunnel. There is only one small ventilation shaft in the tunnel = no diesel locomotives. The tracks and 2400 V DC catenary were installed by September 1918. The REM can use the tunnel because the AMT owns the tracks. a very important detail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1122  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2016, 12:06 PM
p_xavier p_xavier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreaterMontréal View Post
only the Deux-Montagnes Line runs in the Mont-Royal tunnel. There is only one small ventilation shaft in the tunnel = no diesel locomotives. The tracks and 2400 V DC catenary were installed by September 1918. The REM can use the tunnel because the AMT owns the tracks. a very important detail.
No, the Mascouche trains also runs through it, with bimode locomotives.

The whole electric system was remade in the 90s to support 25kV DC, there is no 2400V DC anymore. The CDPQ Infra will need te rebuild the whole electric system.

The CDPQ Infra will buy the tunnel, and tracks (to be fully redone), from the AMT.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1123  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2016, 11:18 PM
Ontario1's Avatar
Ontario1 Ontario1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 116
ION - Region of Waterloo

__________________
ZAP
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1124  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 2:34 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 19,929
Guess we can put Hamilton's LRT as under construction...

LRT crew scanning and drilling to prepare for construction

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilt...ning-1.3718938

It's a milestone of sorts — the first time crews are drilling into the ground for Hamilton's planned light trail transit (LRT) system.

Engineers are moving along the LRT route, scanning the ground to mark the exact locations of utilities running underneath. When they want to get a better look, they're drilling bore holes, said Andrew Hope, Metrolinx's director for Hamilton LRT.

This work will help Metrolinx determine which utility lines need to be moved to build the $1 billion system, Hope said. The workers with T2 Utility Engineers started Aug. 2 and will finish this spring.

"Until you open up the road, there are always hidden surprises," he said. But "this is the best you can do without tearing up the road."

Metrolinx is paying for the work as part of the $1 billion budget, as well as any complications that arise from it, Hope said. Under the memorandum of agreement with the city, Metrolinx will also pay to relocate utility lines or pipes that the city doesn't already plan to replace. The city pays if it wants to do any upgrades.

The city website says the work will cause occasional lane closures from Kingsmount Street to Longwood Avenue between now and Oct. 11.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1125  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 3:16 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,814
Well, soil testing at least. Good to see progress despite city hall being unable to agree on anything.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1126  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 3:59 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,188
Ontario cities are pretty weak.

Last week the province/Metrolinx decided to expand the Dufferin Street bridge with work to begin immediately and last 1 year for GO RER implementation and addition track.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1127  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2016, 3:54 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,188
Looks like they are getting ready to extract the Tunnel boring machines from Yonge-Eglinton.

The tunnels have been dug, I guess.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1128  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2016, 6:04 PM
p_xavier p_xavier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
Looks like they are getting ready to extract the Tunnel boring machines from Yonge-Eglinton.

The tunnels have been dug, I guess.
I still don't get why there is still more than 5 years of construction left though. Even for the Vaughan Subway Extension, why is it taking so long? The Laval metro extension took less than half of that time to build!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1129  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2016, 6:22 PM
hipster duck's Avatar
hipster duck hipster duck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_jeffrey View Post
I still don't get why there is still more than 5 years of construction left though. Even for the Vaughan Subway Extension, why is it taking so long? The Laval metro extension took less than half of that time to build!
It's the way it's being built. The stations are only built after the tunnel is bored. Basically, they drill and pour the headwalls (essentially the structural envelope) for the station first, then they drive the TBM through it, and only after that's done do they dig out the "station box" - the pit in which they build the actual station - and start building the station.

This video explains it (starting at 2:19):

Video Link

Last edited by hipster duck; Aug 19, 2016 at 6:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1130  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2016, 6:26 PM
p_xavier p_xavier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck View Post
It's the way it's being built. The stations are built after the tunnel is bored. Basically, they only drill and pour the headwalls (essentially the structural enveleope) for the station first, then they drive the TBM through it, and only after that's done do they dig out the "station box" - the pit in which they build the actual station.

This video explains it (starting at 2:19):
They might rethink how it's done! With such costs and long delays, it's amazing no one has checked for corruption!

In Laval, they dug the stations while the tunnel was being bored so they would save time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1131  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2016, 6:39 PM
hipster duck's Avatar
hipster duck hipster duck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_jeffrey View Post
They might rethink how it's done! With such costs and long delays, it's amazing no one has checked for corruption!

In Laval, they dug the stations while the tunnel was being bored so they would save time.
Right. But the big difference between Laval and Eglinton is that Laval only had 3 stations, while the tunneled portion of Eglinton has 12.

I'm not sure if this is what they did in Laval, but when Toronto built the Spadina subway extension - where there were relatively few stations - some station boxes served as the place where they would launch and extract TBMs. The distance between the stations was large enough that you could do this efficiently. This also meant you could excavate a station box at the same time that you could tunnel with the TBM (as long as the station was fully excavated by the time the TBM reached the station, you were fine).

Obviously with 12 stations, some just several hundred meters apart, it would be incredibly inefficient to dig the boxes, extract the TBMs and then relaunch them only to repeat this a few hundred meters down the road ten more times.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1132  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2016, 6:46 PM
p_xavier p_xavier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck View Post
Right. But the big difference between Laval and Eglinton is that Laval only had 3 stations, while the tunneled portion of Eglinton has 12.

I'm not sure if this is what they did in Laval, but when Toronto built the Spadina subway extension - where there were relatively few stations - some station boxes served as the place where they would launch and extract TBMs. The distance between the stations was large enough that you could do this efficiently. This also meant you could excavate a station box at the same time that you could tunnel with the TBM (as long as the station was fully excavated by the time the TBM reached the station, you were fine).

Obviously with 12 stations, some just several hundred meters apart, it would be incredibly inefficient to dig the boxes, extract the TBMs and then relaunch them only to repeat this a few hundred meters down the road ten more times.
My comment was more that, even after the tunnels were bored (with 4 machines nonetheless), there is still more than 5 years of construction left!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1133  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2016, 6:57 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
Well, soil testing at least. Good to see progress despite city hall being unable to agree on anything.

When it comes to Hamilton things like this should be out of City Halls hands all together. I hear from my Hammer friends that nothing gets done there at a decent pace. I can't wait to see the LRT in Hamilton. Your transits name will makes sense again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1134  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2016, 7:08 PM
hipster duck's Avatar
hipster duck hipster duck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_jeffrey View Post
My comment was more that, even after the tunnels were bored (with 4 machines nonetheless), there is still more than 5 years of construction left!
I'm not a construction project manager, but I think that the Eglinton line is probably the most complex rapid transit project built in Canada in decades. It's certainly the most expensive.

Apart from building 12 underground stations, you're doing this in a rather dense urban environment, and two of those stations are underground transfer stations to existing subway lines. 5 years seems like a pretty reasonable time frame.

The last time Toronto built a subway line through a pre-war neighbourhood and with as many stations was in the early 1960s. Back then, you could do things like expropriate a house for $25,000, kick out the tenants [because people who lived in the inner city usually were renters back then] without a fuss and dig a giant trench.



For better, or for worse, we can't build things that way anymore.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1135  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2016, 12:31 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_jeffrey View Post
My comment was more that, even after the tunnels were bored (with 4 machines nonetheless), there is still more than 5 years of construction left!
Spadina has had around 5 years since tunnelling was done before it will open.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1136  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2016, 2:58 AM
miketoronto miketoronto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,978
Cities build who metro systems in the time it takes Toronto and many North American cities to open small segments of subway lines.

It should not be taking this long to build any of this.

Even other projects like rail electrification. Auckland electrified and upgraded track in a fraction of the time it is going to take Toronto to do the same on just part of the GO network.

It does take long here. Not as long as NYC, but long. And this should be addressed.
__________________
Miketoronto
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1137  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2016, 4:07 PM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 10,913
Toronto tenders transit projects like Montreal tenders it's roads.

I do think, however, that the longer time on the GO lines is due to lack of money at the moment and not the issue of the electrification itself. Of course electrification could start tomorrow if Toronto decided to put one plug nickel of it's own money into the pot.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1138  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2016, 7:40 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,814
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoDrew View Post
When it comes to Hamilton things like this should be out of City Halls hands all together. I hear from my Hammer friends that nothing gets done there at a decent pace. I can't wait to see the LRT in Hamilton. Your transits name will makes sense again.
I sometimes wonder why we still have municipal governments. So many seem woefully corrupt, incompetent, or both.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1139  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2016, 10:23 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by miketoronto View Post
Cities build who metro systems in the time it takes Toronto and many North American cities to open small segments of subway lines.

It should not be taking this long to build any of this.

Even other projects like rail electrification. Auckland electrified and upgraded track in a fraction of the time it is going to take Toronto to do the same on just part of the GO network.

It does take long here. Not as long as NYC, but long. And this should be addressed.
Typical miketoronto post in comparing some far flung smaller city to Toronto while ignoring the costs of these projects.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1140  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2016, 10:29 PM
casper casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 9,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
I sometimes wonder why we still have municipal governments. So many seem woefully corrupt, incompetent, or both.
In many ways the are being replaced by authorities and agencies that are dedicated to specific activities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:23 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.