HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #11261  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2013, 10:00 PM
xd_1771's Avatar
xd_1771 xd_1771 is offline
(daka_x)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,740
The 159s and 791s seem for be rather constantly off schedule now from what I've seen :p

The new 335 extension to Newton Exchange is pretty well used.... it might be taking some of the 96's ridership away (same with 320/321/etc)
     
     
  #11262  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2013, 11:07 PM
Zassk Zassk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac Write View Post
Now that's also been a year, how is the 555 ridership?
Sorry for the useless reply, but I just wanted to point out that you asked about the 555 as the first post of page 555 of this thread!
     
     
  #11263  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2013, 1:44 AM
xd_1771's Avatar
xd_1771 xd_1771 is offline
(daka_x)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zassk View Post
Sorry for the useless reply, but I just wanted to point out that you asked about the 555 as the first post of page 555 of this thread!


I've got some good news to report on the 96 B-Line by the way! It seems that TransLink might be keeping their eyes on our forum.... I was heading out of Guildford on the 96 today during the PM peak, and I noticed that the bus had a placard on it by the door reading "via Surrey Central" - addressing the signage issue I was speaking about earlier there's still no signage at Surrey Central pointing to the bus bays (not even simple [#96 ->] signs, sort of like the [<- #99 #9 ->] sign at Commercial-Broadway), but I think this is good enough as this will help 320 and 321 riders discover the 96 during the morning rush, and then research into it at the office or whenver is best.

The bus picked up every passenger where it stopped, and it pulled into Surrey Central with a load of about 25 (and this is opposite the peak direction). This met a line-up of about 15 Newton-bound riders.

Looking from my 96, in the other (peak) direction I spotted a Guildford-bound 96 with about every seat used (meaning that on a regular 40 ft bus, there would be several standees). I'm quite confident that in a few months we will spot some standing room only 96's

Speaking of the 96, has anyone checked out 96 loads vs. 321 and 320 during the late-night hours, where service is up to 7.5 to 15 minutes from previous 30 minute frequencies? I'd bet that with the presence of the 96, 320s and 321s leaving Central will soon be empty during late night hours.

Quote:
While whalley blvd is nice its a completely useless stop. there isnt really anything there. The stop should have been at 104 and 140th. there is much higher amount of people in that area.
I think this may have to do with the Whalley Blvd area creating more of an extension of Surrey City Centre, and being a destination for at least some more jobs than 140th Street. By the way, I would actually disagree with you in terms of there being more people at Whalley Blvd vs 140th St, esp. where future land use potential is concerned. The hydro ROW at 140th Street may be quite a limiting factor in terms of improving land use in the area. It's also technically outside the city center zone.

Still, I've noticed quite a few times that a 96 driver bound for Newton will move into the left lane east of 140th St to skip frozen right turns, and then stay in the left right through Whalley Blvd, so long as no one is getting off. All times this has happened, there has been no one to pick up at Whalley Blvd, but it's interesting to see that the 96 may do that sometimes, as it's not necessarily faster into Surrey Central on 96 from there vs. other options.
     
     
  #11264  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2013, 3:24 AM
dpogue dpogue is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 766
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
Last time I checked, the bus is about 60-80% seated during late pm-peak, and having the 4th longest lineup at the station behind the #169, #159, and #791, which are all passing up like no tomorrow...
You'd think with the 791 being the 3rd longest lineup, they wouldn't stop service at 7:20pm and force everyone to detour through Coquitlam Centre
     
     
  #11265  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2013, 7:13 PM
xd_1771's Avatar
xd_1771 xd_1771 is offline
(daka_x)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,740
^ I'm sure TransLink would have expanded the service if it had the money
     
     
  #11266  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2013, 2:14 AM
logicbomb logicbomb is offline
Joshua B.
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,197
Perhaps an example of what occurs when a 320 doesn't come and the 501 is late, but the 96 B Line 2:30pm run was absolutely packed going to Surrey Central from Guildford. Coming back, the bus was 60% full going to Guildford.

Slow improvements, but I think tweaking the frequency, routing and timing of the 320 and 501 could further increase ridership.
     
     
  #11267  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2013, 2:46 AM
xd_1771's Avatar
xd_1771 xd_1771 is offline
(daka_x)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,740
96 B-Line update: trips to Newton leave full during PM Peak. Sported today at Surrey Central at 5:30pm.

Also, signage to lead riders to 96 is in place at Central. I think TransLink is really paying attention to this forum.

Also, I spotted some 40 foot buses doing the 96 on Sunday.
     
     
  #11268  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2013, 5:25 AM
Rico Rico is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 319
2nd quarter ridership stat are out. Translink has a 3.4% decline following the recent cuts and bad press.
http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Documents/Ridership/2013-q2-ridership-APTA.pdf
     
     
  #11269  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2013, 11:54 AM
AverageJoe AverageJoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 141
     
     
  #11270  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2013, 3:18 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico View Post
2nd quarter ridership stat are out. Translink has a 3.4% decline following the recent cuts and bad press.
http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Documents/Ridership/2013-q2-ridership-APTA.pdf
Ridership down because of bad press? What bad press? Can you prove ridership is down because of it? Sorry, don't mean to come across as curt. I just don't see what you're seeing. What am I missing?
     
     
  #11271  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2013, 4:40 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Ridership down because of bad press? What bad press? Can you prove ridership is down because of it? Sorry, don't mean to come across as curt. I just don't see what you're seeing. What am I missing?
I certainly think the constant negativity probably discourages new users from trying out the system.
     
     
  #11272  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2013, 5:29 PM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,077
Ridership was down 10% in the Q1 report, so Q2 already got 7% of the loss back.

I don't know about you, but I certainly feel the buses and trains are more crowded this September compared to last one - at least in the Coquitlam area...
     
     
  #11273  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2013, 12:17 AM
tybuilding tybuilding is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 898
Transit trip to Abbotsford or Chilliwack anyone from Carvolth? http://www.abbynews.com/news/225402222.html

Just don't be late for the bus:

After years in the works, residents will soon be able to commute from Chilliwack to Abbotsford to Langley, and beyond, by public bus.

The Fraser Valley Express bus has been unanimously approved by the Fraser Valley Regional District at Tuesday's board meeting through a new bylaw.

"I'm pretty excited about this particular connection because finally, that invisible border between TransLink and the rest of the world will be erased," said FVRD director and Abbotsford mayor Bruce Banman. "People who want to get out of their cars to go to work will find a convenient way to do that…I think it's been that missing link that the public has been asking for for a long, long time."

For the first time, a BC Transit bus will seamlessly connect the three municipalities, which have a combined population of 317,000. The transportation authority is estimating 136,800 passenger trips annually.

The planned travel time from Chilliwack to Abbotsford is 30 minutes, with a total commute from Chilliwack to Langley in under one hour.

There will be a few stops in each municipality at key large centres, still to be worked out.

Already confirmed is a stop at Langley's Carvolth Transit Exchange, providing easy access to the SkyTrain via another express bus, as well as to neighbouring municipalities such as Surrey.

The Monday to Saturday service would run every 60-90 minutes during peak times, and 90-120 minutes off-peak.
     
     
  #11274  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2013, 4:01 AM
MetroRailRoad MetroRailRoad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 49
Tfhat is pretty exciting to see this launching. Ive been wanting a service to chilliwack for a while now
__________________
My rapid transit site
     
     
  #11275  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2013, 7:12 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
I look forward to the day when intelligent density development in Langley, Abbotsford and Chilliwack, provide enough density for a Valley rail commute, perhaps a follow-up outgrowth of this bus route initiative.
     
     
  #11276  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2013, 3:35 PM
idunno idunno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 939
60-90 minutes during peak times!!? Better be 60 minutes (at least on the hour to make schedules simpler). I would hope demand forces that frequency to improve in the near future. But we'll see how it goes.
     
     
  #11277  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2013, 5:05 PM
go_leafs_go02 go_leafs_go02 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London, ON
Posts: 2,406
It definitely should be 60m frequency at a minimum at launch through the day.

Should be successful off the bat.

Only hope I have is that it runs along Highway 1 with limited stops and diversions off the highway. Ie, stop at the McCallum Road Park & Ride by the Abbotsford rink, and don't end up somewhere downtown.

Hopefully this also paves the way to future improvements to Highway 1 in the corridor. I'd prefer to see the 3 + 1 HOV/BUS extend to Abbotsford, and then 3 general purpose lanes to Chilliwack.
     
     
  #11278  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2013, 5:19 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by idunno View Post
60-90 minutes during peak times!!? Better be 60 minutes (at least on the hour to make schedules simpler).
It can't be "on the hour" at every stop. It's probably more important to try to synch it's stops with connecting services.
     
     
  #11279  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2013, 7:04 PM
idunno idunno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 939
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
It can't be "on the hour" at every stop. It's probably more important to try to synch it's stops with connecting services.
Yeah I guess I kind of meant at a set hourly time instead of the 90 minute or another random frequency, which is a bit easier to remember.

Never underestimate the power of a schedule that reads something like 'It's on the 00:46s' - the simpler, the better.
     
     
  #11280  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2013, 3:58 AM
xd_1771's Avatar
xd_1771 xd_1771 is offline
(daka_x)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,740
Video Link

O,O Has anyone seen this yet?

I certainly haven't, which is weird because I pass by the Edmonds maintenance yard every day and yet this passed right under my nose.

I did notice, however, that there has been a lot of work this month on restoring the tracks to the old Mk II factory. It's just about complete now.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:46 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.