Oh noes
say it ain't so.
Following the lead of Trump, apparently, my favorite CityLab writer, Laura Bliss is blaming immigrants.
Why Is L.A. Expanding Transit—and Losing Riders?
Trying to address this conundrum, it's a bit of rambling piece referencing various statistics and basic elements based on research done at UCLA which adds to the previous research out of USC.
But let me cut to the chase
It goes more to common sense than anything. Phoenix has a gazillion immigrants with Hispanic being ofc dominant. They make their living primarily in the landscape, hotel and restaurant businesses as well as construction and various building trades. The likelihood that transit would take them to their job sites is mighty slim. It can amaze how most seem to swing car ownership and I'd say typically they are a one and not two (or more) car families. They also carpool.
There's also some discussion of sprawl creating car dependency, yada yada and to an extent if you compare cities that sprawl with the Original Six transit cities that's a legitimate factor but it also misses the point.
One might recall (or not) I've previously suggested that Denver is or is likely become a 'hybrid city' having both areas of density and sprawl. It's not strictly a black/white picture. And to assume that most lower socioeconomic and immigrant residents are transit dependent is a fallacy. If RTD is to bring riders into the city center then it needs to cater to those working downtown and not doing suburban landscape maintenance or house painting. Ofc, that's also where first and last-mile issues come into play.
It's also why Denveright/Denver Transit can make a significant contribution.