HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1101  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 12:55 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 26,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
You could argue that community centres compete against gyms and country clubs too. Public art galleries compete against private art galleries. Busses compete against taxis. City golf courses compete against private golf courses. Park concession stands compete against local restaurants. None of this is bad. More competition is good.
Does Vancouver have any private art galleries that aren’t commercial enterprises (ie.exist to only sell art)?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1102  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 1:09 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 7,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Does Vancouver have any private art galleries that aren’t commercial enterprises (ie.exist to only sell art)?
We have art galleries like Equinox that show artist's work that you can go and look at without having to register, or buy anything. Unlike the 'public' Art Gallery in the City of Vancouver, they're also free to visit all the time. And if you choose, you can usually buy the artwork.

On the north shore, the Polygon gallery operates entirely on the basis of voluntary donations. For several years, Bob Rennie also provided free curated exhibitions of contemporary art, but he sold the building for the Chinese Museum a few years ago.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1103  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 2:45 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,650
Final CLT panel in for Vienna House

https://www.instagram.com/p/DFypM8MyjP8/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1104  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 3:34 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Does Vancouver have any private art galleries that aren’t commercial enterprises (ie.exist to only sell art)?
Not really private, but also the Belkin Art Gallery at UBC:

https://belkin.ubc.ca/about/

... and the Bill Reid Gallery (at Cathedral Place):

https://www.billreidgallery.ca/#

... and the Contemporary Art Gallery (in the Mondrian condo tower):
https://cagvancouver.org/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1105  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 4:00 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,895
Vancouver's bad at management for not always having funding for stuff they want to do... but they're also greedy for trying to raise funding at market rate? Seems a little unreasonable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1106  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 7:46 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,022
Arlo
(Fraser St.)

From Strand Dev twitter Jan 29th


https://x.com/Stranddev/status/1884662293453250560
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1107  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 7:49 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,022
The Dunbar

Strand twitter Jan 16th:


https://x.com/Stranddev/status/1879989753501872304
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1108  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 11:10 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,794
8080 Yukon, replacing 90 apartments in the existing buildings a block from Marine Drive Station.

Quote:
Rezoning 8080 Yukon Street from CD-1 (88) to a new CD-1 under the Marpole Community Plan to permit the development of four new buildings with a total of 847 Social Housing units. A density of 6.99 FSR is proposed. A building height of six-storeys is dedicated for seniors social housing. The other three buildings are at a height of 20-storeys, 28-storeys, and 32-storeys. A total of 207 vehicle parking stalls, 4 Class A and 5 Class B loading spaces, 816 Class A bicycle parking, and 48 Class B bicycle parking spaces are proposed in three levels of underground parking.
https://plposweb.vancouver.ca/Public...ctId=253016401
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1109  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 5:09 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,333
Without googling can somebody tell me what Class A vs B bicycle parking is? Individual lockers? Power included?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1110  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 6:23 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Without googling can somebody tell me what Class A vs B bicycle parking is? Individual lockers? Power included?
Class A seems to be secured bicycle room type storage vs Class B which are short-term racks. Class A includes end of trip facilites etc depending on the number of bikes.

https://bylaws.vancouver.ca/parking/sec06.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1111  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 7:34 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Class A seems to be secured bicycle room type storage vs Class B which are short-term racks. Class A includes end of trip facilites etc depending on the number of bikes.

https://bylaws.vancouver.ca/parking/sec06.pdf
Thanks. Less exciting than I had hoped.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1112  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 7:42 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,663
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Thanks. Less exciting than I had hoped.
City by-law has additional requirements for Class A which list minimum number of secured lockers, oversized stalls, but so far no requirement for charging as it's currently the practice for folks to take their battery back up to their unit and consume power on their dime.

Speaking strictly about Vancouver
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1113  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 9:42 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
City by-law has additional requirements for Class A which list minimum number of secured lockers, oversized stalls, but so far no requirement for charging as it's currently the practice for folks to take their battery back up to their unit and consume power on their dime.

Speaking strictly about Vancouver
My building (completed in 2016) has an extensive amount of plugs in the bicycle rooms. I don't know if many people charge their bikes down there, but I assumed it was code to supply so much power. Only 1/3rd or so of our parking stalls have plugs.

Both bike and car parking are on individual breakers too, which is overkill for the bikes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1114  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2025, 8:04 PM
griswold griswold is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 169
Across the street from Oakridge. 41st & Cambie



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1115  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2025, 2:45 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,650
Inside The City Of Vancouver Housing Development Office With Director Brad Foster

Quote:
We are under more scrutiny than most developers, because we are public. I mean, Howard, you're going to be looking at every single rezoning application I put in from now on, and I'm sure of it, right? Because you want to know what we're doing. And we appreciate that scrutiny. And, by the way, that scrutiny extends to our planning and development services unit — the regulatory side of the house. The VHDO represents the land owner side of the house. We face exactly the same processes, the same scrutiny on policy and form of development just like any other developer does. And I would say more so.

Some opinionated real estate agents have said this, but there's no elbowing our way to the front of anything. We're in line just like everybody else. To us, it's a story of success that will include the local development and investment community. We are going to try and participate more fully as an equity partner. But we can't do it alone. We need the development community's expertise as development managers, as finance experts, we're also going to need very large-scale equity contributions to finance these projects. So this notion that there's an 'us versus them' situation is untrue. And in my view, it's really a negative overreaction by an insecure minority.
We've taken this project to all of the top developers in the Lower Mainland. We've sat down with all of them, presentations with UDI, with the Board of Trade. We talked to everybody. Colliers did a bunch of work for us on market testing. We have a strong finance team and a strong development team, but we want to make sure that we're testing our assumptions all the time, because it's a complicated business, there's a lot to know, and we want to make sure we have the best eyes on what we're doing.
Quote:
Yeah, that's the idea. We're going to rezone the land and that rezoned land would be our equity, potentially, in that development deal, and we would bring a development deal to the market. That would have to be through a public and transparent process, obviously, to identify what we're looking for and hope to achieve and see what comes. I think there's a lot of great developers right here in our backyard that are going to be very excited about this. That's probably the process that we'll see unfold in the next couple of years.
I mean, the City of Vancouver isn't going to go borrow $600 million anytime soon. It can't do that for a development project. We'll have to rely — just like developers — on equity markets, private equity. For construction financing, naturally, we'll look to our provincial partners, our federal partners potentially, but the private community's doing that as well. In a sense, we're doing all the same things. The big difference here is that all of the cash flow and value that we generate goes back to the public. We're not putting rubber on the Bentley, you know what I mean? Everything that we do goes back to public benefit, but it's going to require private markets for us to succeed, for sure. 100%.
Quote:
No. These are large projects — like four million square feet of residential. That's a lot, right? So I think once we get rolling, we'll probably start with — we don't even know yet, we're still doing that analysis — probably one of the more modest projects. Not that any of these are really modest. What's the deal structure look like? How are we taking these to market? Who's going to be our development partner? That's all part of the mix and the decision-making that we still need to make once we get the sites zoned.
https://storeys.com/vancouver-housin...e-brad-foster/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1116  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2025, 4:59 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,650
1441 Creekside is on the market (the credit union building next to the old Molson plant/Senakw)

Quote:
1441 Creekside Drive, Vancouver (the “Property”) is an exceptionally-located Kitsilano waterfront redevelopment property that offers unrestricted views of Downtown, North Shore Mountains and False Creek. The property is currently improved with a 9-storey, 134,000 SF office building with underground parking, and occupied 100% by Central 1. Situated adjacent to major developments such as Senákw and Quantum Park, the future redevelopment potential of 1441 Creekside Drive makes this a rare and premium opportunity for investors.
Quote:
It is believed, based on the recent actions and direction of the City, and Province, regarding increasing residential development density and policies, that the site could potentially be developed to accommodate two towers above a multi-storey podium with heights in the 35-40 storeys range.
https://www.cbre.ca/properties/offic...lumbia-v6j-4s8
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1117  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2025, 9:24 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by gaviscon View Post
Dev app perm has been submitted for 3362-3384 Vanness Ave and 3347 Clive Ave



https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/3362-33...47-clive-ave-2
They aren’t wasting any time, construction building permit was submitted in January.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1118  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2025, 10:47 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,650
The 3362 Vanness strata windup was for $41,400,000 (?)

https://vancouvermarket.ca/2024/10/1...lingwood-site/

Quote:
Current Status/Sale to Intracorp

On September 9, 2024, the windup and sale of the Joyce Place lands to Intracorp completed (and notice of registration has now been issued by the Land Title Office). All owners have picked up, or made arrangements to receive, their share of the sale proceeds in accordance with their individual vendor’s statements of adjustments and trust reconciliation.

However, at closing Intracorp disputed its liability to pay the purchase price adjustment (“PPA”) as set out in Schedule ‘G’ of the PSA and did not pay that sum on closing. Further, Intracorp alleges that the Joyce Place Strata was in breach of the PSA for failing to maintain the buildings adequately. Specifically, asserted that the fire alarm system was not working and that the eight townhouses were in disrepair and subject to a by-law prosecution by the City of Vancouver.

​On September 9, 2024, Intracorp commenced a civil claim against the Joyce Place Strata and the Liquidator for the alleged breaches of the PSA (the “Intracorp Claim”). Intracorp also obtained a court order that the Liquidator must hold in trust at least $525,000 of the Joyce Place Strata special levy funds as security for the Intracorp claim pending further court order or an agreement between the parties. As a result, a significant portion of the strata levy funds continue to be held back in the trust account of Lawson Lundell LLP pending further direction of the Court.

Copies of the Intracorp Claim. Affidavit material and the court order are available for download at the links below under the heading Intracorp Claim.

Liquidator’s Application for Directions

The Liquidator filed an application in the Wind-Up Petition seeking leave of the Court to defend the claim by Intracorp, to pursue legal proceedings by way of counterclaim against Intracorp for its failure to pay the PPA to owners and to address the use of the Joyce Place Strata funds that remain with the Liquidator. That application was heard and granted by Justice Francis on October 4, 2024. A copy of the entered court order is available for download at the links below under the heading Wind-Up Petition at item #45.

The Liquidator will be filing a Response to Civil Claim in the Intracorp Claim and a counterclaim seeking payment of the purchase price adjustment. Once those pleadings are filed, they will be posted to this website.

​PSA Density Bonus

Schedule ‘F’ of the PSA provides for the possible payment of a Density Bonus. Under the PSA, the Density Bonus, if any, would be payable at the time of the “Construction Commencement Date”, should Intracorp demolish and redevelop within the next 5 years. As a result, the Density Bonus is not immediately payable. The Density Bonus is contingent upon a series of future events, such as Intracorp obtaining its permits from City of Vancouver, etc.

​Former Joyce Place Strata owners may have a future claim for the Density Bonus if Intracorp does proceed with redevelopment. In completing the closing, the Liquidator explicitly reserved the rights of the owners to pursue Intracorp for both the PPA and the Density Bonus in future, should one become payable.
https://www.joyceplacestrata.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1119  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2025, 6:28 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,794
1716 Clark, on the SE corner at 1st Ave, had a building permit approved for soil remediation back in December. Now, the last few cars that had been stored on the site have been moved so we may actually see something happening.
The cardlock that previously occupied the site was demolished almost a decade ago.

Four years ago an initial submission was made for a 3fsr commercial building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1120  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2025, 5:09 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,065
There's a new proposal for a 26 story rental tower that falls under the provincially legislated land use policy for Skytrain stations. The Province calls for 5FSR/20 stories for this site. The developer is asking for 10.24 FSR. Makes me wonder if we can expect density in this range (or even higher) for future proposals around this and other Skytrain stations.




https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/gec-...enue-vancouver
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:43 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.