Quote:
Originally Posted by exit2lef
I'd love to know more about the lawsuit and the settlement. For almost three decades, I've been hearing that Barron Collier was going to eventually develop that land in a big way. I wonder what happened to cause it to revert to the federal government.
Yes, it would be nice to have it developed in a way that respected the site's history and exposed the park a bit more. I've always felt that Phoenix got the worst outcome in the three-way land deal that occurred among the feds, the city, and Barron Collier. This might help mitigate that mistake from almost 30 years ago.
I posted a comment about the geographic error. We'll see if it gets fixed.
|
A summary of the history of the litigation is detailed in
this opinion from Barron's case against the Government in the Federal Court of Claims, as well as
this opinion in the Government's case against Barron in Arizona federal court.
From what I can tell, Collier had a $34m note to the Government as a result of the land swap. Collier defaulted in 2012, and tried to give the Government a deed in lieu and just walk away from the property (because the property was apparently worth much less than the balance on the note). Apparently part of the deal was that Collier had an obligation to put up government bonds as additional collateral if the property ever fell below 130% of the value of the note. Government sued for specific performance of this obligation.
Unclear from the opinions what the terms of the settlement were, but interesting stuff (for those that find this kind of stuff interesting).