HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1081  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2014, 8:54 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,485
Fantastic! Surrey has done an excellent job with its new city hall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1082  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2014, 9:07 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,947
Very nice indeed! I just hope they have a stockpile of extra glass panes to quickly replace the ones that will be acid etched by useless assholes. On that note, I really, really wish the acid etched glass panes at Robson Square would be replaced, been like that for years...

There must be some sort of pull off film or cover that can be placed on glass to help stop such damage??
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1083  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2014, 10:52 PM
Nites Nites is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,558
What are they building behind City Hall on 104 Ave? Just saw a large pit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1084  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2014, 10:56 PM
Urbansound Urbansound is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Surrey
Posts: 9
that pit it referenced here: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=199413&page=5

It's another one of Bosa's developments
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1085  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2014, 1:55 AM
nickinacan's Avatar
nickinacan nickinacan is offline
Traveller Extraodinaire
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 355
One thing that is a bit concerning though is that all the development and new facilities are in the southern portion of the city centre around King George and Surrey Central Stations. Nothing seems to be materializing around Gateway. Aside from the Chuck Bailey Centre that was built for the Olympic Volunteer training, there has been no investment by the city to add anything new or clean up the area between Gateway and King George Blvd. Any thoughts on what could be done to revitalize the North End?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1086  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2014, 2:50 AM
Blease Blease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 550
There's office towers slated to go up by Gateway station. Much discussed on Skyscraperpage, if I'm not wrong.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1087  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2014, 5:54 AM
Spork's Avatar
Spork Spork is offline
Shoebox Dweller
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,784
The city is better off to focus on one area than spread out. In fact, I think the focus around the new city centre is a good sign, because it means that a "downtown" could materialize sooner (10-15y) rather than later.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1088  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2014, 11:03 AM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
last i check city point isn't that old yet. There is also gateway which turn from a tall office tower to now just a smalled office tower with a retail base. As for other things in that area I remember talking with a city a long time back and they were wanting to do something to note the old Whalleys corner area. haven't heard much on that lately but I am really hoping its still in the plans.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1089  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2014, 4:21 AM
nickinacan's Avatar
nickinacan nickinacan is offline
Traveller Extraodinaire
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 355
I understand that they are focusing on the Surrey Central area as the core, and it makes perfect sense why.I do know of the commercial and the other planned residential towers, but I am talking mainly about cleaning up the area to get it primed for redevelopment.

My question is, what could be done in the area? It is easily the most derelict part of the area, especially the sections of the City Parkway and 135A Street between 106 and 108 Avenues. It is essentially a mini-DTES. Most of this area are things like the Surrey Food Bank, multiple Addiction and Health Services, and a bottle depot to top it off. Of course services like these are needed in any big city, and they shouldn't just be displaced.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1090  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2014, 7:19 AM
Cypherus's Avatar
Cypherus Cypherus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickinacan View Post
I understand that they are focusing on the Surrey Central area as the core, and it makes perfect sense why.I do know of the commercial and the other planned residential towers, but I am talking mainly about cleaning up the area to get it primed for redevelopment.

My question is, what could be done in the area? It is easily the most derelict part of the area, especially the sections of the City Parkway and 135A Street between 106 and 108 Avenues. It is essentially a mini-DTES. Most of this area are things like the Surrey Food Bank, multiple Addiction and Health Services, and a bottle depot to top it off. Of course services like these are needed in any big city, and they shouldn't just be displaced.
The area will eventually be developed but it is not going to happen overnight. It is going to appear derelict or unsavory until economic pressures influence development. To get a sense of what the area may look like in a number of years,



The City also has a land use plan for the area:
http://www.surrey.ca/files/City_Centre_Land_Use_Concept_Appendix_I.pdf

You can see that the city envisions mid-hi-rise mixed use density.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1091  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2014, 6:23 AM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
Gateway is a lot cleaner than it was when I was growing up but does have a long way to go.

The biggest issues are reputation and facilities that pull in "undesirables". Reputation is tough and really requires time.

Facilities is something Surrey can deal with along with developers. Bosa purchased the Dell shopping mall and demolished the Dell which was home to undesirables. The Flamingo is still there but will be demod for Quatros next big project.

Those focal points both being gone will mean a certain clientel will start to disperse. Some social assistance places have also been moving to the hospital district so that too moves clientel out of there.

Unfortunately it just moves people and the biggest issue will be these types of people moving to other parts of Surrey or even metro Van. One city's problems suddenly become another city's problem.

That said, Gateway is definately on the right path development wise. I just fear the people in that area that truely need help will simply be moved somewhere else. Why the government felt it a good idea to close mental hospitals putting many of those patients on the streets into the hands of drug dealers and that fact each of us voting public gave then license to do that is still beyond me.

Thats a rant for a different topic though.

Dev wise, Gateway will get some love too it just has a few more hurtles to jump over than Surrey Central and KGB.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1092  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2014, 7:28 AM
Blease Blease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 550
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhausner View Post
Gateway is a lot cleaner than it was when I was growing up but does have a long way to go.

The biggest issues are reputation and facilities that pull in "undesirables". Reputation is tough and really requires time.

Facilities is something Surrey can deal with along with developers. Bosa purchased the Dell shopping mall and demolished the Dell which was home to undesirables. The Flamingo is still there but will be demod for Quatros next big project.

Those focal points both being gone will mean a certain clientel will start to disperse. Some social assistance places have also been moving to the hospital district so that too moves clientel out of there.

Unfortunately it just moves people and the biggest issue will be these types of people moving to other parts of Surrey or even metro Van. One city's problems suddenly become another city's problem.

That said, Gateway is definately on the right path development wise. I just fear the people in that area that truely need help will simply be moved somewhere else. Why the government felt it a good idea to close mental hospitals putting many of those patients on the streets into the hands of drug dealers and that fact each of us voting public gave then license to do that is still beyond me.

Thats a rant for a different topic though.

Dev wise, Gateway will get some love too it just has a few more hurtles to jump over than Surrey Central and KGB.
Jhausner, I love your positive outlook for Surrey City Centre AND the way you alway back it up with numbers and hard facts, very cool indeed. Hope you can stay in the area and in the virtual community for a long time to come.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1093  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2014, 7:26 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
I drove the length of King George Blvd for the first time in a long time last weekend and it still has a long, long way to go just to get to "average suburb" status. The new developments are great but there are so many bad parts left, and I didn't realize Affliction t-shirts were still so popular.

P.S. Not trying to troll, just my honest opinion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1094  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2014, 7:54 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinion View Post
P.S. Not trying to troll, just my honest opinion.
As somebody who is at Surrey Central 1-2 times per week, I agree. But the SDL (Surrey Defense League) will be here in no time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1095  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2014, 11:44 PM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinion View Post
I drove the length of King George Blvd for the first time in a long time last weekend and it still has a long, long way to go just to get to "average suburb" status. The new developments are great but there are so many bad parts left, and I didn't realize Affliction t-shirts were still so popular.

P.S. Not trying to troll, just my honest opinion.
Can't disagree with you. The worst area is between 104th and about Bolivar (though it does extend a bit further in either direction) especially along KGB. The biggest changes though are happening around 104th and KG Station. Bosa now owns all the land between 104th and 105th where the TD stands now which includes some old buildings and a lot of open lots. That is planned to be all redeveloped with some fairly substantial projects.

The stretch though then from 105th to 108th is a lot of older industry and open lots that really drag the area down from a looks and function perspective. Personally I find most of "Surrey Central" seems to extend from 96th Ave to about 104th then it is kind of a no-mans land until 108th which is just a few pockets right around SkyTrain and where Quatro is.

For it to really start standing out, the west side of KGB between 104th and 108th needs some serious re-development along with the Dell shopping mall completely being re-developed and Quatro extending beyond Whalley Boulevard all the way to KGB.

If that is all done along with Bosa's project, then it will look light-years different in the area.

But you're spot on. It still has a long long ways to go as a unified community.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1096  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2014, 11:52 PM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
As somebody who is at Surrey Central 1-2 times per week, I agree. But the SDL (Surrey Defense League) will be here in no time.
Lol If I'm included in the SDL (or their Mayor so to speak), I'll side note that I only get pissy at comments when people post comments that are just filled with logical fallacy after logical fallacy. If people back comments up with real facts and figures, with true representation, and don't hold Surrey to a special account they are unwilling to hold other cities too in Metro Vancouver, then I get annoyed.

Comments like "Surrey must mandate mixed use everywhere for it to not be as sucky as it is!" when no other city does, and no other city is held to account. It annoys me a bit.

Or when people say "All of Surrey is filled with just a bunch of redneck guys with pickup trucks and easy girls" then I just sigh and shake my head.

But saying "X area in Surrey needs to really fix Y because of Z" and it makes sense and is true, I'm all for it. Gateway needs to be cleaned up. There are a lot of areas in Surrey Central that are far from being called a true suburb or even urban area.

If someone though instead of saying the above says "Man Whalley is garbage and filled with nothing but druggies, they really should get with the program if they ever want to be considered in the same breath as Vancouver" which is often stated in different language but along the exact same lines, then I just sigh at the poster's ignoring the DTES which is light years beyond anything you find in the vast majority of all other parts of Metro-Vancouver including Surrey.

Are there parts that needs addressing. Absolutely. I just like reasonable facts, figures, and a logical basis behind comments and opinion.

As I mentioned in a previous post, a lot of the issues with Surrey's development environment is centered around reputation and perception, and unfortunately to-date, a fair amount of the overall Surrey reputation is completely unfounded. I just like to combat those perceptions and opinions back to the real world.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1097  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2014, 6:00 AM
Jack Guevara Jack Guevara is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 47
It would be great to hear of new projects in the middle part of Whalley. jhousner you mentioned Bosa who owns land around city hall. What they're doing is great, but it doesn't go far enough for connecting Gateway and Surrey Central and connecting the surrey skyline.

Is there any other group above 104th and below 108th that could make some significant progress? What can be done with that land? community gardens, government buildings, office buildings? It's great that Surrey is building all these towers, but when I look out the skytrain windows I see underdeveloped empty lots between gateway and central. When those lots get developed(if they ever do), it would have such a profound and positive impact in the urban feeling of downtown Surrey. I hope this happens sooner than later.

Jack

P.s You haters have no business trolling this page. I come here to read about new developments in Surrey, not your ignorant opinions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1098  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2014, 4:01 PM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Guevara View Post
It would be great to hear of new projects in the middle part of Whalley. jhousner you mentioned Bosa who owns land around city hall. What they're doing is great, but it doesn't go far enough for connecting Gateway and Surrey Central and connecting the surrey skyline.

Is there any other group above 104th and below 108th that could make some significant progress? What can be done with that land? community gardens, government buildings, office buildings? It's great that Surrey is building all these towers, but when I look out the skytrain windows I see underdeveloped empty lots between gateway and central. When those lots get developed(if they ever do), it would have such a profound and positive impact in the urban feeling of downtown Surrey. I hope this happens sooner than later.

Jack

P.s You haters have no business trolling this page. I come here to read about new developments in Surrey, not your ignorant opinions.
I agree. When you look at the overall map of the area the blocks you're referencing are bound by University Drive to KGB and 105th to 108th. So basically 4 x 4 blocks (Surrey blocks).

In that you have a rather large empty lot beside City Point on both sides. There is also an open lot just South of 108th by where 107a would bunch through to KGB. Next there are 3 empty lots along 105a close to KGB and the two large lots next to SkyTrain between 105a and 105.

The rest are at varying degrees of redevelopment potential. For example there is the strip-mall on the South-West corner of KGB and 108th. I don't see that going anywhere. You then have the stretch of commercial from that mall along KGB to 107a. There have been a few small-scale buildings built along there but I have a hunch much of that land developers are waiting to see what Bosa does across the street with the Dell mall property.

The rest I have a feeling that you won't see any movement until the edges start to push those directions. For example it would be difficult as a developer to build a shining new residential/commercial mixed-use building at the corner of 105a and City Parkway basically no-man's land while it is surrounded by open lots and derelict light industrial/commercial buildings.

If you want an example of the development trend I envision, look to Burnaby between Edmonds and Royal Oak. There is a lot of light industry/commercial area but residential has been pushing through over the last 10-15 years. You see more and more new residential developments, condos, townhomes, etc. But they originated around Royal Oak and Edmonds and we're only seeing them because those areas are spreading outwards into the industrial land between.

Same deal here. As Bosa builds to the South you'll probably see development proposals for the land just North of 105 Ave. As those start being built you'll see more proposals north of 105a.

One thing a lot of people maybe don't realize is that around Gateway there have been dozens of large scale proposals. There have been 5-8 highrises proposed then put on hold then cancelled over the past 15 years. There are about 5 on the books right now that are "on hold." It is still not a developer friendly neighborhood I think and that is evident by the snails pace of Quatro's development.

Yes they had a massive fire that set them back on one of the buildings, but I've received so many E-mails encouraging me to buy units, that it shows me they aren't selling like hot-cakes so the demand is still difficult in that area largely because of the area itself and the reputation it still has and to a degree warrants.

So while I completely agree, I have a feeling from a development perspective, you'll see most of the development continue around Surrey Central, King George, and the Hospital District. It's just easier to sell and they already have a leg-up reputation wise.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1099  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2014, 4:12 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Guevara View Post
P.s You haters have no business trolling this page. I come here to read about new developments in Surrey, not your ignorant opinions.
Your post was almost identical to this "hater's." I want to see Surrey succeed and read the Surrey threads as a result.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1100  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2014, 8:50 AM
CoryHolmes CoryHolmes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,031
Does anyone know why 103 Ave @ University was blocked off with a row of concrete blocks, then a skeleton of a wooden fence, and finally the wooden fence growing north to block off the vacant lot?

I want to think good things are happening, but I'd rather know for sure
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:59 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.