HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1081  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 3:08 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
My point is I am not crazy on a arena and new field together if it costs us valuable space in the core that could be put to a much better use if we are only talking about fitting an arena in the space.
Condo towers on each corner of the field to support the lights! Also, it might be a suitable use of space for 30 years as development catches up to the amount of needed land.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1082  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 3:22 PM
kw5150's Avatar
kw5150 kw5150 is offline
Here and There
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,807
Well, we do need somewhere for the homeless people to go after hours.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
Your answer illustrates my point exactly. If something like this was to go in the west village there would be little to no room for residential and other uses to build on the site, so you'd end up with the same dead zone on non-event nights.

I just don't see that as a real gain over what is there right now in that case.
__________________
Renfrew, Calgary, Alberta.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1083  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 4:00 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
I guess they`ve never heard of Edmonton`s old OMNIPLEX proposal!

source:http://thesummitproject.blogspot.ca/2010/10/it-is-election-day-in-edmonton.html
Dang, but Edmonton dreamed large in the 60s and 70s.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1084  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 4:05 PM
Spring2008 Spring2008 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lower Mount Royal, Calgary
Posts: 5,147
If they're going to build a new stadium, better have a retractable roof. I'd like to see a MLS team here among other possibilities the roof would create.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1085  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 4:53 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 25,140
So if they do build a new football stadium, what would happen to McMahon?

I think the West Village is a perfect place for an entertainment district. If they put something there for amenities that are open on non event nights, there will be enough people in the surrounding areas to keep the tumbleweeds away.
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1086  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 5:11 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
My point is I am not crazy on a arena and new field together if it costs us valuable space in the core that could be put to a much better use if we are only talking about fitting an arena in the space.
I think that an arena + stadium (retractable roof) would be much more than two sporting facilities, as they would allow for certain types of conferences to occur, and then between those events and the sporting events, would allow for enough critical mass for other service industry developments in and around the site. Whether East Village or West Village, the key for it to be a conference facility would be to not only closely integrate with an LRT location, but also have that LRT station be part of the central free-fare zone. If not, it could still work, as long as the city has the mechanism for extending such privileges to conference attendees. The latter solution is much less preferable though.

Last edited by suburbia; May 10, 2013 at 5:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1087  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 5:21 PM
nick.flood's Avatar
nick.flood nick.flood is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,261
delete

Last edited by nick.flood; Feb 5, 2016 at 6:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1088  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 5:38 PM
Black Star Black Star is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 7,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Dang, but Edmonton dreamed large in the 60s and 70s.


We still dream large.....but at a snail's pace.

I think this will change in the comming years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1089  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 5:59 PM
Barnes's Avatar
Barnes Barnes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by suburbia View Post
I think that an arena + stadium (retractable roof) would be much more than two sporting facilities, as they would allow for certain types of conferences to occur, and then between those events and the sporting events, would allow for enough critical mass for other service industry developments in and around the site. Whether East Village or West Village, the key for it to be a conference facility would be to not only closely integrate with an LRT location, but also have that LRT station be part of the central free-fare zone. If not, it could still work, as long as the city has the mechanism for extending such privileges to conference attendees. The latter solution is much less preferable though.
I have attended a number if conferences at the BMO Centre that allowed you to travel on transit for free with your badge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1090  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 6:04 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnes View Post
I have attended a number if conferences at the BMO Centre that allowed you to travel on transit for free with your badge.
I've been involved with several larger events that skip the BMO centre / Calgary completely because of the site and facility's limitations. The 'free with your badge' thing is a much lower interest solution, as I stated in my prior note. Firstly, you don't get a badge till you get to the event. Second, it isn't actually free, the conference has to pay for it. That's okay, but the proof is in the pudding with the largest events don't make a stop. You might ask why would we need to provide this anyway? Because there are not enough hotel room within two blocks of the facility. Plus, BMO centre capacity is a real issue, given lack of exit doors from the larger hall and minuscule foyer space that can't even manage registration requirements for an event with, say 10K people. The comic show doesn't qualify for the types of events I'm talking about.

Last edited by suburbia; May 10, 2013 at 6:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1091  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 6:08 PM
kora kora is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Victoria
Posts: 816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian View Post
I think the West Village is a perfect place for an entertainment district. If they put something there for amenities that are open on non event nights, there will be enough people in the surrounding areas to keep the tumbleweeds away.
I think one problem with West Village is that they didn't build the Sunalta station platforms wide enough to handle such major traffic coming on and off the trains. The platforms are narrow. It's built more as a community station, rather than a metropolitan one. Compare with Westbrook station which has wider platforms. Would they need to upgrade Sunalta station?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1092  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 6:08 PM
Riise's Avatar
Riise Riise is offline
City Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary | London
Posts: 3,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
Just how much space would something like this take up in the west village though? Would there be any space left afterward for any level of development to not leave the place a ghost town on night where there are no events?
I'm with Bigtime. It takes a lot of quality design work to ensure that large scale developments like a single arena/stadium fit seamlessly into urban areas. Trying to fit two would be a major endevaour and while were growing in our design capabilities as a city, it might be biting off more than we can chew.
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”
- Roberta Brandes Gratz
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1093  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 6:13 PM
Riise's Avatar
Riise Riise is offline
City Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary | London
Posts: 3,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by kora View Post
I think one problem with West Village is that they didn't build the Sunalta station platforms wide enough to handle such major traffic coming on and off the trains. The platforms are narrow. It's built more as a community station, rather than a metropolitan one. Compare with Westbrook station which has wider platforms. Would they need to upgrade Sunalta station?
With the size of station in general you could most likely set up a queuing system to manage the crowds and ensure platform safety.
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”
- Roberta Brandes Gratz
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1094  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 6:35 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 25,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by kora View Post
I think one problem with West Village is that they didn't build the Sunalta station platforms wide enough to handle such major traffic coming on and off the trains. The platforms are narrow. It's built more as a community station, rather than a metropolitan one. Compare with Westbrook station which has wider platforms. Would they need to upgrade Sunalta station?
I never considered that, might have to wander over to Sunalta station this weekend and take a look.
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1095  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 6:47 PM
Barnes's Avatar
Barnes Barnes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by suburbia View Post
I've been involved with several larger events that skip the BMO centre / Calgary completely because of the site and facility's limitations. The 'free with your badge' thing is a much lower interest solution, as I stated in my prior note. Firstly, you don't get a badge till you get to the event. Second, it isn't actually free, the conference has to pay for it. That's okay, but the proof is in the pudding with the largest events don't make a stop. You might ask why would we need to provide this anyway? Because there are not enough hotel room within two blocks of the facility. Plus, BMO centre capacity is a real issue, given lack of exit doors from the larger hall and minuscule foyer space that can't even manage registration requirements for an event with, say 10K peopel. The comic show doesn't qualify for the types of events I'm talking about.
I don't think I was insisting that the BMO Centre was a good convention centre simply, that event organizers can and have in the past offered attendees transit for the duration of the conference with a badge. Expanding the free fare zone for everyone also represents an opportunity cost for Calgary Transit. Do they expand the free fare zone for that small number of people? When I am away at a conference, it's cabs, rental cars and shuttles anyways.

If new conference space is being planned, I am sure that whether or not these apparently destitute attendees are able to save 3 bucks is pretty low on the project plan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1096  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 7:17 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnes View Post
I don't think I was insisting that the BMO Centre was a good convention centre simply, that event organizers can and have in the past offered attendees transit for the duration of the conference with a badge. Expanding the free fare zone for everyone also represents an opportunity cost for Calgary Transit. Do they expand the free fare zone for that small number of people? When I am away at a conference, it's cabs, rental cars and shuttles anyways.
Most large conferences, and I'm talking 4K and up, require a lot of hotel event space in addition to the primary conference facility. I've spoken about the Canadian Cardiovascular Conference in the past, which dropped Calgary from the circuit years ago for lack of appropriate facilities / support facilities. Even when it is hosted at the huge Metro Toronto Convention Centre, it still requires the near-by hotels for symposia / satellite symposia / meetings of affiliated entities, etc. It is not just getting there in the morning and leaving at night.

I get your point about costs of adding another station to the free-fare zone, especially if it is seen as a subsidy to for-profit sporting outfits (the other / primary half of the equation). Need to mull it more ...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1097  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 7:19 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian View Post
I never considered that, might have to wander over to Sunalta station this weekend and take a look.
If something major like this were to be added off of Sunalta, could it be possible to have a platform on both sides of the tracks? I haven't poked around there enough / didn't pay attention, but that would be a huge plus and could more than mitigate the issue.

Last edited by suburbia; May 10, 2013 at 7:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1098  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 7:55 PM
Barnes's Avatar
Barnes Barnes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by suburbia View Post
Most large conferences, and I'm talking 4K and up, require a lot of hotel event space in addition to the primary conference facility. I've spoken about the Canadian Cardiovascular Conference in the past, which dropped Calgary from the circuit years ago for lack of appropriate facilities / support facilities. Even when it is hosted at the huge Metro Toronto Convention Centre, it still requires the near-by hotels for symposia / satellite symposia / meetings of affiliated entities, etc. It is not just getting there in the morning and leaving at night.

I get your point about costs of adding another station to the free-fare zone, especially if it is seen as a subsidy to for-profit sporting outfits (the other / primary half of the equation). Need to mull it more ...
I agree, Calgary severely lacks space for these types of conferences where smaller rooms are required for talks/presentations. In terms of exhibition space, Stampede is just ok. The GO Expo in June has 20,000 attendees and the Global petroleum Show is 63,000 but the conference side of both shows is really small in comparison.

Aside from what has been posted here in terms of hotel development, there are plenty of plans for even more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1099  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 8:20 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnes View Post
I agree, Calgary severely lacks space for these types of conferences where smaller rooms are required for talks/presentations. In terms of exhibition space, Stampede is just ok. The GO Expo in June has 20,000 attendees and the Global petroleum Show is 63,000 but the conference side of both shows is really small in comparison.

Aside from what has been posted here in terms of hotel development, there are plenty of plans for even more.
Just to clarify the Go Expo, Global petroleum Show and Comic show type numbers. Those are entries cumulatively totaled over the length of the event. It does not mean 63,000 people would be in the BMO centre for the global Petroleum Show. The space cannot hold those type of numbers - not even close.

I've been to an event, for example, with 35,000 attendees, but over the course of about 5 days, they would have been counted as ~300,000. Big difference between how the numbers are presented and the real number of people.

Anyway, next time I see Ken I'll asking him about the full breadth of what is being contemplated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1100  
Old Posted May 10, 2013, 8:36 PM
Barnes's Avatar
Barnes Barnes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by suburbia View Post
Just to clarify the Go Expo, Global petroleum Show and Comic show type numbers. Those are entries cumulatively totaled over the length of the event. It does not mean 63,000 people would be in the BMO centre for the global Petroleum Show. The space cannot hold those type of numbers - not even close.

I've been to an event, for example, with 35,000 attendees, but over the course of about 5 days, they would have been counted as ~300,000. Big difference between how the numbers are presented and the real number of people.

Anyway, next time I see Ken I'll asking him about the full breadth of what is being contemplated.
LOL, ok.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:07 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.