Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Dalton
Wow. Great to see the opposition to this is still being misconstrued as nimbyism. Apparently this Watson guy has no clue that there is a revitalization and economic development aspect to it, or pretends it doesn't exist.
|
Is there anywhere that a protest to the provincial level is being focussed? As, were I aware of somewhere to put down my name or a place to send a letter to, I would. I just don't have the time to hunt for this information myself right now.
I object to this entire proposal on the following grounds:
1) People should not be able to profit from buying a building, lying about their intentions, taking city money based upon those intentions and then letting the building become derelict. I would prefer the city to compulsory purchase the building back, at the price it was sold for, and the provincial money go to them.
2) There is already plenty of affordable housing downtown. Let's spread it out a little. I have no objections to such housing, merely the downtown density of it. Show me hard evidence of the benefit of such and I'll change my mind. Terraces on King, which is a nice looking building I'm happy with it, but I.V. is pretty dead around it and seems to have died further since its construction. And those are just my observations over the last 6 months of living here.