Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123
A "business case" only makes sense for something like this if you can quantify the benefit to the public. The overall benefit, not monetary profit, is why the HRM is looking at building a stadium.
Good to hear that they've commissioned a study that will put a variety of options on the table. It's usually a disaster when councillors speculate.
|
I received a message form Councillor Fisher who read your post:
Quote:
Hi Kevin,
Hope all is well. I see from skyscraper that your group is up to date on what is going on-good to see you all following along and posting your thoughts.
Please feel free to mention to someone123 that council is not paid to be experts on important municipal issues, we decide on important issues after gaining information from experts. Big difference. There are lots of hoops to go thru to get a stadium built, we deal with lots of personal attacks from the folks who don't want one built, but this seems to me to be the first Council bashing I have seen from someone who is in favour of a stadium.
Take care, all the best,
Darren
|
I believe Councillor Fisher's remarks were in a lighthearted manner. I have to agree, we tend to think that Councillors should know everything and be blamed for everything, which isn't really the case.
I really appreciate the fact that Mayor Kelly, Councillor Fisher, Councillor Hendsbee and Councillor Sloane are sticking their necks out to support a stadium and taking verbal shots from all the naysayers in the HRM (I don't mean someone123, I am thinking of the dedicated naysayers who oppose everything. I know that someone123 is in favour as are most people on this online forum.)