HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #10501  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2016, 5:54 AM
Hot Rod's Avatar
Hot Rod Hot Rod is offline
Big City Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle-Vancouver-Osaka-Chongqing-Chicago-OKC
Posts: 1,187
this might have some interest for YVR particularly with regard to potential for long-term Qantas operation:-

US denies American-Qantas alliance expansion.
     
     
  #10502  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2016, 6:12 AM
mezzanine's Avatar
mezzanine mezzanine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot Rod View Post
this might have some interest for YVR particularly with regard to potential for long-term Qantas operation:-

US denies American-Qantas alliance expansion.
or for a potential for YVR-MEL on AC

Quote:
With this increase in capacity, I'm really cheesed that AC and the Trudeau government are not willing to re-negotiate bilaterals with the UAE or Turkey and that Vancouver still doesn't have a direct flight to a Gulf destination or Istanbul, which is a few hours' flight time to most of the world's population. This is even considering:
The return of nonstop YVR-DEL
The state fuel subsidies that the ME3 get
The lack of O/D (or even business travel) traffic between Vancouver and the UAE--in aviation terms, Vancouver is the northern hemisphere's New Zealand; far away from everywhere else. At least SEA-DXB is justified because the flights ship cargo parts for a Boeing fleet based at Dubai International Airport.
How the ME3 massacred QF's longhaul market share
The political unrest in Turkey making a YVR-IST flight more of a can of worms
The AC/AS codeshare for YVR-SEA-DXB routings
I dunno. Look what YVR has versus SEA, from LeftCoast`s charts:


YVR:


SEA:


IMO Emirates is hoovering any current possibility for more direct transcontinental flights from SEA, especially with their 2 flights per day. If they were at YVR, it would hamper AC`s recent ability to build a hub at YVR which IMO is better for us and the local economy.

I`d be open to flights to IST on TK with cooperation with AC, but I see no will to move on it with the current situation in Turkey.
     
     
  #10503  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2016, 6:49 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
I think YvR is better off with out Emirates because it has allowed AC to build its hub and the airport to attract a wide variety of carriers and move towards becoming a connecting hub.
     
     
  #10504  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2016, 8:08 PM
CareerShow CareerShow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 196
Effective 29 October 2017 China airlines is beginning 5 weekly a359 XWB service. Nice to see another airline add the a350 to YVR.
     
     
  #10505  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2016, 9:32 PM
excel excel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,484
^Awesome.
     
     
  #10506  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2016, 10:32 PM
sacrifice333 sacrifice333 is offline
Vancouver User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by CareerShow View Post
Effective 29 October 2017 China airlines is beginning 5 weekly a359 XWB service. Nice to see another airline add the a350 to YVR.
Awesome! Apologies... I missed the other A350 airline/route though???
__________________
Check out TripStyler.com {locally focused travel blog} | My instagram {Travel Photos}
     
     
  #10507  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2016, 10:41 PM
POCO POCO is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by sacrifice333 View Post
Awesome! Apologies... I missed the other A350 airline/route though???
I think CX starts flying one around March.
     
     
  #10508  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2016, 5:04 AM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alpine View Post
I just found out that AC56/57 (YYZ-DXB) has been upgauged from a 789 to a 77W through the end of February 2017.

With this increase in capacity, I'm really cheesed that AC and the Trudeau government are not willing to re-negotiate bilaterals with the UAE or Turkey and that Vancouver still doesn't have a direct flight to a Gulf destination or Istanbul, which is a few hours' flight time to most of the world's population. This is even considering:
I believe Emirates was offered slots into Vancouver, but they wanted unrestricted Canada slots... which translated means they wanted daily service out of YYZ.

If the bilaterals were renegotiated, you can bet that YVR would NOT be getting much Emirates love.
     
     
  #10509  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2016, 2:41 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
I believe Emirates was offered slots into Vancouver, but they wanted unrestricted Canada slots... which translated means they wanted daily service out of YYZ.

If the bilaterals were renegotiated, you can bet that YVR would NOT be getting much Emirates love.
Would QR, say 3x per week from YVR would be doable. Probably not, but with with EK great white sharks, and IST nixed due to political turmoil, I though moderate Qatar service might be OK.
As things stand, we'll be left with "The Big 4," LHR, AMS, FRA, and CDG. That's OK, but developing our European ME system a bit would be even better, IMO

Last edited by trofirhen; Nov 20, 2016 at 2:57 PM.
     
     
  #10510  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2016, 5:02 PM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
Would QR, say 3x per week from YVR would be doable. Probably not, but with with EK great white sharks, and IST nixed due to political turmoil, I though moderate Qatar service might be OK.
As things stand, we'll be left with "The Big 4," LHR, AMS, FRA, and CDG. That's OK, but developing our European ME system a bit would be even better, IMO
Sounds like TAP Air Portugal is looking at going to Toronto and possibly Montreal. That would make a great airline into Vancouver. They offer some interesting connections into North Africa and southern Europe from Lisbon. However its probably unlikely.

Even more unlikely would be to attract them to Vancouver as a stop over between Lisbon and Macao. The operate the Lisbon to Macca flight for a very short time many many years ago, however it flew the other direction over Russia.
     
     
  #10511  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2016, 5:22 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by casper View Post
Sounds like TAP Air Portugal is looking at going to Toronto and possibly Montreal. That would make a great airline into Vancouver. They offer some interesting connections into North Africa and southern Europe from Lisbon. However its probably unlikely.

Even more unlikely would be to attract them to Vancouver as a stop over between Lisbon and Macao. The operate the Lisbon to Macca flight for a very short time many many years ago, however it flew the other direction over Russia.
Agreed that TAP Air Portugal might make a great airline into Vancouver, but I doubt they'll ever be granted landing rights here, so you might as well forget it.
Sorry. I think we're stuck with what we have as Trans-Atlantic for another decade
     
     
  #10512  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2016, 5:30 PM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
Agreed that TAP Air Portugal might make a great airline into Vancouver, but I doubt they'll ever be granted landing rights here, so you might as well forget it.
Sorry. I think we're stuck with what we have as Trans-Atlantic for another decade
I agree it is very unlikely we are even on their radar screen. They would be a great addition.
     
     
  #10513  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2016, 10:32 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
As much as it would be nice for me to have TAP here, it isn't any agreement keeping them out, it's simply supply and demand. There is not the demand to warrant it unfortunately.
     
     
  #10514  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2016, 3:04 AM
Cage Cage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YYC
Posts: 2,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
Would QR, say 3x per week from YVR would be doable. Probably not, but with with EK great white sharks, and IST nixed due to political turmoil, I though moderate Qatar service might be OK.
As things stand, we'll be left with "The Big 4," LHR, AMS, FRA, and CDG. That's OK, but developing our European ME system a bit would be even better, IMO
MAD might be a good candidate for addition to the list if euro hubs.
__________________
United Premier a Elite latte lifter. Climber of swanky bridges.
     
     
  #10515  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2016, 4:08 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cage View Post
MAD might be a good candidate for addition to the list if euro hubs.
I've sometimes wondered about Madrid, too. But as jlousa said, there just wouldn't be the market. Vancouver is only 2.5million metro, and we're lucky to have what we have in Europe.
Still, given that we have so many Asian destinations, plus BNE, SYD, AKL, and others like SIN coming down the pipe, I am sure MAD would be feasible. But AC would never do it.
It would have to be up to IBERIA, and I wonder if they think YVR would provide enough J class. Maybe the route development people at YVR could negotiate it. They got us Air France.
     
     
  #10516  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2016, 7:06 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
I've sometimes wondered about Madrid, too. But as jlousa said, there just wouldn't be the market. Vancouver is only 2.5million metro, and we're lucky to have what we have in Europe.
Still, given that we have so many Asian destinations, plus BNE, SYD, AKL, and others like SIN coming down the pipe, I am sure MAD would be feasible. But AC would never do it.
It would have to be up to IBERIA, and I wonder if they think YVR would provide enough J class. Maybe the route development people at YVR could negotiate it. They got us Air France.
IBERIA and BA are basically one company. While Air France and KLM are one company. If BA is sending the A380 and they think they could carry more traffic to-from Vancouver they have two choices either add another flight (using a rare slot at Heathrow) or talk nicely to their sister company in MAD.
     
     
  #10517  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2016, 7:09 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by casper View Post
IBERIA and BA are basically one company. While Air France and KLM are one company. If BA is sending the A380 and they think they could carry more traffic to-from Vancouver they have two choices either add another flight (using a rare slot at Heathrow) or talk nicely to their sister company in MAD.
That ... would be cool! Especially if they went Madrid year-round, even on an A332
     
     
  #10518  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2016, 1:32 PM
flipv's Avatar
flipv flipv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
That ... would be cool! Especially if they went Madrid year-round, even on an A332
Highly, highly unlikely. If BA needed more YVR capacity and had no appropriate LHR slot, they'd likely engage EI. Not IB which is a significant backtrack to MAD in terms of distance flown in total.

IB had YYZ/YUL plans as of two years ago. That has been shelved. YYZ-MAD is now daily year-round on AC 789/8 and that handles the demand well. Not that long ago this route was seasonal on an AC 763.
     
     
  #10519  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2016, 3:56 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipv View Post
Highly, highly unlikely. If BA needed more YVR capacity and had no appropriate LHR slot, they'd likely engage EI. Not IB which is a significant backtrack to MAD in terms of distance flown in total.

IB had YYZ/YUL plans as of two years ago. That has been shelved. YYZ-MAD is now daily year-round on AC 789/8 and that handles the demand well. Not that long ago this route was seasonal on an AC 763.
I see. pfffffffffffft. Another dream turned to dust. I think Vancouver (not counting summer seasonal) will have to make do with the "Big 4" for a long time to come, when going Transatlantic.
     
     
  #10520  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2016, 5:32 PM
Canadian74 Canadian74 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: AB/BC
Posts: 710
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
I believe Emirates was offered slots into Vancouver, but they wanted unrestricted Canada slots... which translated means they wanted daily service out of YYZ.

If the bilaterals were renegotiated, you can bet that YVR would NOT be getting much Emirates love.
They were only offered 1 or 2 weekly additional flights (not sure if YVR or YYZ), which is not very viable, especially since it has to be divided between Emirates and Etihad. There might have been a seat cap also

Imagine 1 weekly YVR-DXB
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:43 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.