Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM
One last thing I think that many people are maybe not considering is the tradeoffs we actually undertake to "solve" the problem in the short term. When it comes to any problem - certainly this one - there are no solutions, only tradeoffs. The logical outcome is either a massive tax increase or a major reduction in other services. I don't think either of those things is a tenable position to take. We need to consider what we can realistically accomplish on the public expenditure front, because these programs are massively expensive to run, and unfortunately, will leave us no further ahead if we don't correct course on some of the broader issues. Even if we can stop the bleeding, things will get a lot worse before they get any better.
|
This is a great point. Everything has a price, it's not a matter of whether or not we choose to pay that price, it's simply a question of
where we choose to pay that price. Lately, we have chosen not to pay the price in taxes, but instead in allowing our social safety net to degrade. The result, then is what we see, more visible homelessness and drug addiction.
Personal responsibility is a great sounding talking point, but it oversimplifies what is, in reality, an extremely complex set of interrelated problems. We've followed, lately, the personal responsibility model and this is where it has got us. If you like where we are, then great. If you don't like where we are, then perhaps it's time to move toward a societal responsibility model instead.