Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford
That makes no difference in the discussion. If an area is lightly populated, or empty as the moon, it doesn't change the fact that the population distribution isn't in those geographies.
LA's population distribution wouldn't change if people were forced to farm the deserts, and NJ's population distribution wouldn't change if people were forced to vacate the forests. They would both still have overwhelming population distribution in relatively narrow corridors.[/U]
|
They don't. In LA
everybody lives in one corner of the area. In NJ, the large majority live in New York and Philadelphia suburbs; yet you have like 2 million people living elsewhere in the state, occupying every single corner of it.