HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2022, 12:30 PM
Andrew_2001 Andrew_2001 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Novosibirsk
Posts: 12
Is there anything known about this?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2022, 11:33 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew_2001 View Post
Is there anything known about this?
No. If there was any update you can bet that it will be posted rather quickly.
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2022, 5:37 AM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,601
A little Railyard rumor. Supposedly the developer (still Karlin, right?) is hell bent on adding a significant hotel component to the tower closest to the convention center. In this case, significant means 1000ish rooms. Which is actually kind of blockbuster, not merely significant. It's close enough that it could be connected by a skybridge, and connect to whatever the new taller center eventually looks like.

If true, that might explain why we haven't heard anything from the developer in awhile. They're recalibrating to add a major hotel to the mix.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2022, 1:55 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
A little Railyard rumor. Supposedly the developer (still Karlin, right?) is hell bent on adding a significant hotel component to the tower closest to the convention center. In this case, significant means 1000ish rooms. Which is actually kind of blockbuster, not merely significant. It's close enough that it could be connected by a skybridge, and connect to whatever the new taller center eventually looks like.

If true, that might explain why we haven't heard anything from the developer in awhile. They're recalibrating to add a major hotel to the mix.
I keep forgetting about railyard. I have a gut feeling it will be a massive project. If only we could get something like those renders. JESUS
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2022, 7:23 PM
Maximusx1's Avatar
Maximusx1 Maximusx1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 280
Stating the obvious, but 1000 room hotel plus convention level conference rooms on a half block would have to be very tall.
Add on any type of residential component and we're talking about a monster.

However, if I were them, I'd want to start construction the same day the CC starts re-construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2022, 5:35 AM
Urbannizer's Avatar
Urbannizer Urbannizer is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX / Portland,OR / Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,002
The latest concept, more images at the link.

https://online.fliphtml5.com/dpxl/oyzb/





__________________
HAIF
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2022, 3:20 PM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
JACKinBeantown
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 9,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbannizer View Post
The latest concept, more images at the link.
The overall design is OK, but those walls on either side of the south facing windows of the taller tower will really block the peripheral views. Jeeze, they stick out about 20 feet! If I were a tenant, I'd be really unhappy about that.

I also predict kids (or drunk adults) in the pool intentionally splashing the party-goers below.
__________________
Hi.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2022, 4:57 PM
AJB AJB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 14
I absolutely love this proposed project! Great job, hopefully it comes to fruition. Its a game changer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2022, 2:25 AM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
JACKinBeantown
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 9,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by JACKinBeantown View Post
The overall design is OK, but those walls on either side of the south facing windows of the taller tower will really block the peripheral views. Jeeze, they stick out about 20 feet! If I were a tenant, I'd be really unhappy about that.

I also predict kids (or drunk adults) in the pool intentionally splashing the party-goers below.
They should do the reverse... have the window portion stick out past the concrete walls. They'd still get a version of their intended design scheme, but it would make for a much better interior experience with good views instead of blocked ones.
__________________
Hi.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2022, 1:08 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,794
Those renders are gorgeous!!! Crossing fingers we actually get something very similar irl.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2022, 5:44 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,710
Roughly 580’ and 880’

I really love the warm hues in the cladding, almost wooden in appearance, and I hope this is the next skybridge domino to fall. It’d be the first between two skyscrapers (the previous two connecting to the convention center proper), and I imagine that it will be needed because of the conference room spaces. I imagine that they aren’t shelling out for a skybridge connection to the existing convention center because the expansion plans are in flux, but wouldn’t be surprised to see this end up eventually connected via skybridge to whatever is built.

At this point, Austin is dense enough and headed in a direction where we will never lack for pedestrian activity on the ground level (the primary reason why the city had banned them), but the summer heat is going to do nothing but get worse and there does reach a tipping point where the number of pedestrians unnecessarily impacts other modes of travel. Shifting some movement of people to skybridges makes sense at this point in Austin’s development.

Apparently the developers think the land they bought is across the street from Brush Square.
__________________
Houston: 2.4m (+3.9%) + MSA suburbs: 5.4m (+12%) + CSA exurbs: 200k (+5%)
Dallas: 1.3m (+2%) / FtW: 1.0m (+10%) + suburbs: 6.4m (9%) + exurbs: 566k (+9%)
San Antonio: 1.5m (+6%) + MSA suburbs: 1.2m (+10%) + CSA exurbs: 82k (+3%)
Austin: 994k (+3%) + MSA suburbs: 1.6m (+18%)
Texas (whole): 31.29m (+7%) / Texas (balance): 8.6m (+3%)

Last edited by wwmiv; Oct 13, 2022 at 5:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2022, 1:31 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
but the summer heat is going to do nothing but get worse
I think the solution for that is more shade at ground level (trees, canopies, arcades, etc.). And getting rid of stupid setback/stepback rules intentionally trying to prevent shade.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2022, 7:02 AM
migol24 migol24 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Francisco, Austin
Posts: 1,610
These are great.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2022, 11:01 AM
bobbywest87 bobbywest87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 597
Isn’t that smaller tower where Block 16 is supposed to go?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2022, 11:52 AM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,641
This proposal is for two full blocks, 16 and 32, extending from 4th Street to 2nd Street. The second half block of the Railyard Condominiums extending west to Brazos is not included. Since we already know of 2 or 3 active proposals on those blocks, I am wondering if this was an earlier concept when the Convention Center was looking to partner with the owners of those blocks.

They label JW Marriot and the Roosevelt Room as new and the transit map does not mention Project Connect.

Last edited by H2O; Oct 13, 2022 at 11:56 AM. Reason: more evidence of old proposal
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2022, 1:35 PM
IluvATX IluvATX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Anchorage-Austin-Anchorage-Austin and so forth...
Posts: 1,606
Looks like a combination of these:


In all honesty I like the new renderings though.

Last edited by IluvATX; Oct 13, 2022 at 1:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2022, 1:52 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,601
What a wild change. Completely realigns everything we've been assuming. If Karlin really does have two full city blocks under control, I'd say the 1000 room hotel rumor suddenly is a lot more feasible than with the previous footprint. Even the podium seems built up enough to suggest meeting space/ballrooms.

And if this is a new concept (not from a year or so ago, as H2O guessed), then it's also suggesting the shape of the new CC. Check the pic below from the flipbook. They're not only showing the Railyard, they're also showing a completely flipped and reconfigured CC alignment. In this pic, the CC goes east-west, not north-south between Trinity and Red River, and 3rd and 4th; there are ghost renderings on the current CC land along Cesar Chavez; there's a re-established street grid, and a paseo under the Railyard (rather than the CC) at 3rd; there's an expansion of Palm Park on two city blocks going east; and that park view is NOT from Brush Square, but from that new portion of Palm Park. And there's even a separate ghost tower attached to that new CC building, across from the Hilton.

I think I'm actually talking myself into the idea that Karlin is partnering with the CC to be part of its expansion.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2022, 2:54 PM
paul78701 paul78701 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,236
My guess is that this is an old concept. As this rendering suggests that projects we already know about aren't happening.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2022, 6:19 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
I'd love this tall gray building on the left. It reminds me of that pyramid tower from back in the Aughts for the MACC site.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2022, 2:52 PM
bobbywest87 bobbywest87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 597
If both this and waterline get built we'll have two giant boots in our skyline. Nothin' more Texas than that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.