HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2017, 3:20 PM
TBone7281 TBone7281 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 686
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschaton View Post

Latest "master plan"

I never expected this to become reality. But still.

Sigh.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2017, 4:40 PM
deja vu's Avatar
deja vu deja vu is offline
somewhere in-between
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Zoo, Michigan
Posts: 3,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschaton View Post

Latest "master plan"

Man, this is so disappointing, but I will not lose hope yet. The fact that they are proposing to start work furthest from the triangle at least means that things could still evolve towards the west side of the site, and we might end up with more density towards the downtown side if the market improves. But I agree with the sentiment of others - leave it all empty until it can be done better / right.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2017, 4:25 PM
BenM BenM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 95


So is McCormack Baron Salazar now in charge of the overall development plan?

If so, that would be disappointing. Their previous work on The Hill, (Crawford Roberts and the recent Skyline Terrace) is not offensive, but really boring.

Maybe they will surprise me. But history suggests not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2017, 3:51 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Our public authorities have completed their new sweetheart deal for the Penguins, thereby officially taking ownership of this debacle:

http://www.post-gazette.com/business...s/201712060074

Meanwhile:

Quote:
Mr. Williams said the Penguins are ready to roll. “We are turning the page and are ready to move forward on the next stage of development,” he said. That will start Wednesday evening when the team and St. Louis-based developer McCormack Baron Salazar host a design workshop and charrette involving the first 250 of the 1,000 residential units to be built at the site near Crawford Square. . . .

The current plan calls for McCormack Baron to build the first 250 apartments units in a four- to five-story building. The KBK team will follow with another 250 units in a similarly sized building on an adjacent parcel in the second phase. Another 500 units will be developed by McCormack Baron on the upper part of the site abutting Crawford Street and Bedford Avenue in the third phase.
Raise your hand if you think this will end up looking anything like the cool, innovative BIG plan, versus the generic developments on the same scale we have seen lately across the City.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2017, 4:35 PM
pj3000's Avatar
pj3000 pj3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pittsburgh & Miami
Posts: 7,831
^ There is no possibility of restoring that building. It could certainly be improved, but it is structurally altered to an extent that it could not be restored to its original appearance without basically demoing it and rebuilding it. Probably 80% of it is not original anyway. It's a lost cause and would be best leveled.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2017, 4:55 AM
AaronPGH's Avatar
AaronPGH AaronPGH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PGH
Posts: 1,802
I actually kinda like that remuddled building. With some love, it could give me Mexico City vibes. lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2017, 5:31 AM
pj3000's Avatar
pj3000 pj3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pittsburgh & Miami
Posts: 7,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronPGH View Post
I actually kinda like that remuddled building. With some love, it could give me Mexico City vibes. lol
Aside from the fact that those balconies are most likely total death traps, there's nothing that a new coat of paint can't fix.

It could be a tremendous party pad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2017, 2:14 PM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is online now
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh n’ at
Posts: 16,352
^
So it's just going to be another generic development with more than likely crap cheap architecture.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2017, 3:03 PM
AaronPGH's Avatar
AaronPGH AaronPGH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PGH
Posts: 1,802
What was the point of all of these designs by BIG and AE7 if they were just going to get tossed into the trash? Who was even behind getting those put together?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2017, 3:08 PM
eschaton eschaton is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,522
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronPGH View Post
What was the point of all of these designs by BIG and AE7 if they were just going to get tossed into the trash? Who was even behind getting those put together?
It looks like McCormack Baron Salazar hired BIG at least directly, so it's not like the City or URA paid for those master plans to go forward.

My guess is it was all conceptual fluff to make people go "Ooh! Ahh!" and let the Penguins do whatever they wanted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2017, 5:29 PM
Minivan Werner Minivan Werner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 498
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronPGH View Post
What was the point of all of these designs by BIG and AE7 if they were just going to get tossed into the trash? Who was even behind getting those put together?
Free advertising for BIG and the illusion that something was actually happening for the Penguins.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2017, 2:32 PM
themaguffin themaguffin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,307
The idea of the Pens being involved was terrible from day one and continues to be so.

I would rather the site remain a blank slate until this prime land is utilized appropriately.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2017, 11:25 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronPGH View Post
What was the point of all of these designs by BIG and AE7 if they were just going to get tossed into the trash? Who was even behind getting those put together?
I would suggest they were about buying the Penguins time and good will, and are no longer relevant now that they got their new deal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2017, 3:22 PM
bmust71 bmust71 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 229
Civic Arena site is going to look horrible... are those surface lots in the master plan?? Shame. Bet there won't be one building on that site > 8 stories
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2017, 3:28 PM
eschaton eschaton is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,522
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmust71 View Post
Civic Arena site is going to look horrible... are those surface lots in the master plan?? Shame. Bet there won't be one building on that site > 8 stories
The original master plan (which they are cribbing off of it seems, throwing out the BIG and AE7 plans entirely) had no surface lots. What you see are two parking garages.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2017, 5:03 PM
pj3000's Avatar
pj3000 pj3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pittsburgh & Miami
Posts: 7,831
Seems that there are too many inhibiting forces (the Penguins, Hill District community groups, a city administration that's way too close to both of them, and the simple lack of high demand for large-scale market rate/luxury residential and commercial space in Pittsburgh) at play at the Civic Arena site for it to be developed in a high-quality, top-tier manner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2017, 11:27 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj3000 View Post
Seems that there are too many inhibiting forces (the Penguins, Hill District community groups, a city administration that's way too close to both of them, and the simple lack of high demand for large-scale market rate/luxury residential and commercial space in Pittsburgh) at play at the Civic Arena site for it to be developed in a high-quality, top-tier manner.
I'd take my chances on demand by bidding out the parcels.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2017, 1:22 AM
pj3000's Avatar
pj3000 pj3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pittsburgh & Miami
Posts: 7,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
I'd take my chances on demand by bidding out the parcels.
Good point. That's the way it should be, right?

This whole Penguins arrangement is such bs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2017, 6:20 PM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
Eurosceptic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 24,332
Agreed... no more "open space"!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2017, 6:28 PM
Don't Be That Guy Don't Be That Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evergrey View Post
Agreed... no more "open space"!
Amen. I am under no illusion that the BIG plan was going to ever happen - I don't even particularly like it. But all of these passive open spaces and townhouses only five blocks from the second tallest buildings in the state is just ridiculous. Build townhouses and mid-rises as infill in the neighborhoods, not immediately adjacent to downtown. Build the cap over 579 and then encourage Golden Triangle levels of density.

This is just another example of "doing something" for the political optics of it rather than doing the hard work or waiting for the best option in the long run.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:18 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.