HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2021, 12:37 AM
wanderer34 wanderer34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Miami/somewhere in paradise
Posts: 1,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by begratto View Post
Actually, Montreal is currently building a 67km (42mi) light metro line, the REM (Réseau Express Métropolitain - or Express Metropolitan Network).

Basically it's similar to a subway, but with shorter trains - 80 meters long. It will open in phases between 2022 and 2024. At opening time, there will be a train every 150 seconds at rush hour, every 5 minutes the rest of the day.

The pink line will not be built as it was originally proposed, but a REM phase 2 (REM de l'Est - or Eastern REM) is planned for the same areas - the eastern part of Montreal's island. This will add another 32km (20mi) to the network.

There are are serious talks about adding additional phases in Laval (north of Montreal) and in the Longueuil-Brossard axis, on the south shore of the St. Lawrence river.
I always felt that the pink line would've been better as a heavy rail line as opposed to being light rail, but the REM to places such as Laval and Dorval seems interesting. Is it going to be run by METRO??? Either way, I still envy major cities mass transit cities and their penchant for expanding them in comparison to Philadelphia.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2021, 12:53 AM
wanderer34 wanderer34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Miami/somewhere in paradise
Posts: 1,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skintreesnail View Post
I do think though that light rail down Delaware ave. makes a lot of sense, particularly because there are a lot of projects in the works along the river that will introduce demand as well as overcrowding on the nearby MFL. It would be easy to merge the route into the existing Girard trolley route where there is a loop already at Laurel and Delaware ave, or further up where Delaware ave becomes Richmond and already has tracks running down it. I don't think it should be center-running though, either the outermost lane of each side should be dedicated to light rail, or something like Toronto does along the lake, which would limit interaction with traffic even more: https://www.google.com/maps/@43.6396...!5m1!1e2?hl=en
If there was a light rail extension towards Delaware Ave, then I would've expanded it between Lehigh Ave and Spring Garden. There's already a trolley spur between Girard Ave and Delaware Ave serving the casino. And at one point in time, prior to the 2008 recession, there were supposed to be several condo projects that was supposed to take place along the Delaware waterfront (the rest of Waterfront Sq, Bridgeman's View, Trump Tower Philadelphia, Penn's Point, and the Greater Philadelphia World Trade Center). As usual, all those projects bit the dust during there 2008 recession.

If this economy heats up again, I could see similar projects coming to fruition. Maybe then a light rail project between Spring Garden and Lehigh would make a lot of sense. If I was running SEPTA, I'd work on creating more subway lines within the city and the immediate area over creating a river line which I wouldn't be sure whether it would be utilized. The secret is connectivity and it's highly important that such a line is connected to the subway/el system.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Skintreesnail View Post
I think BSL/CHW conversion was actually a proposal at some point. $$ of course, but at the very least it should be taken off the NEC and tie into the main SEPTA RR trunk, which would be a lot cheaper since it's running right next to it at the Allegheny stop on the Norristown line.
I've always felt that the CHE/CHW should tie into the NOR line and create it's own line from North Phila station to CC via a subway line underneath the Reading Viaduct and 9th St. Connecting the CHE/CHW/NOR lines to the Orange Line may overload the BSL, so it's necessary to just create another subway line between North Phila and CC, with two local tracks, and another two lower express tracks. Once again, the powers that be in the city and state had bungled another opportunity to expand our promising subway system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2021, 1:58 AM
Broadstrexpresstrain Broadstrexpresstrain is offline
broadstrexpresstrain
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5
Deleware Avenue EL


I love to see that there is now potentially development planned along the river....once it starts .....there will be a waterfall of high rise projects along the river....( so long as covid is conquered)

This discussion about rail is interesting....you all do know that there use to be an El along delaware Ave that was demolished in the 60’s ....see these links below

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7m7JDeHsOk

http://phillyandstuff.blogspot.com/2...ilway.html?m=1

When discussing subways in Philly why do people always say that there are only 2 lines. In other cities any rail that travels underground is considered a subway, even if the vast majority of the route is at grade ( on the ground) examples being Washington, Atlanta, San Francisco, Dallas, Portland, Pittsburgh and Buffalo. If the rule of having rail run underground works as a definition for subway in other cities, then why doesn't that same rule work for Philadelphia. Transit enthusiasts always say that Philly has 2 or 3 lines But I contend that by using the definition of subway that other cities follow, Philly has 6 lines. Philly has a subway that runs below broad Street, Market Street, Ridge Ave (this is a spur from the broad street line- however in other cities spurs are considered seperate lines- in DC the green and yellow line travel the same route for the majority of the route and deviate or spur at the ends of the line only- the same can be said for the orange and blue lines in DC). Philly also has a line at walnut street (also called the Patco line from New Jersey). Philly has the Arch street lines these are the multiple cummuter lines that go underground downtown serving 3 stations downtown). Philly also has the subway surface trolley lines- 5 seperate routes in total that travel below maket street downtown but travel below pine street in West Philadlphia. Also, the subway surface trolley lines deviate into seperate tunnels in west philadelphia creating spurs. I do not know he other street (other than Pine street that the subway travels below in West philly.

So using this definition of subway lines (recognized and used by other cities) Transit enthusiast should agree that Philly has 6 lines total - 1) Broad St. 2) Market St. 3) walnut st. 4) Ridge ave 5) Arch St. 6) Pine St. In other cities (washington and Atlanta) you have seperate routes traveling in the same tunnel and deviating at the end of the line creating (in their definition) seperate distinct subway lines. If this rule/ definition Of seperate distinct subway lines followed in other cities, was also applied in philly then the subway surface lines would all be considered 5 seperate distinct subway lines and the Arch street line should also be considered 15 seperate distinct subway lines....Sadly, we all know that the rule and definitions of what is and what is not considerate a seperate distinct subway line (while it works in most other cites outside of NY, Chicaga and Boston) do not work for Philly in the eyes of transit enthusiast.

Also, when other cities ( excluding New York, Chicago and Boston) count lines they count all lines combined city and cummuter -suburban lines. When using that line counting method, Philly could identify 20 lines.

As a native Philadelphian I think that most native Philadelphians, Bostonians, New Yorkers and Chicagoans assume that a subway/ El is considered such if the entire route ( or majority) is either buried In a tunnel or travels on a bridge directly above a street, Whereas people from other cities define a subway simply if any of the line (even if it's not the majority of the route ) travels below ground.
As I have always said, Philly is like Rodney Dangetfield's famous statement, "I gets no respect."

BSET

https://youtu.be/kw5VkI2JAqM

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bB8Bby_sNGU
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2021, 4:56 PM
begratto's Avatar
begratto begratto is offline
Explorateur urbain
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Verdun > Montréal > Québec > Canada
Posts: 1,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanderer34 View Post
I always felt that the pink line would've been better as a heavy rail line as opposed to being light rail, but the REM to places such as Laval and Dorval seems interesting. Is it going to be run by METRO??? Either way, I still envy major cities mass transit cities and their penchant for expanding them in comparison to Philadelphia.
The REM is a light metro, not really light rail as you know it in the USA. The rolling stock will be the same as what is use in Sydney, and they call it a metro. It's basically the same as a heavy rail line ; the only difference is that trains will consist of 4 cars instead of 6 or more (as in Sydney). The trains will be shorter, but the frequency is better.

The REM will be run by the CDPQ-infra (Quebec's pension fund), but fares will be fully integrated with other transit agencies (exo, STL, RTL, STM), so there will be no extra charges to take the REM.
__________________
Venit ad oppidum!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2021, 6:09 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEFTA View Post
I really love this project.
I believe it to be in good hands with Pelli. They have an attention to detail.
A 700fter on the waterfront would be crazy good.
A new park and landscaped waterfront promenade.
This will be a bustling area full of residents and tourists.
Imagine if all these proposals were to be built! (in red)

Penn's Landing Redevelopment -Durst Organization -Pelli Clark Pelli, Bjarke Ingels Group, and Hargreaves Jones 9-11-20 c
If those are your models, what program did you use to make them with? The red ones.
__________________
Nevermore
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2021, 9:40 PM
El Duderino's Avatar
El Duderino El Duderino is offline
build awesome buildings
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 616
i meant to mention this last week, but i was walking by the southern (BIG) portion of the site...and it certainly looked like they were doing soil samples or some sort of major exploratory drilling in the middle of the parking lot. the entire Market St parcel is being used for staging for the Delaware River Trail updates (which look great) so it’s tough to tell if similar things are happening there, but it would be pretty great to see this start showing further signs of momentum.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2021, 5:41 AM
SEFTA's Avatar
SEFTA SEFTA is offline
Philly Pholly
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas View Post
If those are your models, what program did you use to make them with? The red ones.
I used SketchUp it's a free program. I have an old version, SketchUp Make 2017. It's a little clunky.
I don't think the newer versions even have the option to upload it onto GoogleEarth.

I'm kind of obsessed with it though.
It's pretty cool in that it let's you manipulate the view as if they existed in the scene.

I create my own Future Philadelphia.

Take a look.
It's just for fun.
https://www.facebook.com/PhillyPholly/

My 1000 ftr at 8th and Market! Overbuild of Convention Center
East Market Street

East Market Street 2

The red ones are proposals over the years
the blue ones are under construction (except for Jewelers Row )

__________________
Smart Cities

Last edited by SEFTA; Mar 16, 2021 at 6:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2021, 2:47 PM
mcgrath618's Avatar
mcgrath618 mcgrath618 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Clark Park, Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,749
From the Lowrise Thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
Penn’s Landing: Updated Park Design













Read/view more here:
https://www.parkatpennslanding.com/n...NQQARtofaZ0z00
Note that this is just the park. Durst's plans for this site (as pictured in the OP) have not changed.
__________________
Philadelphia Transportation Thread: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=164129
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2021, 5:14 PM
arkitect13 arkitect13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 388
Any idea as to when dursts project will start? I think it was sometime during the parks construction but don't remember when
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2021, 5:34 PM
Urbanthusiat's Avatar
Urbanthusiat Urbanthusiat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: South Philly
Posts: 1,706
Quote:
Originally Posted by arkitect13 View Post
Any idea as to when dursts project will start? I think it was sometime during the parks construction but don't remember when
It's a ways off. I wouldn't expect to see a shovel in the ground for two years minimum. This is a really complicated site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2021, 7:39 PM
TK2001's Avatar
TK2001 TK2001 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Not your business
Posts: 2,663
I completely expected the buildings to get downgraded. I'm not mad to be honest, but slightly disappointed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2021, 8:05 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by TK2001 View Post
I completely expected the buildings to get downgraded. I'm not mad to be honest, but slightly disappointed
Huh? Nothing has happened to the buildings. Those renderings are for the Penn's Landing park ONLY. Those building massings/renderings have been like that from the DRWC since before Durst was brought on board. Nothing has changed from Durst. Not saying it won't, but those are not officially renderings of their planned buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2021, 8:12 PM
SEFTA's Avatar
SEFTA SEFTA is offline
Philly Pholly
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,286
Penn's Landing Rendering 10-15-21 small

Penn's Landing -Durst 10-15-21

Love THIS!

I'm surprised they put a grove above the freeway.
That's a lot o dirt!
I'm also surprised they dropped such a big building in the middle
and not a very exciting one at that.
__________________
Smart Cities
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2021, 12:14 AM
mcgrath618's Avatar
mcgrath618 mcgrath618 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Clark Park, Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,749
Everyone: as I said in my post, the Durst project has not been changed in any way. We are still getting a 700'er.

TK, please do not put out a PhillyYIMBY article saying they have been. This rendering from the city is only meant to concern the park overbuild itself. The buildings in the background are placeholder and have no bearing on Durst's actual plans (which again, I must emphasize, have not yet changed).
__________________
Philadelphia Transportation Thread: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=164129
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2021, 1:07 AM
SEFTA's Avatar
SEFTA SEFTA is offline
Philly Pholly
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,286
The Seaport Museum is crying out to be replaced.
Sell that premier lot and move the museum into one of the massive piers to the north.
This lot deserves a signature building
__________________
Smart Cities
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2021, 11:55 AM
ScreamShatter ScreamShatter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 2,069
^ Agreed.

Separate but related, are there any proposals for festival pier yet? While I don’t think a 700 ft will happen there, it’s a lot that can handle some height given the closeness to El.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2021, 10:26 PM
El Duderino's Avatar
El Duderino El Duderino is offline
build awesome buildings
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 616
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamShatter View Post
^ Agreed.

Separate but related, are there any proposals for festival pier yet? While I don’t think a 700 ft will happen there, it’s a lot that can handle some height given the closeness to El.
sadly, we’ll be looking at something closer to 70 ft: https://www.phila.gov/media/20200805...Submission.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2021, 11:58 PM
iheartphilly's Avatar
iheartphilly iheartphilly is offline
Philly Rising Up!
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: motherEarth
Posts: 3,263
^
That's fine for the festival pier. Good low slung building. If built like the renders, it looks high quality and very good density. Win-Win.

BUT, for any proposed buildings next to the yet to be constructed Penn's Landing park, I think any developer would be out of his mind not to go big. At least 500 foot since the park if excuted will all the features as shown in the render will be the impetus for developers to invest there. It's like when you got a great park and your are next to the river, it's a no brainer to go big or go home, as the saying goes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2021, 2:49 AM
SEFTA's Avatar
SEFTA SEFTA is offline
Philly Pholly
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,286
An extraordinarily ordinary proposal for such an extraordinary site.
the potential of this site going untapped
unimaginative
nothing says waterfront
this would be great..
a few blocks to the west
NOT ON THE WATERFRONT!
MAJOR TRANSIT!
Not even green roofs
a sickly little path allotted for waterfront public space
all the quirky little gestures
seating on the inside courtyard not even acknowledging that IT'S SITTING ON THE WATER!
I just hope it's not another opportunity lost
SOMEBODY HAS A COMPLETE LACK OF IMAGINATION!


501 N Christopher Columbus Boulevard 10-16-21 e

501 N Christopher Columbus Boulevard 10-16-21 d

501 N Christopher Columbus Boulevard 10-16-21 c

501 N Christopher Columbus Boulevard 10-16-21 b by
__________________
Smart Cities

Last edited by SEFTA; Oct 17, 2021 at 3:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2021, 3:37 AM
arkitect13 arkitect13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 388
^ I actually disagree, its a handsome, pedestrian friendly, proposal. I do wish there was a green roof, and that it was at least 100ft taller, but this is better then nothing right? Its good looking, dense, pedestrian friendly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:12 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.