HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9801  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2025, 5:58 PM
cjones2451's Avatar
cjones2451 cjones2451 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Port Moody, BC
Posts: 818
Olympic Stadium

Looks like they are making good progress on the new technical ring

Lots of Photos here

https://toiture.parcolympique.qc.ca/...alerie-photos/



Judging by he back ground in some of the photos, looks like seats need replacing too

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9802  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2025, 6:53 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonny24 View Post
I suspect that if such a league were to happen, it would most likely be involving the current tennants - i.e. a London Knights Senior team.
I'm thinking the only way for this to happen would be the talk of a big TV contract and lots of rich guys who can't get into the NHL.

I don't see it like a CEBL or CPL where the clubs start small and hope to grow, I see it more like a WHA, big from the beginning but without the competition against the NHL element.

Perhaps something resembling the old WHL which likely spurred the NHL expansion of 1967
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9803  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2025, 7:25 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjones2451 View Post
Looks like they are making good progress on the new technical ring. Lots of Photos here

Judging by he back ground in some of the photos, looks like seats need replacing too
I've been following this fairly closely, not sure why I thought they wouldn't be starting the new technical ring now.

Look at the difference between the old and new technical ring, the weight saving must be incredible.

AFAIK there has been no official announcement of any interior changes to the building and to realistically make it viable for any team to play there would be along the lines of the Blue Jays or Hamilton arena renovations.

In my opinion to replace those seats when they are still so far from the action is ludicrous as would be the cost, although sooner or later they will have to bite that bullet.

In 2013, Edmonton replaced their 56k seats to the tune of almost $12 million
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9804  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2025, 7:59 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,573
Lansdowne 2.0 has lost it's most successful tenant. They'll leave Lansdowne once the old Civic Centre comes down.

PWHL To Ottawa: "We Will Not Play At Lansdowne 2.0"[/SIZE]

Ian Kennedy, Hockey News
November 18, 2025


https://thehockeynews.com/womens/pwh...L-l9o8rbd7I4Gw
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9805  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2025, 8:16 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quite a bit of hubris coming from a team barely two years old that plays a 15 game home schedule. Frankly fatigued from the politics and drama of women's sports. I supported them when they were being derided and now they expect the world.

Let's see what playing in a 2/3 empty arena does for ticket scarcity when people realize they can get a ticket anytime (or not)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9806  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2025, 4:20 AM
northernlights99 northernlights99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 153
looks like those blue seats have been smashed, was there debris falling ?

well as long as everything is ready for 2027 for an Outdoor hockey game or a Grey Cup.

Or... well you know.

They really don't need the covering that bad, they can play some events for a year or so with the technical ring in place and the roof in a solid position.

One seat in the upper level is painted yellow to recognize a home run hit by Willie Stargell, the longest home run ever hit in the stadium.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9807  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2025, 1:14 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by elly63 View Post
Quite a bit of hubris coming from a team barely two years old that plays a 15 game home schedule. Frankly fatigued from the politics and drama of women's sports. I supported them when they were being derided and now they expect the world.

Let's see what playing in a 2/3 empty arena does for ticket scarcity when people realize they can get a ticket anytime (or not)
The Mayor, Council and OSEG disrespected them. They were willing players in the politics.

If it were up to me, I'd have the Charge hold their nose for 5 years and play at Lansdowne (3 years at the Civic Centre, 2 years at the smaller arena) to see how things go and how attendance shifts. Maybe add a clause to the contract that if the last year at the Civic Centre proves to maintain a strong attendance, they can get out with minimal or no penalty.

Playing in Kanata is certainly not ideal, but the National Lacrosse Black Bears seem to be doing quite well (seats limited to 7k, averaging above 5k). Maybe the PWHL could do well even in a less than ideal location. A more transit accessible building at the Flats eventually might drive attendance up.

We all have our biases. Pro Lansdowne folks think the PWHL's attendance will go down, those who oppose the smaller arena think the attendance is likely to go up. Time will tell.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9808  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2025, 4:19 PM
jonny24 jonny24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Caledonia, often in Hamilton and Norfolk
Posts: 1,669
I got to attend the "tester" event at TD Coliseum last night - Earth Wind and Fire put on a show for all the companies that worked on the building.

I forgot to take pictures in the concourses.

Outside looks spiffy with the new dark paint. This continues through the building- pretty much everything is painted black / dark grey, with gold used as an accent colour on signage, etc.

There's now a new concourse level that's at street level from Bay St. - you no longer have to immediately go up those escalators.

Nearly all the food+beverage are the new self-serve style, where you grab what you want and pay at a self checkout kiosk. (Still asks for a tip, though!). It was a little awkward compared to the only other time I've seen these (Pittsburgh), because they ID you on the way in and then stop you to make sure you've opened your drinks on the way out.

Beer selection was interesting - Peroni is the headliner, with one area called the Peroni Club, the only other options I came across were Grolsch and Asahi Super Dry.

LOTS of different food options. Some areas are themed (Matty's Burgers, Casa Escobar tacos, Dip sandwiches) and then more generic stadium fare in the self serve areas. I had some fried chicken tenders that were pretty good, the same counter had buffalo chicken, poutine, etc.

The new clubs/suites/loges around the top of the bowl fit in quite well, they look like they were meant to be there from the start. The ice-level club area in interesting, the clubs were open to the bowl with the concert seating arrangement but those seats would be absolutely terrible for hockey. There must be different temp seating for hockey that is stored elsewhere. (lower left of first photo).

Looking East (towards Library)



South Side (Jackson Square) Suites:



North Side Loges (York Blvd):



West End (Bay St) "Centre Club":



New Rigging framing and reinforced roof trusses - the frame for the scoreboard is buried in there, but there's no screens mounted yet.



And a shot of the concert, for good measure:

__________________
Mods: Don't delete my posts without explaining why. I broke no rules. I wasn't inappropriate.

Don't ruin what is a good forum.

Last edited by jonny24; Nov 19, 2025 at 7:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9809  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2025, 6:16 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,573
Photos didn't post unfortunately. You'd have to run them through https://imgur.com/ or https://postimages.org/. I sometimes post things on https://skyrisecities.com/forum/ first, if you have an account there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9810  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2025, 6:35 PM
jonny24 jonny24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Caledonia, often in Hamilton and Norfolk
Posts: 1,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Photos didn't post unfortunately. You'd have to run them through https://imgur.com/ or https://postimages.org/. I sometimes post things on https://skyrisecities.com/forum/ first, if you have an account there.
Oh, that's odd, thanks for letting my know. I recently switched to OneDrive instead of Google Photos and haven't got the hang of it apparently.
__________________
Mods: Don't delete my posts without explaining why. I broke no rules. I wasn't inappropriate.

Don't ruin what is a good forum.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9811  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2025, 8:17 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonny24 View Post
Oh, that's odd, thanks for letting my know. I recently switched to OneDrive instead of Google Photos and haven't got the hang of it apparently.
I see them now, thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9812  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2025, 8:25 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,573
As were counting down to the demolition of the old 1967 vintage Civic Centre in Ottawa because it's apparently beyond any renovations that could permanently fix the roof or upgrade the accessibility to near modern standards, I'm wondering about the Coca-Cola Coliseum (1921) and Pacific Coliseum (1968). How were your respective cities able to upgrade those venues?

Obviously, the Civic Centre has a unique design that might make upgrades a little more challenging, though I'm sure a building from the 20s has unique challenges as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9813  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2025, 9:46 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,731
Lol my buddy that went to this same concert is in your photos. Never seen someone I know in photos on this board before!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9814  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2025, 9:48 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
We all have our biases. Pro Lansdowne folks think the PWHL's attendance will go down, those who oppose the smaller arena think the attendance is likely to go up. Time will tell.
It's not about being pro or contra Lansdowne, it's whether the present (IMO) socially engineered popularity of women's pro league sports is lasting or not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9815  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2025, 12:49 AM
AuxTown's Avatar
AuxTown AuxTown is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 4,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by elly63 View Post
It's not about being pro or contra Lansdowne, it's whether the present (IMO) socially engineered popularity of women's pro league sports is lasting or not.
I don't see what the problem is. If they think the PWHL popularity is going to grow so much then it will definitely outgrow even a 10000 seat rink. In that case, they can play at the new facility at Lebreton in 5 years. Otherwise, if demand stays the same or drops then the 5000 building will be a perfect size for their crowds. And to suggest they need their own locker room facilities but don't want to pay for them is ridiculous. They don't need to chip in for the building.....taxpayers get the bill.....but they can make all of these demands! I had a great time at both 67s and Charge games but it is nowhere near the quality of NHL hockey and I'll gladly take my money there if/when they leave town.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9816  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2025, 1:06 AM
northernlights99 northernlights99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 153
No roof is planned to cover the north side stands, the seating capacity will be reduced by 2000, lack of a roof is a turn off to whatever football fans in Ottawa are still left, a roof would be important by playoff time, nothing really exciting about this
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9817  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2025, 4:54 AM
elly63 elly63 is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by AuxTown View Post
I don't see what the problem is. If they think the PWHL popularity is going to grow so much then it will definitely outgrow even a 10000 seat rink. In that case, they can play at the new facility at Lebreton in 5 years. Otherwise, if demand stays the same or drops then the 5000 building will be a perfect size for their crowds. And to suggest they need their own locker room facilities but don't want to pay for them is ridiculous. They don't need to chip in for the building.....taxpayers get the bill.....but they can make all of these demands! I had a great time at both 67s and Charge games but it is nowhere near the quality of NHL hockey and I'll gladly take my money there if/when they leave town.
Agreed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9818  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2025, 1:44 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by northernlights99 View Post
No roof is planned to cover the north side stands, the seating capacity will be reduced by 2000, lack of a roof is a turn off to whatever football fans in Ottawa are still left, a roof would be important by playoff time, nothing really exciting about this
Part of the Mayor's "fairness campaign". Gotta make both sides suck!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9819  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2025, 5:45 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 25,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by northernlights99 View Post
No roof is planned to cover the north side stands, the seating capacity will be reduced by 2000, lack of a roof is a turn off to whatever football fans in Ottawa are still left, a roof would be important by playoff time, nothing really exciting about this
Nothing really exciting is putting it mildly. It will be a third rate facility.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9820  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2025, 7:21 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
Nothing really exciting is putting it mildly. It will be a third rate facility.
Don't be ridiculous
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:17 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.