Quote:
Originally Posted by jmecklenborg
For whatever reason, this book is not well-known, despite the fact that the author is still alive and in fact just gave a talk in my city back in April that unfortunately I was not able to attend.
|
Also, the book made a very strong argument, way back in 1986, that the anomalous character of postwar U.S. cities was primarily the history of mortgage lending -
not the interstate highways, not the lack of public transportation, not the invention of the hi-rise downtown office building, and definitely not single-family home zoning.
We saw everything change in every U.S. city - large and small - when the banks stopped lending speculatively for suburban SFH subdivisions and condo complexes after the 2008 nuclear meltdown. Previously, the banks lent money like candy to developers who built many more homes and apartment/condo units that cities typically needed. That's how we ended up with urban decay even as metro area populations grew.
When that practice ended, it took a few years, but around 2015 the excess housing built ten years prior was absorbed by the growing population. The unwillingness to lend for large-scale greenfield development meant a de facto growth boundary now ringed every U.S. city. Enter the house flippers and infill developments in forgotten city neighborhoods.