HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #961  
Old Posted May 21, 2011, 6:55 PM
Joshy Joshy is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
the moose will likely be heading to Saskatchewan......they will be close to winnipeg at any rate.
It's been officially announced that the Moose are moving to St. John's.

http://www.thetelegram.com/News/Loca...for-St-Johns/1
     
     
  #962  
Old Posted May 21, 2011, 7:40 PM
CorbeauNoir's Avatar
CorbeauNoir CorbeauNoir is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrJoe View Post
Sorry if this has been asked already but what is going on with the MTS Centre? Even at 100% capacity Winnipeg would have ranked 24th in attendance this year.

Maybe they intend on gouging people to make up the difference but long term how sustainable is that?
-Raw attendance is an overrated stat, what's more important is how much money you're making per seat. 15000 people all paying for their tickets/food/beer/merch is always going to be better than 18000 people with half of them attending with giveaway tickets and concession discounts.
-Expanding the MTS makes little financial sense. It would severely disrupt any team/event at the arena (I can't possibly imagine such a massive expansion being completed during the offseason being feasable). They'd be the cheapest seats in the house, so even if they did pop the roof and add extra seats the cost of constructing and maintaining that extra seating isn't going to be compensated by the earnings from those seats - certainly not to any degree that would make it worthwhile
-TNSE have abundant sources of alternate revenue at their disposal. Even without an NHL team MTS is a very busy arena, and the developing entertainment district downtown will be feeding off an NHL tennant. A Winnipeg team would not be operating in an economic vacuum, there are strategies in place that compensate for the lack of a few thousand cheap seats.

Both TNSE and the NHL have repeatedly stated that the arena is perfectly fine for NHL hockey - if they didn't there'd be no chance of a team returning to Manitoba in the first place. Nobody is looking for Winnipeg to become a pseudo-Maple Leafs economic juggernaut for the NHL (though I've seen cynics draft up seating price charts that if actually implemented would easily surpass Toronto's per-game attendance revenue). A team in Winnipeg would offer middle-of-the-road stability and trustworthy, reliable owners who actually know what they're doing - which is exactly what the NHL needs in the wake of these franchise crises.
     
     
  #963  
Old Posted May 21, 2011, 7:56 PM
reidjr reidjr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorbeauNoir View Post
-Raw attendance is an overrated stat, what's more important is how much money you're making per seat. 15000 people all paying for their tickets/food/beer/merch is always going to be better than 18000 people with half of them attending with giveaway tickets and concession discounts.
-Expanding the MTS makes little financial sense. It would severely disrupt any team/event at the arena (I can't possibly imagine such a massive expansion being completed during the offseason being feasable). They'd be the cheapest seats in the house, so even if they did pop the roof and add extra seats the cost of constructing and maintaining that extra seating isn't going to be compensated by the earnings from those seats - certainly not to any degree that would make it worthwhile
-TNSE have abundant sources of alternate revenue at their disposal. Even without an NHL team MTS is a very busy arena, and the developing entertainment district downtown will be feeding off an NHL tennant. A Winnipeg team would not be operating in an economic vacuum, there are strategies in place that compensate for the lack of a few thousand cheap seats.

Both TNSE and the NHL have repeatedly stated that the arena is perfectly fine for NHL hockey - if they didn't there'd be no chance of a team returning to Manitoba in the first place. Nobody is looking for Winnipeg to become a pseudo-Maple Leafs economic juggernaut for the NHL (though I've seen cynics draft up seating price charts that if actually implemented would easily surpass Toronto's per-game attendance revenue). A team in Winnipeg would offer middle-of-the-road stability and trustworthy, reliable owners who actually know what they're doing - which is exactly what the NHL needs in the wake of these franchise crises.
The key for winnipeg is to limit cheap tickets and give aways and if they do that they will be just fine.
     
     
  #964  
Old Posted May 21, 2011, 7:59 PM
CorbeauNoir's Avatar
CorbeauNoir CorbeauNoir is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by reidjr View Post
The key for winnipeg is to limit cheap tickets and give aways and if they do that they will be just fine.
Exactly. There's certainly a little bit less room for error than there might be in larger cities, but success or failure of a new team in Winnipeg isn't going to hinge on the existence of 2000 nosebleed seats.
     
     
  #965  
Old Posted May 21, 2011, 8:25 PM
roccerfeller's Avatar
roccerfeller roccerfeller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 2,923
re: financial discussion, yeah freeweed posted a nice comparison of how even at Moose AHL prices, they'd still be making more money (when looking solely at tickets)



People can mark this post, but in a year I think how much money Winnipeg's NHL team makes will surprise people.

Likely, it will be 4th in revenue out of the (soon to be) 7 Canadian teams, and not just for the first year (yes, ahead of Cal, Edm, Ott)

Why? because people are really looking way too much into attendance numbers.

Don't focus on the small picture.

This ownership group, TNSE, is key. Wouldn't be possible without them. They have a huge business plan.
     
     
  #966  
Old Posted May 21, 2011, 8:47 PM
PoscStudent's Avatar
PoscStudent PoscStudent is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: St. John's
Posts: 3,775
The Winnipeg Jets and the St. John's Jets.
     
     
  #967  
Old Posted May 21, 2011, 9:28 PM
ZeDgE ZeDgE is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,201
Is this for sure yet? If so congrats to Winnipeg! I can see the standing ovations at each Canadian arena for their first games in each city.
     
     
  #968  
Old Posted May 21, 2011, 10:57 PM
roccerfeller's Avatar
roccerfeller roccerfeller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 2,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeDgE View Post
Is this for sure yet? If so congrats to Winnipeg! I can see the standing ovations at each Canadian arena for their first games in each city.
its done

just waiting on official announcement is all

stephen brunt is right
     
     
  #969  
Old Posted May 21, 2011, 11:52 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpikePhanta View Post
But I thought that Dominos will be the one supporting the new Winnipeg team
Is this a subtle pun about how Winnipeg is just the first domino to fall, and once that happens several more dominoes will fall (ie: more teams will be moving north)?
     
     
  #970  
Old Posted May 21, 2011, 11:53 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeDgE View Post
Is this for sure yet? If so congrats to Winnipeg! I can see the standing ovations at each Canadian arena for their first games in each city.
Absolutely. I'm a Flames STH (boo! hiss! I so can't wait to have more of the 'peggers in the NHL season threads here!) and I've already had 5 separate requests for tix for a "Jets" game since Thursday. People are excited about this across the entire country.

Edit: this was post 10,000 for me. Goddamnit, too much time here.
     
     
  #971  
Old Posted May 22, 2011, 12:01 AM
Only The Lonely..'s Avatar
Only The Lonely.. Only The Lonely.. is offline
Portage & Main 50 below
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoscStudent View Post
The Winnipeg Jets and the St. John's Jets.
Even better if the St. John's Jets become our farm team.

It would be nice to have an Atlantic Canada connection again like we had with the Moncton Hawks.
__________________
WINNIPEG: Home of Canada's first skyscraper!
     
     
  #972  
Old Posted May 22, 2011, 12:04 AM
Ayreonaut's Avatar
Ayreonaut Ayreonaut is offline
EVDS MPlan Grad
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 11,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Only The Lonely.. View Post
Even better if the St. John's Jets become our farm team.

It would be nice to have an Atlantic Canada connection again like we had with the Moncton Hawks.
That would be cool for me too. It would be tough to support a team with ties to the Canucks.
     
     
  #973  
Old Posted May 22, 2011, 12:05 AM
Only The Lonely..'s Avatar
Only The Lonely.. Only The Lonely.. is offline
Portage & Main 50 below
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
Absolutely. I'm a Flames STH (boo! hiss! I so can't wait to have more of the 'peggers in the NHL season threads here!) and I've already had 5 separate requests for tix for a "Jets" game since Thursday. People are excited about this across the entire country.

Edit: this was post 10,000 for me. Goddamnit, too much time here.
10,000 posts congratulations man! Based on your many hours on this forum, it looks like you took the oath of celibacy for skyscraperpage.com.
__________________
WINNIPEG: Home of Canada's first skyscraper!
     
     
  #974  
Old Posted May 22, 2011, 12:15 AM
Bassic Lab Bassic Lab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by roccerfeller View Post
re: financial discussion, yeah freeweed posted a nice comparison of how even at Moose AHL prices, they'd still be making more money (when looking solely at tickets)



People can mark this post, but in a year I think how much money Winnipeg's NHL team makes will surprise people.

Likely, it will be 4th in revenue out of the (soon to be) 7 Canadian teams, and not just for the first year (yes, ahead of Cal, Edm, Ott)

Why? because people are really looking way too much into attendance numbers.

Don't focus on the small picture.

This ownership group, TNSE, is key. Wouldn't be possible without them. They have a huge business plan.
That is really stretching it. TNSE's vaguely related developments might make their outfit more profitable but they cannot be considered team revenue. By that logic the Leafs' revenue is through the roof because of Cadillac Fairview's malls.

Winnipeg will likely not be able to raise as much revenue at the gate, through local television contracts, or via advertising as the other Canadian teams. That is pretty well all of the team revenue that is not centrally generated by the league and thus the same for every team. That said, those three numbers should still be quite a bit larger than the league average. I have little doubt that Winnipeg will prove to be a viable market, much more so than cities where hockey simply isn't popular, simply because it is in Canada but I doubt it will do better than larger cities with larger arenas and the same culturally attuned kind of fans.
     
     
  #975  
Old Posted May 22, 2011, 12:24 AM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassic Lab View Post
That is really stretching it. TNSE's vaguely related developments might make their outfit more profitable but they cannot be considered team revenue. By that logic the Leafs' revenue is through the roof because of Cadillac Fairview's malls.
Not really. The TNSE developments are contingent on having the Jets (or whatever they're to be called). So it might not make sense as an apples-to-apples comparison with other teams, but for TNSE, the question is how much can you make from the entire operation -- hotel, bars, arena, hockey club (the linchpin), office complex and parking. That's what they're looking at. It's synergies, to use the buzzword.
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
     
     
  #976  
Old Posted May 22, 2011, 12:39 AM
Bassic Lab Bassic Lab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy6 View Post
Not really. The TNSE developments are contingent on having the Jets (or whatever they're to be called). So it might not make sense as an apples-to-apples comparison with other teams, but for TNSE, the question is how much can you make from the entire operation -- hotel, bars, arena, hockey club (the linchpin), office complex and parking. That's what they're looking at. It's synergies, to use the buzzword.
Well a line must be drawn somewhere between the team and the other business interests of the various owners. There will undoubtedly be some kind of connections between those ventures, whether it be MLSE's condo developments near the ACC or the Molson's strange mix of beer, hockey, and nationalism, but I tend to think that the team is the team and only its revenue counts. The confabulation of the different ventures can lead to Phoenix type situations where creating a mall/downtown on the edge of a metro is seen as a hockey team's raison d'être.
     
     
  #977  
Old Posted May 22, 2011, 1:40 AM
roccerfeller's Avatar
roccerfeller roccerfeller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 2,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassic Lab View Post
That is really stretching it. TNSE's vaguely related developments might make their outfit more profitable but they cannot be considered team revenue. By that logic the Leafs' revenue is through the roof because of Cadillac Fairview's malls.

Winnipeg will likely not be able to raise as much revenue at the gate, through local television contracts, or via advertising as the other Canadian teams. That is pretty well all of the team revenue that is not centrally generated by the league and thus the same for every team. That said, those three numbers should still be quite a bit larger than the league average. I have little doubt that Winnipeg will prove to be a viable market, much more so than cities where hockey simply isn't popular, simply because it is in Canada but I doubt it will do better than larger cities with larger arenas and the same culturally attuned kind of fans.

Get back at me in 5 yrs

all im gonna say on this point. its all speculation on either side, but informed speculation on mine.

trust me, if other NHL cities have the type of system TNSE will have, they will be making amounts of money that people can't believe...Calgary could be a top 5 revenue team easily with a similar set up for the city.

you have permission to rub it in my face 5 yrs from now if my claims are proven unsubstantiated
     
     
  #978  
Old Posted May 22, 2011, 1:45 AM
PoscStudent's Avatar
PoscStudent PoscStudent is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: St. John's
Posts: 3,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by Only The Lonely.. View Post
Even better if the St. John's Jets become our farm team.

It would be nice to have an Atlantic Canada connection again like we had with the Moncton Hawks.
St. John's is going to be Winnipeg's farm team. Here's more information.
http://www.thetelegram.com/News/Loca...%26rsquo%3Bs/1
     
     
  #979  
Old Posted May 22, 2011, 3:18 AM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Only The Lonely.. View Post
10,000 posts congratulations man! Based on your many hours on this forum, it looks like you took the oath of celibacy for skyscraperpage.com.
Sadly no, it's just an indication of how quickly I type. Plus I have a lenient at-work Internet policy.
     
     
  #980  
Old Posted May 22, 2011, 3:20 AM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by roccerfeller View Post
trust me, if other NHL cities have the type of system TNSE will have, they will be making amounts of money that people can't believe...Calgary could be a top 5 revenue team easily with a similar set up for the city.
Yeah, Calgary is a good comparison. I'm not privy to exactly how the money flows, but the Saddledome is not owned by the Flames. They do not have access to all sorts of revenue streams, yet they manage to turn a profit most years.

Granted, Calgary and Winnipeg are polar opposites economically, but TNSE has their shit together. And if not, let them lose money. I don't see why people are so down on the whole thing. For fuck's sake, hundreds of people closed the city's busiest intersection ON A RUMOUR. If that doesn't show insane passion for the game, nothing does.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:49 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.