HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9741  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2015, 5:31 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 25,930
I parked at 39th ave station yesterday to take the train to the Stampede. Looks like they finally have the platform extension done. Wasn't that the last one they needed on the Somerset / Tuscany line before implementing 4 car trains? When are they supposed to start?
     
     
  #9742  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2015, 5:54 PM
andasen andasen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 227
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular View Post
I parked at 39th ave station yesterday to take the train to the Stampede. Looks like they finally have the platform extension done. Wasn't that the last one they needed on the Somerset / Tuscany line before implementing 4 car trains? When are they supposed to start?
I believe they are still not finished the traction power upgrades.
     
     
  #9743  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2015, 6:12 PM
ByeByeBaby's Avatar
ByeByeBaby ByeByeBaby is offline
Crunchin' the numbers.
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: T2R, YYC, 403, CA-AB.
Posts: 791
And of course the rolling stock isn't here yet. When the order was made, the first train was due to arrive this August; I'm not sure if there has been any slippage in the schedule. Supposed to start 4-car at the end of this year, IIRC.
     
     
  #9744  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2015, 10:06 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 25,930
Thanks for the answers guys.
     
     
  #9745  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2015, 2:34 PM
Socguy Socguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 494
When the new cars start arriving, are they going to immediately start some 4 car trains or just replace some of the old and busted 3 car trains?
     
     
  #9746  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2015, 5:29 PM
CalgaryAlex's Avatar
CalgaryAlex CalgaryAlex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 617
Quote:
Originally Posted by Socguy View Post
When the new cars start arriving, are they going to immediately start some 4 car trains or just replace some of the old and busted 3 car trains?
They are supposed to arrive from August to December. Since Calgary Transit has stated that 4-car service will start in December, I assume most of the early deliveries will replace the more costly U2 cars.

In total, I believe 80 U2 cars are still running and we've only ordered 60 S200 cars, so we'll still have some classic rolling stock. I like that.
     
     
  #9747  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2015, 8:39 PM
Socguy Socguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 494
Hmm, that's what I was afraid of.

Instead of simply replacing and parking the old trains as the new ones arrive, I'd like to see those replaced train sets broken up and one car then added to 3 other old trains so that we'd start seeing 4 car trains ASAP. Even if they just used those during rush hours and parked them for the rest of the day. This system is straining and we need that capacity badly.
     
     
  #9748  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2015, 9:41 PM
CTrainDude CTrainDude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 517
Quote:
Originally Posted by Socguy View Post
Hmm, that's what I was afraid of.

Instead of simply replacing and parking the old trains as the new ones arrive, I'd like to see those replaced train sets broken up and one car then added to 3 other old trains so that we'd start seeing 4 car trains ASAP. Even if they just used those during rush hours and parked them for the rest of the day. This system is straining and we need that capacity badly.
The new cars that are being delivered probably won't be coming until November. 4-car service will begin in December, gradually, using existing rolling stock. For every three S200s that enter service, the three cars they're replacing on one train can be spread to add a fourth car to three other trains.
Only 20 of the order of 60 are for U2 replacement.
     
     
  #9749  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2015, 9:43 PM
CalgaryAlex's Avatar
CalgaryAlex CalgaryAlex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 617
Quote:
Originally Posted by Socguy View Post
Hmm, that's what I was afraid of.

Instead of simply replacing and parking the old trains as the new ones arrive, I'd like to see those replaced train sets broken up and one car then added to 3 other old trains so that we'd start seeing 4 car trains ASAP. Even if they just used those during rush hours and parked them for the rest of the day. This system is straining and we need that capacity badly.
Yeah, I feel the same way. Judging from how other systems throughout the world treat their rolling stock, I would figure the U2s have another 5-10 years left in them. London is still using some stock from the 70s and New York is using stock from the 60s through to 80s as well.

I haven't seen numbers on how much the U2s are costing vs. the value they contribute to train frequency though, so I don't know if my above assumptions are correct. I'd like to see the analysis CT has done to determine the end of the lifecycle of older units. I'm hoping it isn't some dolt at CT simply saying "newer is better".

In my experience, the newer stock encounters just as many problems as U2s.
     
     
  #9750  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2015, 10:53 PM
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz Fuzz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,421
There is a report somewhere that had the numbers for how often the various versions of cars break down. From what I remember, the U2's experienced significantly more issues, causing CT to decide they are better to remove them completely than deal with breakage issues.

I'd suspect our winters may be a bit harder on the trains as well.
     
     
  #9751  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 2:22 AM
Socguy Socguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 494
I get the desire to escape from breakdowns, but I think the way you get around them is to only run 'old' 4 car trains during peak hours then let them sit for the rest of the day. You minimize the time they run, you minimize potential problems. This would be a temporary thing anyway as after all the new cars arrive and are in service, there will not be a need for the older models. They can then be stored/sold/scrapped or whatever CT is planning.

At least this way the capacity issues can start to be addressed as soon as the new cars arrive instead of waiting months.
     
     
  #9752  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 3:00 AM
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz Fuzz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,421
Yes, but by running a 4 car train you then have 4 old cars that can suffer a breakage. One train goes in rush hour down and the system is chaos. I'm sure they looked into it and have made the right decision. They have very detailed numbers on how many hours each car goes between breakdowns. A few more months isn't going to make much difference.
     
     
  #9753  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 1:04 PM
VIce VIce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by Socguy View Post
When the new cars start arriving, are they going to immediately start some 4 car trains or just replace some of the old and busted 3 car trains?
Neither. The new EMUs cannot couple with the old ones, so a minimum of three deliveries have to occur before they can start running any new trains. When they do so (at the end of the year), then they will start 4-car operation.
     
     
  #9754  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 1:06 PM
VIce VIce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryAlex View Post
Yeah, I feel the same way. Judging from how other systems throughout the world treat their rolling stock, I would figure the U2s have another 5-10 years left in them. London is still using some stock from the 70s and New York is using stock from the 60s through to 80s as well.

I haven't seen numbers on how much the U2s are costing vs. the value they contribute to train frequency though, so I don't know if my above assumptions are correct. I'd like to see the analysis CT has done to determine the end of the lifecycle of older units. I'm hoping it isn't some dolt at CT simply saying "newer is better".

In my experience, the newer stock encounters just as many problems as U2s.
Remember, rolling stock in New York and London have much less wear from environmental factors than in Calgary, being mostly underground.
     
     
  #9755  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 2:55 PM
lineman's Avatar
lineman lineman is offline
power to the people!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Crescent Heights, Calgary
Posts: 864
From my experience, for some reason most OCS tear downs are caused by U2s pantographs.
     
     
  #9756  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 3:03 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Yes, but by running a 4 car train you then have 4 old cars that can suffer a breakage. One train goes in rush hour down and the system is chaos. I'm sure they looked into it and have made the right decision. They have very detailed numbers on how many hours each car goes between breakdowns. A few more months isn't going to make much difference.
Yeah. Also that refurbishing only buys you so many years for the cost. By thinking about purchasing 'car availability years' instead of purchasing vs refurbishing, the optimal solution becomes easier.

Quote:
Slower transit system tied to aging LRT cars; Replacement urged by 2020, at cost of $312M
Markusoff, Jason. Calgary Herald [Calgary, Alta] 04 Sep 2013: A.3.

The worsening breakdown rate of Calgary's three-decade-old LRT cars is not only adding to transit riders' routine agony, but it could also take a big bite out of Calgarians' ambitions to expand the CTrain system further.

Transportation general manager Mac Logan told a council committee Tuesday that all of the 78 remaining Siemens U2 cars - which have been running since the CTrain system launched in 1981 - should be retired by the end of the decade.

That's at about $4 million a car, or $312 million, total in replacement costs. With money only committed to retiring 20 of those early-1980s clunkers, the city's attempt to replace the rest of the old Siemens U2 cars will have to compete with bids to spend dollars on new or extended transit lines.

Calgary Transit had expected about 12 to 15 LRT car mechanical failures to running trains every month, fleet manager Russell Davies said Tuesday in an interview. Instead, it's getting 20 to 22, he said.

In the first half of the year, train delays greater than three minutes long were 38 per cent more common than they were in 2012. These statistics are coming despite Calgary Transit's renewed efforts in the last couple years to improve performance of the system's oldest vehicles.

There's no common or chronic problem that mechanics can pinpoint and repair, Davies said. The aging, heavily used trains are showing wear and tear at every joint. And the diversity of problems makes the fixes even tougher.

"It's a 50-year-old design on a 30-year-old train. It's getting tough to find parts," he said.

As soon as this week, the city will announce the manufacturer of the next batch of 50 new-generation trains. But only 20 of those will go toward replacing the oldest of the U2 cars, and the rest will be used to expand the fleet for four-car train service beginning in 2015.

That means halfway through this decade, 58 of the oldest cars will remain in service, normally all at once during the morning and afternoon rush periods. The U2s are 2 1/2times more likely to break down than the newer Siemens SD trains, which constitute a majority of the fleet.

It means some costly decisions will hang over future councils. Mayor Naheed Nenshi had pushed Calgary Transit to squeeze more life out of the old ones, but he'll ease up on that push after seeing new numbers in a committee report.

"I've always thought with a little baling wire and duct tape, we should be able to keep them going at a significantly lower cost than buying new cars," Nenshi said. "What we're really seeing right now is that they're starting to reach the end of the life cycle."

He said that while the increasing failure of Calgary's CTrain vehicles poses a budget problem, it's a nastier issue for commuters. "If they can't rely on the train getting them there because it's going to break down, that's a big issue and we're going to have to address that," the mayor said.

Other bidders beside Siemens are vying for the city's new 50-car LRT contract, which includes an option for council to purchase more. While the other bidders are a city secret for now, several other manufacturers - including Canada's Bombardier - are capable of tailoring an LRT car to Calgary's system.

The city's contract will also task the manufacturer to find a use for the retiring U2 cars, Davies said.

While some will be scrapped for parts for Calgary's remaining old vehicles, others may find new homes - "some Third World countries that have been trying to start offwith low-cost, startup systems," Davies said.
     
     
  #9757  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 3:34 PM
para transit fellow para transit fellow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 238
Montreal's OPUS transit pass system final gets the ability to reload from home... if you buy a $17 gadget to re-load the pass..

http://montrealgazette.com/news/loca...s-for-the-home
     
     
  #9758  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 8:18 PM
Socguy Socguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 494
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Yes, but by running a 4 car train you then have 4 old cars that can suffer a breakage. One train goes in rush hour down and the system is chaos. I'm sure they looked into it and have made the right decision. They have very detailed numbers on how many hours each car goes between breakdowns. A few more months isn't going to make much difference.
There is going to be 3 old cars running anyway. How much worse can adding an extra car make the reliability, especially if it's just for a few months and only used during peak hours?

I think the reliability argument is really a poor one. Instead I think that CT just doesn't want the hassle when they can just pretend this option doesn't exist.
     
     
  #9759  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 8:24 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Socguy View Post
There is going to be 3 old cars running anyway. How much worse can adding an extra car make the reliability, especially if it's just for a few months and only used during peak hours?

I think the reliability argument is really a poor one. Instead I think that CT just doesn't want the hassle when they can just pretend this option doesn't exist.
Agree with socguy. Incremental maintenance and upkeep costs over a controlled period would pale in comparison to the cash flow implications of moving to all brand new units. What do these suckers cost each again?
     
     
  #9760  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 10:07 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by Socguy View Post
There is going to be 3 old cars running anyway. How much worse can adding an extra car make the reliability, especially if it's just for a few months and only used during peak hours?

I think the reliability argument is really a poor one. Instead I think that CT just doesn't want the hassle when they can just pretend this option doesn't exist.
I think you're making an issue where there isn't one. Having the oldest, least reliable units off the system is obviously preferable to having a fraction of the trains in service at one point being four car. We've had 3 cars for the life of the system, you really think it's a big deal that you are going to have to wait a few months to have the chance to be on a 4 car train?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:16 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.