Quote:
Originally Posted by scania
I'm not sure the relevancy of stating you grew up in England. England is an entire Country with different looks, from urban to the country side. IMO, it isn't fair to compare Warner Robins to any urban city. The entire country isn't meant to have a Manhattan feel throughout every part of the state.
Now it is essential for the government to have a say. This should keep things in order. If it was all up to the people, that would easily lead to forms of discrimination. And there are many types of discrimination. With that being said, there are a lot of people who could careless about having street level retail on every corner, just as it is important to some……
…..On another topic, some people feel that my statements can be harsh/insulting. Even though most of the time it is in response to someone throwing the egg first. Hopefully, we can all move on and I will do my best to express my thoughts without being rude or insulting.
|
I say i grew up in England because, prior to coming to America, i had never seen a city centered around strip malls. Because of the historical nature of the buildings in the UK, we have very strict guidelines to guide a few things, mainly 1) making sure that buildings fit in aesthetically with their surroundings and don't take away from the area, and 2) making sure that land is reused, because although it would be cheaper to just buy land elsewhere and build new shops, it ends up creating dead zones in the centre of cities.
Now, regarding the second part of your statement, i agree, it wouldn't be fair to compare Warner Robins to Atlanta or any other big city, which is why i wasn't. I was making the point that when a government (any government) decides that they will not make any zoning regulations, private businesses will do nothing but things that turn a profit. In Warner Robins that manifests as big box retailers with massive seas of parking lots, along with dead zones throughout the city where retailers abandoned their old buildings to make new ones in the newer parts of the city. In Atlanta, that would manifest as what we're arguing about; developers who couldn't care less what the outside of the building looks like with regards to the surrounding neighborhood and will fight to keep themselves from having to spend a penny to conform to those standards.
All in all, i understand the entire country isn't supposed to have a Manhattan feel to it, but you're presenting a false dichotomy, it doesn't have to be either strip malls or skyscrapers. You can still have parks in the suburbs and in the country. You can still have pretty streets and walkable areas.