HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2017, 2:26 AM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by elly63 View Post
Hmm! What happened to the roof?



Artist Rendering of McMahon Stadium for Opening Ceremonies, Calgary, Alberta
Date of creation 1986-87

It was left on the design room floor. Your actual photo is what was done (plus some temp stands).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2017, 3:15 AM
Hackslack Hackslack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,807
I agree. But to be clear, I am in no way defending Murray and the Flames to get a publicly funded gift of an arena. That should not, will not, happen. There are certainly benefits to both sides, with both private and public funding, under the right circumstances. I was simply defending Edwards from being called an "awful" person.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2017, 3:42 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
I don't know if Murray Edwards is an awful person or not. Just because he "donates" millions doesn't preclude him from being an awful person.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2017, 6:41 AM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
They don't need to sell property or other assets they don't live in or use if they surprisingly don't have tens of millions in cash on hand. They just sell a few shares. It's more wealth than can be reasonable spent in a lifetime. There's no comparison. It's foolish to even try.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2017, 3:11 AM
elly63 elly63 is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Stadium talk dominates CFL expansion discussion
FRANCIS CAMPBELL The Chronicle Herald December 28, 2017
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2017, 2:36 PM
Rollerstud98 Rollerstud98 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,820
Yeah everything seems to work including all the port-a-potty’s. Lol.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2017, 3:34 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Can't help but notice that a lot of the posters with Calgary in their avatars have a decidedly negative bent. What happened to that can-do attitude that the west was so well known for?

One thing I would be vocal about was if the city was to go it alone on a new field house costing over 200 million, I'd be pushing for why a deal with the Stamps can't be negotiated when the original idea was a combo field house stadium.

It's easy to have a hate on for the millionaire/billionaires but looking at how Halifax is handling the stadium discussions vs the city of Calgary, I'd say the city of Calgary ain't lookin' too good in this discussion either.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2017, 4:12 PM
GernB GernB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lethbridge AB
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by elly63 View Post
Can't help but notice that a lot of the posters with Calgary in their avatars have a decidedly negative bent. What happened to that can-do attitude that the west was so well known for?

One thing I would be vocal about was if the city was to go it alone on a new field house costing over 200 million, I'd be pushing for why a deal with the Stamps can't be negotiated when the original idea was a combo field house stadium.

It's easy to have a hate on for the millionaire/billionaires but looking at how Halifax is handling the stadium discussions vs the city of Calgary, I'd say the city of Calgary ain't lookin' too good in this discussion either.
The original idea wasn't for a combo stadium/fieldhouse, that was the Flames/Stamps ownership trying to piggyback on the original idea of a stand alone fieldhouse, as well as wanting to move it from the originally proposed location in Foothills Athletic Park to just west of downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2017, 8:05 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by GernB View Post
The original idea wasn't for a combo stadium/fieldhouse, that was the Flames/Stamps ownership trying to piggyback on the original idea of a stand alone fieldhouse, as well as wanting to move it from the originally proposed location in Foothills Athletic Park to just west of downtown.
True, but that field house has apparently been one of the top infrastructure needs for quite a long time and the city seemed to be in no hurry to build it. I didn't see anything wrong with the Stamps trying to piggyback on the idea. The only issue was who would pay for what and where, not so much that the idea was bad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2017, 4:42 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by elly63 View Post
Can't help but notice that a lot of the posters with Calgary in their avatars have a decidedly negative bent. What happened to that can-do attitude that the west was so well known for?

One thing I would be vocal about was if the city was to go it alone on a new field house costing over 200 million, I'd be pushing for why a deal with the Stamps can't be negotiated when the original idea was a combo field house stadium.

It's easy to have a hate on for the millionaire/billionaires but looking at how Halifax is handling the stadium discussions vs the city of Calgary, I'd say the city of Calgary ain't lookin' too good in this discussion either.
Interesting perspective to say the least. I find Calgary posters as optimistic as every despite a core industry falling on hard times. Their unwillingness to shell out for a stadium for a multi-million dollar corporation actually supports their optimism and can do attitude. They're very confident in their position as a strong NHL market that either the Flames or someone else will reach an agreement with the city on an appropriate cost structure.

There's nothing new happening in Halifax either. It's just another group looking towards the city and province to speculate on financing a CFL a stadium with a cheap rendering and some market analysis.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2017, 5:06 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 40,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
There's nothing new happening in Halifax either. It's just another group looking towards the city and province to speculate on financing a CFL a stadium with a cheap rendering and some market analysis.
I would agree with that. The proposed ownership group has sports management experience but I doubt their pockets are very deep. I don't think this project will get very far unless the government kicks in significant financial support for the construction of a stadium (at least half).

Will the government do this? I'm not sure. At least NS is currently running a balanced budget, so judicious borrowing to help fund construction wouldn't break the bank (so to speak). How will this play with the taxpayer? If properly marketed as Halifax being on the cusp of being a "big league city", this could play well in HRM. There may be a lot of antipathy in the rest of the province however since Halifax always seems to get everything anyway (at least as far as the rural folk are concerned)..........
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2017, 9:32 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
The proposed ownership group has sports management experience but I doubt their pockets are very deep. I don't think this project will get very far unless the government kicks in significant financial support for the construction of a stadium (at least half).
I don't know if that is a fair statement to make. My original thought was they were something like the Brad Waters group but since then we know they've been vetted by Ambrosie (a well versed financial guy). Also they somehow managed a 50 million dollar payroll at Phoenix instead of a 5 million dollar CFL payroll. Not sure what they got in the Coyote sale perhaps near 150 million for their remaining 46 percent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jan 1, 2018, 4:45 AM
FutureSmith's Avatar
FutureSmith FutureSmith is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 98
McMahon Concourse

Was someone in here looking for a shot of the concourse in McMahon stadium? I was looking around and managed to find this:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2017, 5:40 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is online now
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
There's nothing new happening in Halifax either. It's just another group looking towards the city and province to speculate on financing a CFL a stadium with a cheap rendering and some market analysis.
Was there a rendering of a proposed Halifax stadium for this current CFL bid ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2017, 5:46 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 40,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
Was there a rendering of a proposed Halifax stadium for this current CFL bid ?
Not as far as I know.

They also have not settled on a site for the stadium.
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2017, 7:05 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
They also have not settled on a site for the stadium.
There were three or four sites that the potential ownership group were looking at for a stadium which they shared with the City and presumably also the Province. No renders or any other information were made available.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2017, 7:52 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
Was there a rendering of a proposed Halifax stadium for this current CFL bid ?
'Defining moment': CFL commissioner sparks expansion hope in Halifax
Randy Ambrosie says it’s the unfilled part of national dream
Devin Heroux, CBC Sports Nov 25, 2017

LeBlanc said he's hired an architect in Los Angeles to produce a stadium rendering that was presented to Halifax council.

"They went to the Atlantic Schooners wikipedia page and saw the old colour scheme and took it and made this rendering look like it. The councilors just loved it," he said.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2017, 8:11 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
There's nothing new happening in Halifax either. It's just another group looking towards the city and province to speculate on financing a CFL a stadium with a cheap rendering and some market analysis.
Proof?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2018, 4:10 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by elly63 View Post
Proof?
We've been through this before. It's all over the article you posted. If you don't see it that doesn't mean it isn't there. The obvious choices are they produced a rendering, name and, "real money on economic an impact study " and presented those to council. First, all of those are nominal expenses compared to the cost of a stadium. "Real" is overkill. Second, the only purpose to present concept renderings, team names and an impact study to council is to swoon them over. You only need planning approvals if you're self financing. You don't need to do a whole stick about the investment paying for itself.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jan 1, 2018, 4:13 PM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
Hah, that picture of McMahon does not convey the real experience. It is way less spacious than that Ivor Wynne shot and McMahon, it's just been all bandaids over the years. I guess the one good thing about McMahon is that the washrooms provide a warm respite on cold days as the concourse certainly does not unless you're volunteering/working in a concession and even in the concessions it's often cold enough to require coats or more.

Now I realize that comfort in a concession stand is most likely not a priority when it comes to building a stadium but the fans should deserve a bit more than they're currently getting at McMahon.
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:36 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.