HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    432 Park Avenue in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #921  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2012, 1:28 AM
SD_Phil's Avatar
SD_Phil SD_Phil is offline
Heavy User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 2,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
Personally, I believe foundation work will begin by the end of the year. Everything so far seems to suggest it, but we'll see.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...415136636.html
Thanks!
     
     
  #922  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2012, 3:09 AM
reencharles's Avatar
reencharles reencharles is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 274
MY GOD, 432 meters?!
The height is even better than I imagined ... It is amazing to think that Midtown will finally have a building with more than 400 meters.

Anyway, it seems that the reign of the World Trade Center as the tallest building in the city (roof height) will not last long. And this is very good for the city, shows that the city continues to grow.
     
     
  #923  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2012, 5:28 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,326
I really hope that 432 meter figure is correct, 1WTC shouldn't be the highest roof in NYC. I'm looking foward to seeing the final design though, some nice glass could really make this look good.

128 apartments? Is it a mixed use tower?
     
     
  #924  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2012, 6:00 AM
gramsjdg's Avatar
gramsjdg gramsjdg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 757
Man, I hope 432.8 meters ends up being final! That would rock! The best part would be that it might get others to build roof heights in NYC taller than 1400 ft as well.
     
     
  #925  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2012, 6:56 AM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
+
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,415
I can't see this building being built, not if it stays true to the current renderings that we've been provided. Either the height will be decreased or if it remains the same, the design will be radically altered.
     
     
  #926  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2012, 10:49 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,326
^What on earth are you basing that on? It's approved and they have 1420 feet of air rights.
     
     
  #927  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2012, 4:32 PM
2-TOWERS's Avatar
2-TOWERS 2-TOWERS is offline
Twin Towers Guy / NYC
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Palm Desert , Ca
Posts: 637
hope to see this building rise to this height
     
     
  #928  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2012, 5:06 PM
babybackribs2314 babybackribs2314 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UWS, Manhattan
Posts: 1,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapatan View Post
^what on earth are you basing that on? It's approved and they have 1420 feet of air rights.
How many times does it need to be repeated: air rights are for the amount of space that is allowed to be developed, NOT HEIGHT!!!
     
     
  #929  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2012, 5:09 PM
hunser's Avatar
hunser hunser is offline
don't *meddle*...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City / Wien
Posts: 4,016
As I said, this is not official. CTBUH got the information from the WSJ. That's why they don't have the floor count.
     
     
  #930  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2012, 5:14 PM
Don098 Don098 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rosslyn, VA
Posts: 1,179
I said this a long time ago and I'll say it again. I'm reserving judgement until I see OFFICIAL RENDERS from the source with REAL height numbers, etc. etc. Why hasn't the official render been released? Have they not completed the design?
     
     
  #931  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2012, 9:11 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is online now
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 52,984
^ Probably wasn't finial at the time. It likely won't look much different from the rendering we've seen, we'll just have a better detailed look. We don't have an exact height yet. Plans for the complete building haven't been filed with the City. It's only a matter of time though.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian. View Post
Looks like pouring those walls to shore up the foundations of the adjacent buildings was to go deeper.
That's what I'm thinking.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #932  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2012, 9:19 PM
hunser's Avatar
hunser hunser is offline
don't *meddle*...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City / Wien
Posts: 4,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
^ Probably wasn't finial at the time. It likely won't look much different from the rendering we've seen, we'll just have a better detailed look. We don't have an exact height yet. Plans for the complete building haven't been filed with the City. It's only a matter of time though.
You mean DOB filing? I'll do a quick search, maybe something pops up.

EDIT: Nope, nothing. Just some demolition permits...
     
     
  #933  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2012, 9:55 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is online now
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 52,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by hunser View Post
You mean DOB filing? I'll do a quick search, maybe something pops up.

EDIT: Nope, nothing. Just some demolition permits...
A permit was filed for the foundation and I believe the first 6 or so levels.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...rk_real_estate

Quote:
Work Set to Begin at Drake Hotel Site

The owner of the former Drake Hotel site on Park Avenue, one of the premier Manhattan development sites, is taking its first major step toward building on the property, according to a recent application with the Department of Buildings. The owner, Los Angeles-based CIM Group, hasn't said what it's planning to build. The application calls for a five-story office building, but that's not a reliable indication of what's to come. The subterranean work for a five-story building or 50-story building is considered quite similar. Under current zoning, a much bigger tower could be built. The application allows the developers to begin initial work without tipping their hand.


http://www.observer.com/2011/real-es...velopment-site

Quote:
Stirrings at North America’s Most Valuable Development Site

By Laura Kusisto 4/15/11

Developers are moving forward with super-secretive plans to begin construction on the most valuable development site in North America.

A team led by the California-based CIM Group has filed an application with the Department of Buildings to begin construction on the site, at Park Avenue and 57th Street where the Drake Hotel once was, according to public records.
This particular filing was disapproved on the 9th, but that's pretty standard...
http://a810-bisweb.nyc.gov/bisweb/Jo...ssdocnumber=02

Quote:
Work on Floor(s): SC2,SC1,CEL,0RF 001 thru 006
MECHANICAL WORK ASSOCIATED WITH NEW BUILDING AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS FILED HEREWITH.

Partial approval on the 9th...
http://a810-bisweb.nyc.gov/bisweb/Jo...ssdocnumber=01

Quote:
ERECT NEW BUILDING AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS FILED HEREWITH.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.

Last edited by NYguy; Jan 14, 2012 at 10:11 PM.
     
     
  #934  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2012, 10:00 PM
2-TOWERS's Avatar
2-TOWERS 2-TOWERS is offline
Twin Towers Guy / NYC
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Palm Desert , Ca
Posts: 637
what will the dimensions be for this building it seem like it will be thin
     
     
  #935  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2012, 12:04 AM
THE BIG APPLE's Avatar
THE BIG APPLE THE BIG APPLE is offline
Khurram Parvaz
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2-TOWERS View Post
what will the dimensions be for this building it seem like it will be thin
I don't know how accurate the SSP diagrams are, but the new 1WTC is 200x200 ft and the old Twins were each 208x208 feet. JUDGING by the DIAGRAMS it is much skinner. So I would say appox. 140x140 or 150x150 ft. Not exact because I'm not sure, but just judging by the diagram on SSP.
__________________
One man with courage is a majority - Thomas Jefferson
     
     
  #936  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2012, 12:22 AM
RobertWalpole RobertWalpole is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,911
Acording to the architect, the height to width ratio is 19:1.
     
     
  #937  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2012, 2:06 AM
THE BIG APPLE's Avatar
THE BIG APPLE THE BIG APPLE is offline
Khurram Parvaz
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,424
I just did the calculations (based on 1,350 feet). So is it really going to be 71x71 feet.
__________________
One man with courage is a majority - Thomas Jefferson
     
     
  #938  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2012, 5:18 PM
Eidolon's Avatar
Eidolon Eidolon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 697
This building has gradually become one of my favourite projects in NYC even though I started out hating it, and if this really does end up being 432 meters tall I will be most pleased.
     
     
  #939  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2012, 5:59 PM
88madri 88madri is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3
I have one question. All the building will be in the area they are working now?? Or they have to demolish some of the building close to it?? I mean the ones we can see in the webcam

Thanks
     
     
  #940  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2012, 6:16 PM
RobertWalpole RobertWalpole is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,911
I suspect that it's called 432 Park because it's 432m tall. Recall that The Drake's site, on which this tower will sit, had an address of 440 Park.

Last edited by RobertWalpole; Jan 15, 2012 at 7:34 PM.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:12 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.