Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire
^ That threat is completely empty. You couldn't convince me that at least one owner wouldn't leave their market for Calgary in a heartbeat if the Saddledome became vacant. Calgary is one of the richest hockey markets on earth in terms of the number of dollars that fans are prepared to spend on hockey.
Imagine if the Leafs threatened to leave Toronto... there would be half a dozen owners fighting to move in once the Leafs left. Calgary's situation is not as extreme, but it's not that far off. The current situation is a far cry from the 90s when owners could effectively play that card in Canadian markets.
|
Even then, it's a tactic that doesn't play well here. Canada isn't some sunshine state that will pay top dollar to subsidize a team at the drop of an empty threat (here's looking at you, Miami!).
Winnipeg and Quebec City let their NHL teams go when their cities couldn't support them. Montreal let the Expos go too, as did Vancouver with the Grizzlies.
The trick to getting a subsidized arena here is to get a grassroots fan base supporting a new venue. See: the Skydome or Rogers Place in Edmonton. Or do it under the guise of improving a downtown area, like in Winnipeg.