Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531
This is for construction and urban development. This isn't simply for skyscrapers. I'm all for skyscrapers, but you can't expect 1k footers to just magically appear every few years unless you're NYC and have the economy and investors to do it.
You can have all the skyscrapers in the downtown area in the world, but if you have no urban walkable vibrant neighborhoods around this downtown, then who cares? That's something many of the sunbelt cities struggles with, though it's changing for some. I go to cities to experience life on the streets, not what's at thousand feet. 
|
you described houston in a nutshell, haha.
the only thing that puts me off are these stick-built projects that aren't made to last more than a few years. as long as what's going up is A, solid concrete or steel construction, and B, has active street-level use, i couldn't be happier.
the only exception i can think to this is the emory proton therapy clinic. i think it's really an awful waste of space and should've been located out around emory or at least have been the first story in a multiple-level project.
i'll be honest, proton therapy seems to be not much better than other radiation therapy, and costs much much more. it is probably just another way to take advantage of desperate people. the way that we treat cancer now is medieval. when someone finally gets the cure for cancer out there the 'proton therapy clinic' is going to sound like the 'leech and electroshock therapy sanitarium' does to us.